So that 3.2GHz is using ayam brand PSU?? Some more with 1.3v only while others at 1.4v at least. Maybe can only run it for a while, but later if at load, who knows

thats why dun dare to prime it lor... just let it load windows and take screenshot of it and then downclock it ade..at least till i get a better psu la  ...or else really can see mobo catch fire and psu on fire 

hand picked and sorted for 4 hours in a warehouse of 50 brisbane cpus  tahts why get to use 1.325v in bios..but under stress abit, it jumps to 1.345 x__X...maybe coz of chapalang psu 

are u sure u set it in bios like that..
as i knew.. cpu-z report the voltage incorrectly while reaching 3.2ghz for brisbane..
and for sure it's not stable for that voltage.. if really can works.. it's awesome..

are u sure u set it in bios like that..
as i knew.. cpu-z report the voltage incorrectly while reaching 3.2ghz for brisbane..
and for sure it's not stable for that voltage.. if really can works.. it's awesome..

quite suspicious, but i think he really did that with 1.326v.....

i've told already the trfc by default was set 75ns.. should set 105 atleast to gain more fsb.. for ur info standard KVR is 127ns..
this is quite unpopular coz the setting fall into the advance setting in bios.. and normally we mislooked it..

So trfc also plays part of reaching higher fsb?

@bryanyeo87: what about RAM, you change any vdimm? I must say I'm pretty jealous and make me like "ergh I want money to buy better PSU!!"

looks like the trfc also plays a part of it =/...ofc i change the vdimm...i went max out at 2.3v lolz, that is the max my bios allowed though....and dun nid better psu..use chapalang psu like me xD nyahahahah XD

That one Brisbane right? It is Athlon X2, not Athlon 64 X2 iinm

you actually believed there is Athlon X2 and it's not Athlon64 X2 with typo error? 

I must be left behind

But it's just a name anyway. AMD is soon releasing Phantom ... so having '64' in the name is too gimick-ish.

Hold on, what board are you using? vdimm options are 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 like that? Bcoz mine is like 2.15, 2.25 Don't know whether 2.25 counts as 2.2 or 2.3, but once set 2.25, at BIOS Health and Status shows 2.20 though. Later will try again, currently too busy and in need of using the whole PC

Again, it is Phenom

Yeah, probably the name is just a gimmick though But I can't find its ocability, is it released yet? Some said its potential is similar with 3600+ Brisbane, only difference is its uses lesser watt

Later Phenom X2 also comes with 45W TDP for lower models

Although all current AMD processors retain their original names, the two being introduced today are the first to use AMD's new model numbers. As announced during its Phenom introduction, AMD is dropping the 64 from its product names - the new chips are simply Athlon X2s. The 64-bit race is over now that both AMD and Intel have 64-bit support on a majority of their processors, and now it's time to move on. All previous X2s will still be called Athlon 64 X2s and AMD isn't changing the logo just yet, but eventually it will phase out the old names/model numbers in favor of the new system.

Another attempt at the Quest for 3Ghz .. Still short of 75.5Mhz ..