Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

8 Pages « < 4 5 6 7 8 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Mahathir: F-18 Only Useful For Airshows

views
     
SUSfreeman1
post May 23 2020, 10:37 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
525 posts

Joined: Mar 2015
Tun M is truely one of the highest wisdom world class leader in human history...

Benar-banar langit dan darat perbezaan dengan pengkhianat muyidin
krizalid88_real
post May 23 2020, 10:42 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
28 posts

Joined: Jan 2015
senjata takkan makan tuan

u think america will build and sell something that can be use to destroy them back?
wertty
post May 23 2020, 10:43 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
154 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Petaling Jaya



Dont worry, We will have flying cars capable of carrying nuke missiles

trojandude
post May 23 2020, 10:46 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
117 posts

Joined: Jun 2019
QUOTE(Mai189 @ May 23 2020, 09:34 PM)
The old man was either clearly misguided or utterly did not do his homework.

And so are all of you who believe him.

In the first place, do you even know what source codes are?

You do not need source codes to attack or defend yourself in a western jet.

Utter rubbish. The old man has doomed this country in more ways than you think...
*
he isnt lying, and Malaysia isn't the only one.

You can google it.

US doesn't allow their exported jets to be used unless otherwise authorized by the US. Their jets are basically very restricted

I've read somewhere that these jets cannot target American jets. Not sure if it's extended to all American-made jets, and not just jets from US. I read about this long ago before Mahathir even made this statement.

Yeah he probably did not meant source code (he's not a programmer after all).

This post has been edited by trojandude: May 23 2020, 10:51 PM
Strike
post May 23 2020, 11:04 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
51 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL
Master race just let him talk as long as he continue backdealing like last time
Mai189
post May 23 2020, 11:09 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
http://defense-studies.blogspot.com/2010/0...-ready.html?m=1
sniper on the roof
post May 23 2020, 11:11 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
VIP
23,414 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Taipei
QUOTE(Mai189 @ May 23 2020, 11:09 PM)
Wanna integrate non standard weapons can also...just need to pay Boeing to do it.
Raddus
post May 23 2020, 11:12 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
239 posts

Joined: Mar 2018

QUOTE(rd33 @ May 23 2020, 08:02 PM)
F-18 is like Apple device. You can't install uknown apps or cracked apps (unless u r pro cracker/hacker). Seems to me the F-18 software provided to Malaysia has a lot of restriction. And to get source code? No way US gonna give the source code, someone can leak it to CCP and built their own F-18. So buy Russian planes (maybe Windows alike?) and crack it and install any programs u want.
*
Meanwhile russian fighter jet is like pirated windows get all virus


atreyuangel
post May 23 2020, 11:16 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



QUOTE(trojandude @ May 23 2020, 10:46 PM)
he isnt lying, and Malaysia isn't the only one.

You can google it.

US doesn't allow their exported jets to be used unless otherwise authorized by the US. Their jets are basically very restricted

I've read somewhere that these jets cannot target American jets. Not sure if it's extended to all American-made jets, and not just jets from US. I read about this long ago before Mahathir even made this statement.

Yeah he probably did not meant source code (he's not a programmer after all).
*
yeah he did not lying except that is the situation in the late 90s
plus the interceptor role and air superiority during the 90s is held by the MIG squadron

QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ May 23 2020, 11:11 PM)
Wanna integrate non standard weapons can also...just need to pay Boeing to do it.
*
yes, but all mesti go thru US congress first too
I believe I;ve mention before for the Hornet even to dispose parts with serial no. i.e some type of screw also needed to be documented
ohman
post May 23 2020, 11:18 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,178 posts

Joined: Aug 2014
QUOTE(atreyuangel @ May 23 2020, 11:16 PM)
yeah he did not lying except that is the situation in the late 90s
plus the interceptor role and air superiority during the 90s is held by the MIG squadron
yes, but all mesti go thru US congress first too
I believe I;ve mention before for the Hornet even to dispose parts with serial no. i.e some type of screw also needed to be documented
*
late 90s?

so now Malaysia have full control on F18?

can bomb anyone, anytime ?

laugh.gif

until last year, F16 of pakistan still have such restriction.


but im sure malaysia way better than pakistan innocent.gif
ohman
post May 23 2020, 11:20 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,178 posts

Joined: Aug 2014
QUOTE(trojandude @ May 23 2020, 10:46 PM)


I've read somewhere that these jets cannot target American jets. Not sure if it's extended to all American-made jets, and not just jets from US. I read about this long ago before Mahathir even made this statement.


*
IFF Code restriction maybe, i dont know, i stopped being a mil fag long time already laugh.gif


yed
post May 23 2020, 11:28 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Selangor


QUOTE(wertty @ May 23 2020, 10:43 PM)
Dont worry, We will have flying cars capable of carrying nuke missiles
*
What happen to our flying car project now?
Zarazagoza
post May 23 2020, 11:29 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
246 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
QUOTE(ohman @ May 23 2020, 09:36 PM)
china told you?  laugh.gif
edit : let me add more to this reply la.
1. Russia metallurgy is shit during the 80s and 90s, so the SU 27 variants suffered several cases of aircraft fell apart, cannot pull sustained over G. thats why russia keep having newer variants with stronger bodies.

