Many studies included were not peer reviewed and a wide range of doses were evaluated.

Lol

Lulz you are talking about the dumb lawsuit india start at india kangaroo Court to charge WHO officer right? It is funny that the person they charged is also indian abit female. Look like that country has issue when being told off by women

Maybe consider to allow = allow

BTW Robert malone is not inventor of mRNA vaccine

All vaccine has done clinical trial prior

And ivermectin has none, period

even one thousand name on it, it is still not peer reviewed

do you even science bro?

who says?

many scalpers now lurking around trying to sell ivermectin at 100x inflated price

big business here

that is why so many ivermectin tered flying around

Scholarly peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of subjecting an author's scholarly work, research, or ideas to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field, before a paper describing this work is published in a journal, conference proceedings or as a book. The peer review helps the publisher (that is, the editor-in-chief, the editorial board or the program committee) decide whether the work should be accepted, considered acceptable with revisions, or rejected.

Peer review requires a community of experts in a given (and often narrowly defined) field, who are qualified and able to perform reasonably impartial review. Impartial review, especially of work in less narrowly defined or inter-disciplinary fields, may be difficult to accomplish, and the significance (good or bad) of an idea may never be widely appreciated among its contemporaries. Peer review is generally considered necessary to academic quality and is used in most major scholarly journals. However, peer review does not entirely prevent publication of invalid research,[14] and as experimentally controlled studies of this process are difficult to arrange, direct evidence that peer review improves the quality of published papers is scarce.[15]