Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 DG Hisham: KKM MAY start using Ivermectin

views
     
diffyhelman2
post Jul 11 2021, 07:42 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
863 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(ieatchickens @ Jul 11 2021, 01:32 AM)
Thanks DG, and may god bless.
Now, to make sure no dumbass nurse triples the 3mg into horse dosage territory, where all of the reported side-effects/dangers comes from.
sigh, on hindsight most woulda kept quiet too.
*
The recommended dosage is 12-16mg daily depending on your body weight but this is the standard for most normal weight adults. 200ug/kg bw/day.
diffyhelman2
post Jul 11 2021, 08:17 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
863 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(Heroicage @ Jul 11 2021, 07:39 AM)
this drug does NOT guarantee or replaces vaccination....

it reduces your chances to ICU.

aside that prep for real side effects like liver, pancreas, kidney impact/risk....

note, it would be good if they did studies together with other drugs that offer better boosted safety to reduce ICU.
*
When they used Ivermectin together with other drugs (epidemiological studies, cohort studies etc), these were slammed by critics as confounding factors. Hence to them the only evidence acceptable is dbRCT using Ivermectin as the sole source of intervention vs placebo (not standard of care as this is another source of confounding).

This post has been edited by diffyhelman2: Jul 11 2021, 08:18 AM
diffyhelman2
post Jul 11 2021, 09:46 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
863 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(lowya @ Jul 11 2021, 09:33 AM)
PRE-COVID and pre-MRNA time, flu shots in US has already been proven futile. Given mRNA technology is very unstable, would it be wise for a doctor to prescribe it to his "patients" who are not even sick?

getting positive in covid test means yr body has recognized the virus, it doesn't mean you are sick. But if u want to change the definition of sickness to pursue your agenda, obviously media will hey why not that's another profit for us when we got your attention, and the vicious cycle of fear churning more fearful decision goes on and on endlessly until the system wears off and soon u realized it one that this is all how virus works in our immune system in the evolution cycle, those control freaks are the real source of your Misérables.
*
I was in US for ten years. Every winter the mass media and radio will mass advertise for “people to get their flu shots”. Mostly targeting the elderly. I never once took it. Every year only 50-60% take the flu shot. And US is one of the highest usage of flu vaccination shots in the world.

Here in Malaysia i dont think even 10% of the population ever take flu shot. Now suddenly govt is normalizing the idea of everyone must vaccinate or we can’t open up.

user posted image
user posted image
diffyhelman2
post Jul 12 2021, 12:06 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
863 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(aspartame @ Jul 11 2021, 10:55 AM)
If AZ ARR is just 1.3%... how do you explain drastic drop in number of deaths in UK despite surging cases? The only explanation is that the vaccine AZ works...right?
*
I think you are not getting the idea of ARR. ARR is dependent on the background risk of catching covid in the first place. For the lancet article, they had low ARR because during the time they were doing the trials the prevalence of Covid was not as high as during the second wave. you mention 5mil/60 mil population in the UK already infected with Sars2-covid. that is for the entire period since pandemic started in Mar 2020. ARR is always calculated base on a defined period (for eg the vaccine trial period).

If you can imagine that over a period of X years, you will have 100% chance of catching covid, then the vaccine ARR = RRR.

This is also why using ARR is problematic during an ongoing infectious pandemic cycle. ARR would be more appropriate if used during a steady state endemic level situation where the background risk is stable and constant. However during a pandemic, the force of the infection is dynamic, if its not well controlled by vaccines, SOP etc, the background risk would increase exponentially. The ironic thing is, the higher the background risk, the higher the ARR figures would be.

This post has been edited by diffyhelman2: Jul 12 2021, 12:08 AM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0192sec    0.35    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 27th November 2025 - 01:48 PM