2. their avionics is shit.
but racist never understand why they are using Made in China product instead of Made in Russia keyboard.

J16 is miles ahead of SU30mkk
1. radar
2. avionics
3. way way stronger body
4. more powerful engine, yes, better than al31f.

this is China, thats why they are world no.2 .

soviet union even at strongest is not world no.2 in terms of economy strength.
*
Lol
Unconfirmed reports claimed the first flight of the J-11D was powered by a new WS-10 variant; the variant reportedly had improved reliability, with a thrust of more than 13t, but less than that of the AL-31F-M1. The flight was revealed in early May 2015.[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shenyang_WS-10
KLthinker91
post May 23 2020, 11:30 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
227 posts

Joined: Feb 2019
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ May 23 2020, 10:16 PM)
lolol yindia got embargoed by us for quitesome time becos nuke yet diorang beli uk stuff  xde hal pun
*
Lolwut

Firstly, records of embargoes are published and easily accessed, you go see if India has been embargoed

Furthermore US India defence relations have been climbing since at least 2005 and now are at an all time high
akutaksempurna
post May 23 2020, 11:30 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
47 posts

Joined: Aug 2008


QUOTE(atreyuangel @ May 23 2020, 10:31 PM)
maybe in 97/98 but not anymore
with the amount of upgrade the FA-18 get for free with FMS money it is one of the most versatile fighter in the RMAF right now
*
Oh okay, that means they can only pull back support in software/hardware maintenance and also ammunition and put sanctions in worse case scenario...
ohman
post May 23 2020, 11:31 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,178 posts

Joined: Aug 2014
QUOTE(Zarazagoza @ May 23 2020, 11:29 PM)
Lol
Unconfirmed reports claimed the first flight of the J-11D was powered by a new WS-10 variant; the variant reportedly had improved reliability, with a thrust of more than 13t, but less than that of the AL-31F-M1. The flight was revealed in early May 2015.[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shenyang_WS-10
*
why laugh?



Zarazagoza
post May 23 2020, 11:32 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
246 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
QUOTE(ohman @ May 23 2020, 11:31 PM)
why laugh?
*
coz PRC butlicker gip wrong info.
KLthinker91
post May 23 2020, 11:33 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
227 posts

Joined: Feb 2019
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(trojandude @ May 23 2020, 10:46 PM)
he isnt lying, and Malaysia isn't the only one.

You can google it.

US doesn't allow their exported jets to be used unless otherwise authorized by the US. Their jets are basically very restricted

I've read somewhere that these jets cannot target American jets. Not sure if it's extended to all American-made jets, and not just jets from US. I read about this long ago before Mahathir even made this statement.

Yeah he probably did not meant source code (he's not a programmer after all).
*
Madey is telling half truths

Yes control is limited

No it doesnt mean you can't use it to attack US or US-made assets

You may have partly limited functionality and you will definitely incur their blacklisting (no shit!) if you go against their interests

But it's not UTTERLY IMPOSSIBLE. Hell if it's physically impossible then there will be no such thing as blue on blue!

Those "sources" you read are to be blunt bullshit

QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ May 23 2020, 11:11 PM)
Wanna integrate non standard weapons can also...just need to pay Boeing to do it.
*
Boring still has to go through US Govt strictly speaking

This post has been edited by KLthinker91: May 23 2020, 11:34 PM
ohman
post May 23 2020, 11:34 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,178 posts

Joined: Aug 2014
QUOTE(Zarazagoza @ May 23 2020, 11:32 PM)
coz PRC butlicker gip wrong info.
*
let me guess, you didnt know which version of AL31 SU30mkk is using right?

adik.

your stupidity is laughable.


stop licking your own finger after removing it from anus la.
atreyuangel
post May 23 2020, 11:40 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



QUOTE(ohman @ May 23 2020, 11:18 PM)
late 90s?

so now Malaysia have full control on F18?

can bomb anyone, anytime ?

  laugh.gif

until last year, F16 of pakistan still have such restriction.
but im sure malaysia way better than pakistan  innocent.gif
*
if you actually follow the RMAF as diligently you follow PLAAF then you should know that the Hornet only commissioned into RMAF service in 1996
and training and familiarization took about a year + before the squadron are fully operational and since then they have been heavily upgraded in order to keep up the current issue and geo political in the area.

And yes we have full control off all the legacy's weapons and thanks to China's presence in the Asean sea with Spratly issue the US have even very generous with the weapons system and support that most TUDM can only dream off in the early 2000.

Pakistani restriction issue is not even the same with Malaysia the political relation with India pretty much sums it all up
even stated during the procurement of the F16 that the bird cannot be used in military issue with India and the reason why the US are investigating the downed of the India MIG as they believed that the F16 is the one that fired the missile. But most of us do think that the bird was the aggressor in that incident that lead to the dawned of the IAF MIG-21

8 Pages « < 4 5 6 7 8 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0227sec    0.45    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 02:19 PM