Yep. M247 was working so sweet the last 2 days...now all packet loss again. Arrgh!
Unifi Connection Issue to International Server, Occured usually at night 9-11pm
|
|
 Jul 1 2021, 06:17 PM
|
 
Junior Member
546 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Within the Solar System 
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Jul 1 2021, 06:56 PM
|
Senior Member
5,886 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: BM 
|
QUOTE(go626201 @ Jul 1 2021, 05:23 PM) Big joke... means they didn't fix the problemAlways like this-fixed one and create another new problem...    just taichi here and there like usual what are the coincidence when one connection becomes better the other immediately becomes worse like transferring shit from one pocket to another pocket G-17 liked this post
|
|
|
Jul 1 2021, 08:31 PM
|
Senior Member
1,344 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: HEAVEN & HELL
|
QUOTE(go626201 @ Jul 1 2021, 05:23 PM) Big joke... you can check till now.. CDN77 latency is quite stable and also they using PCCW same as M247Always like this-fixed one and create another new problem... is m247 endpoint back to TM got issue. |
|
|
Jul 1 2021, 08:41 PM
|
Senior Member
1,748 posts Joined: Mar 2010
|
QUOTE(heLL_bOy @ Jul 1 2021, 08:31 PM) you can check till now.. CDN77 latency is quite stable and also they using PCCW same as M247 But look at the time in his two graphs. The exact same time CDN77 improved and M247 deteriorated. Too much of a coincidence to put blame solely on M247, no?is m247 endpoint back to TM got issue. |
|
|
Jul 1 2021, 08:50 PM
|
Newbie
31 posts Joined: Sep 2017
|
Anyone facing high latency to singapore server tonight? Normally can get around 40-50ms, now 100ms
|
|
|
Jul 1 2021, 08:53 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,344 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: HEAVEN & HELL
|
QUOTE(G-17 @ Jul 1 2021, 08:41 PM) But look at the time in his two graphs. The exact same time CDN77 improved and M247 deteriorated. Too much of a coincidence to put blame solely on M247, no? source to destination both are using the PCCW same pipe and if really got issue both also will have the same problem.destination back to source might be not the same routed back. CDN77 is using Equinix SG back to TM for M247 i not sure what pipe routed back maybe you could check at your backend. G-17 liked this post
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 1 2021, 09:10 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,748 posts Joined: Mar 2010
|
QUOTE(heLL_bOy @ Jul 1 2021, 08:53 PM) source to destination both are using the PCCW same pipe and if really got issue both also will have the same problem. This is what my [mtr --aslookup sg5-wireguard.mullvad.net] says. Educate me please, bro;destination back to source might be not the same routed back. CDN77 is using Equinix SG back to TM for M247 i not sure what pipe routed back maybe you could check at your backend. CODE ThinkPad (192.168.1.138) 2021-07-01T21:01:35+0800 Keys: Help Display mode Restart statistics Order of fields quit Packets Pings Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. AS??? stupid.router.me 0.0% 72 2.0 6.1 1.2 107.1 17.5 2. AS4788 60.53.xx.xxx 0.0% 72 4.1 6.6 3.0 41.1 7.2 3. AS??? 10.55.106.5 0.0% 72 10.3 16.0 9.0 126.1 20.1 4. AS??? 10.55.50.52 0.0% 71 8.8 10.7 8.0 43.2 5.2 5. AS??? 10.55.37.90 0.0% 71 9.6 12.5 8.5 119.4 14.0 6. AS3491 63-218-166-1.static.pccwglobal.net 0.0% 71 12.1 13.9 10.5 80.3 10.6 7. AS3491 HundredGE0-5-0-0.br03.sin02.pccwbtn.net 42.3% 71 30.8 37.5 30.8 150.1 20.2 8. AS3491 HundredGE0-5-0-0.br03.sin02.pccwbtn.net 41.4% 71 31.7 35.8 30.6 124.6 15.2 9. AS3491 198148metro.tenGigE0-6-0-20.10.br03.sin02.pccwbtn.net 39.4% 71 35.9 35.7 26.0 73.8 8.8 10. AS??? 37.120.220.219 40.0% 71 33.7 57.1 33.7 145.6 27.9 11. AS9009 193.27.15.40 32.4% 71 34.7 33.9 26.5 78.6 7.4 12. AS9009 94.198.43.50 38.0% 71 37.1 34.2 25.7 149.9 18.6 This post has been edited by G-17: Jul 1 2021, 09:11 PM |
|
|
Jul 1 2021, 09:12 PM
|
|
Junior Member
546 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Within the Solar System
|
 Look at this nonsense. When they fixed it, it was perfect. Now, it is worse than before they fixed it. FUUUUUUU. G-17 liked this post
|
|
|
Jul 1 2021, 09:17 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,748 posts Joined: Mar 2010
|
I think maybe @hostingmalaya should try to sell a copy of his aduan/report as a NFT for 0.002435887543 BTC, because I feel this problem won't ever go away.
 |
|
|
Jul 1 2021, 09:19 PM
|
|
Junior Member
546 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Within the Solar System
|
The problem did go away though. It was working great until someone decided to fuck it up again. Sigh.
|
|
|
Jul 1 2021, 09:20 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,344 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: HEAVEN & HELL
|
QUOTE(G-17 @ Jul 1 2021, 09:10 PM) This is what my [mtr --aslookup sg5-wireguard.mullvad.net] says. Educate me please, bro; this MTR is source to destination.CODE ThinkPad (192.168.1.138) 2021-07-01T21:01:35+0800 Keys: Help Display mode Restart statistics Order of fields quit Packets Pings Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. AS??? stupid.router.me 0.0% 72 2.0 6.1 1.2 107.1 17.5 2. AS4788 60.53.xx.xxx 0.0% 72 4.1 6.6 3.0 41.1 7.2 3. AS??? 10.55.106.5 0.0% 72 10.3 16.0 9.0 126.1 20.1 4. AS??? 10.55.50.52 0.0% 71 8.8 10.7 8.0 43.2 5.2 5. AS??? 10.55.37.90 0.0% 71 9.6 12.5 8.5 119.4 14.0 6. AS3491 63-218-166-1.static.pccwglobal.net 0.0% 71 12.1 13.9 10.5 80.3 10.6 7. AS3491 HundredGE0-5-0-0.br03.sin02.pccwbtn.net 42.3% 71 30.8 37.5 30.8 150.1 20.2 8. AS3491 HundredGE0-5-0-0.br03.sin02.pccwbtn.net 41.4% 71 31.7 35.8 30.6 124.6 15.2 9. AS3491 198148metro.tenGigE0-6-0-20.10.br03.sin02.pccwbtn.net 39.4% 71 35.9 35.7 26.0 73.8 8.8 10. AS??? 37.120.220.219 40.0% 71 33.7 57.1 33.7 145.6 27.9 11. AS9009 193.27.15.40 32.4% 71 34.7 33.9 26.5 78.6 7.4 12. AS9009 94.198.43.50 38.0% 71 37.1 34.2 25.7 149.9 18.6 destination to source is when you connected to vpn then do MTR G-17 liked this post
|
|
|
Jul 1 2021, 09:25 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#592
|
|
Junior Member
362 posts Joined: Jan 2011
|
QUOTE(G-17 @ Jul 1 2021, 09:10 PM) This is what my [mtr --aslookup sg5-wireguard.mullvad.net] says. Educate me please, bro; This is mtr from TM to m247 SG.CODE ThinkPad (192.168.1.138) 2021-07-01T21:01:35+0800 Keys: Help Display mode Restart statistics Order of fields quit Packets Pings Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. AS??? stupid.router.me 0.0% 72 2.0 6.1 1.2 107.1 17.5 2. AS4788 60.53.xx.xxx 0.0% 72 4.1 6.6 3.0 41.1 7.2 3. AS??? 10.55.106.5 0.0% 72 10.3 16.0 9.0 126.1 20.1 4. AS??? 10.55.50.52 0.0% 71 8.8 10.7 8.0 43.2 5.2 5. AS??? 10.55.37.90 0.0% 71 9.6 12.5 8.5 119.4 14.0 6. AS3491 63-218-166-1.static.pccwglobal.net 0.0% 71 12.1 13.9 10.5 80.3 10.6 7. AS3491 HundredGE0-5-0-0.br03.sin02.pccwbtn.net 42.3% 71 30.8 37.5 30.8 150.1 20.2 8. AS3491 HundredGE0-5-0-0.br03.sin02.pccwbtn.net 41.4% 71 31.7 35.8 30.6 124.6 15.2 9. AS3491 198148metro.tenGigE0-6-0-20.10.br03.sin02.pccwbtn.net 39.4% 71 35.9 35.7 26.0 73.8 8.8 10. AS??? 37.120.220.219 40.0% 71 33.7 57.1 33.7 145.6 27.9 11. AS9009 193.27.15.40 32.4% 71 34.7 33.9 26.5 78.6 7.4 12. AS9009 94.198.43.50 38.0% 71 37.1 34.2 25.7 149.9 18.6 Hop no.6 is PCCW KUL and pass to PCCW SG on hop no.7 and finally reaching m247 in SG. You may connect to your m247 vpn and try mtr back to your tm 60.53 ip to see how the return route look like. G-17 liked this post
|
|
|
Jul 1 2021, 09:31 PM
|
Junior Member
184 posts Joined: Dec 2015 From: Malaysia
|
I didnt saw any issue on my test IP. Try to MTR both side, TM -> target, and target -> TM G-17 liked this post
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 1 2021, 09:40 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,748 posts Joined: Mar 2010
|
QUOTE(michaelkkl @ Jul 1 2021, 09:25 PM) This is mtr from TM to m247 SG. Okay, but the problem now is cannot even connect back to the same SG server. Even when managed to connect to a different server (sg7 vs sg5 previously) and mtr back to my IP but the trace doesn't even complete.Hop no.6 is PCCW KUL and pass to PCCW SG on hop no.7 and finally reaching m247 in SG. You may connect to your m247 vpn and try mtr back to your tm 60.53 ip to see how the return route look like. CODE My traceroute [v0.93] ThinkPad (10.104.205.96) 2021-07-01T21:36:14+0800 Keys: Help Display mode Restart statistics Order of fields quit Packets Pings Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. AS??? 10.64.0.1 26.9% 108 31.0 32.5 30.9 66.7 4.1 2. AS9009 89.38.225.49 25.0% 108 32.2 32.1 30.9 34.8 0.8 3. AS9009 193.27.15.41 24.1% 108 40.0 38.5 31.7 85.1 9.2 4. AS??? 37.120.220.218 25.0% 108 33.8 33.0 31.1 44.1 2.3 5. AS??? 27.111.229.206 48.1% 108 51.1 51.5 48.1 73.9 4.1 6. (waiting for reply) more than 100 packets sent and still (waiting for reply) at hop #6. Is it perhaps some iptables rule or my router's firewall preventing the trace? O_o? Fuck it lah. Tonight just use JP server. This post has been edited by G-17: Jul 1 2021, 09:45 PM |
|
|
Jul 1 2021, 09:48 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,344 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: HEAVEN & HELL
|
QUOTE(G-17 @ Jul 1 2021, 09:40 PM) Okay, but the problem now is cannot even connect back to the same SG server. Even when managed to connect to a different server (sg7 vs sg5 previously) and mtr back to my IP but the trace doesn't even complete. base on your MTR.. CDN77 also having same route path back to source from hop 5 (27.111.229.206)CODE My traceroute [v0.93] ThinkPad (10.104.205.96) 2021-07-01T21:36:14+0800 Keys: Help Display mode Restart statistics Order of fields quit Packets Pings Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. AS??? 10.64.0.1 26.9% 108 31.0 32.5 30.9 66.7 4.1 2. AS9009 89.38.225.49 25.0% 108 32.2 32.1 30.9 34.8 0.8 3. AS9009 193.27.15.41 24.1% 108 40.0 38.5 31.7 85.1 9.2 4. AS??? 37.120.220.218 25.0% 108 33.8 33.0 31.1 44.1 2.3 5. AS??? 27.111.229.206 48.1% 108 51.1 51.5 48.1 73.9 4.1 6. (waiting for reply) more than 100 packets sent and still (waiting for reply) at hop #6. Is it perhaps some iptables rule or my router's firewall preventing the trace? O_o? Fuck it lah. Tonight just use JP server. so its M247 issue. G-17 liked this post
|
|
|
Jul 1 2021, 09:54 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,748 posts Joined: Mar 2010
|
QUOTE(heLL_bOy @ Jul 1 2021, 09:48 PM) base on your MTR.. CDN77 also having same route path back to source from hop 5 (27.111.229.206) Turns out I entered the wrong IP. here's the full readout;so its M247 issue. CODE My traceroute [v0.93] ThinkPad (10.104.205.96) 2021-07-01T21:49:36+0800 Keys: Help Display mode Restart statistics Order of fields quit Packets Pings Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. AS??? 10.64.0.1 29.4% 51 30.1 28.2 27.1 30.1 0.7 2. AS9009 89.38.225.49 30.0% 51 28.1 30.3 27.7 53.2 5.4 3. AS9009 193.27.15.41 38.0% 50 31.8 37.1 29.3 90.3 13.4 4. AS??? 37.120.220.218 34.7% 50 28.6 29.3 27.0 34.4 1.8 5. AS??? 27.111.229.206 59.2% 50 48.9 48.5 47.5 52.4 1.3 6. AS4788 60.53.xx.xxx 73.5% 50 56.5 57.1 56.0 58.6 0.9 So is there anything I can tell Mullvad? Last time they already switched some transit partner when I had issues, now need to ask them again. But then, once TM switch some other routing next week then problem start again how?.... Sigh, it was soooo damn good the last couple of Level3 days, then the TM idiots went back to PCCW junk and this started again. This post has been edited by G-17: Jul 1 2021, 09:59 PM |
|
|
Jul 1 2021, 10:03 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,344 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: HEAVEN & HELL
|
QUOTE(G-17 @ Jul 1 2021, 09:54 PM) Turns out I entered the wrong IP. here's the full readout; this is from CDN77.. you can see both using 27.111.229.206 back to TMCODE My traceroute [v0.93] ThinkPad (10.104.205.96) 2021-07-01T21:49:36+0800 Keys: Help Display mode Restart statistics Order of fields quit Packets Pings Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. AS??? 10.64.0.1 29.4% 51 30.1 28.2 27.1 30.1 0.7 2. AS9009 89.38.225.49 30.0% 51 28.1 30.3 27.7 53.2 5.4 3. AS9009 193.27.15.41 38.0% 50 31.8 37.1 29.3 90.3 13.4 4. AS??? 37.120.220.218 34.7% 50 28.6 29.3 27.0 34.4 1.8 5. AS??? 27.111.229.206 59.2% 50 48.9 48.5 47.5 52.4 1.3 6. AS4788 60.53.xx.xxx 73.5% 50 56.5 57.1 56.0 58.6 0.9 So is there anything I can tell Mullvad? Last time they already switched some transit partner when I had issues, now need to ask them again. But then, once TM switch some other routing next week then problem start again how?.... Sigh, it was soooo damn good the last couple of Level3 days, then the TM idiots went back to PCCW junk and this started again. CODE HOST: 10g-singapore-kvm-1-89-187- Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. AS60068 89.187.162.60 0.0% 10 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 2. AS60068 185.229.188.170 0.0% 10 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 3. AS??? 27.111.229.206 10.0% 10 17.3 17.1 16.9 17.3 0.0 4. AS??? ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5. AS4788 58.26.239.30 0.0% 10 9.2 9.2 9.1 9.3 0.0 or you consider to have another backup vpn other then this? previously maxis fiber also having the same issue like now its turn out is m247 issue itself. G-17 liked this post
|
|
|
Jul 1 2021, 10:17 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,748 posts Joined: Mar 2010
|
QUOTE(heLL_bOy @ Jul 1 2021, 10:03 PM) this is from CDN77.. you can see both using 27.111.229.206 back to TM Nah, I don't trust majority of commercial VPN providers. Basically any VPN that ask for email during registration and don't accept Monero, I won't use. For now I'll use Mullvad's JP servers. Latency is higher a bit, but no packet loss and relatively high download speeds at the moment.CODE HOST: 10g-singapore-kvm-1-89-187- Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. AS60068 89.187.162.60 0.0% 10 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 2. AS60068 185.229.188.170 0.0% 10 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 3. AS??? 27.111.229.206 10.0% 10 17.3 17.1 16.9 17.3 0.0 4. AS??? ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5. AS4788 58.26.239.30 0.0% 10 9.2 9.2 9.1 9.3 0.0 or you consider to have another backup vpn other then this? previously maxis fiber also having the same issue like now its turn out is m247 issue itself. Previously had my own WireGuard tunnel running on a DigOceanSG Ubuntu droplet, but that was more for performance than privacy, and I shut it down when this Unifi problem got unbearable for me last month. Sign, I'm going to collect all this problematic AS numbers and buy Magnum when lockdown ends. This post has been edited by G-17: Jul 1 2021, 10:19 PM |
|
|
Jul 1 2021, 10:22 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,344 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: HEAVEN & HELL
|
QUOTE(G-17 @ Jul 1 2021, 10:17 PM) Nah, I don't trust majority of commercial VPN providers. Basically any VPN that ask for email during registration and don't accept Monero, I won't use. For now I'll use Mullvad's JP servers. Latency is higher a bit, but no packet loss and relatively high download speeds at the moment. use back DO then.. since now the ping back to normal below 15msPreviously had my own WireGuard tunnel running on a DigOceanSG Ubuntu droplet, but that was more for performance than privacy, and I shut it down when this Unifi problem got unbearable for me last month. Sign, I'm going to collect all this problematic AS numbers and buy Magnum when lockdown ends. but not sure how this last again... once TM check high load traffic in between they will change route or throttling. G-17 liked this post
|
|
|
Jul 1 2021, 10:26 PM
|
|
Junior Member
546 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Within the Solar System
|
QUOTE(G-17 @ Jul 1 2021, 10:17 PM) Nah, I don't trust majority of commercial VPN providers. Basically any VPN that ask for email during registration and don't accept Monero, I won't use. For now I'll use Mullvad's JP servers. Latency is higher a bit, but no packet loss and relatively high download speeds at the moment. Check out airvpn. They are good. Use a throwaway email.Previously had my own WireGuard tunnel running on a DigOceanSG Ubuntu droplet, but that was more for performance than privacy, and I shut it down when this Unifi problem got unbearable for me last month. Sign, I'm going to collect all this problematic AS numbers and buy Magnum when lockdown ends. G-17 liked this post
|
| Change to: |  0.0182sec
 0.37
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 08:43 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.