QUOTE(Candy12 @ May 25 2019, 10:47 PM)
Purchasing anything more than a CAT 4 LTE-A certified device/modem is a waste of money at the moment.
45Mbps is inaccurate. Effectively the full max you can go is 80% of 50Mbps with overheads involved with packets.
"Purchasing anything more than a CAT 4 LTE-A certified device/modem is a waste of money at the moment."
This is true but you are very out of context here, the same thing i could say purchasing any GSM based device/modem is a waste of money in this fiber broadband era, why would you want to pay RM150 per month before tax (digi i150) and pay more for modem (up to RM500+ for a B618) for a speed depending on your location/signal/congestion and all the BS that comes with it when you can just pay RM99 per month for 100/100mbps or RM139 for 500mbps with the best ping and consistency from TIME without the need to spend more for devices like modem/router??
first is availability issue, i dont think i need to explain more, it should be easy where i'm going from here, should be so obvious how out of context my statement is.
the same thing with your statement, you should first understand why they buy B618 (a device that is more than a CAT4 LTE-A) in the first place, this Digi signal coverage is pretty bad for many of them, there are 2 things that have been proven to help:
first is the ability to lock band (this is basic, where even phones can do with some 3rd party app), some cheaper huawei modem can do it too, whats not basic is the ability to lock and use multiple band together (CA - Carrier Aggregation) which huawei B618 can do
second is b618 awesome internal antenna, which is just simply outmatch every other modem in the same price range.
i didn't know all of these 2 months ago, but if you've spent much time digging information in many forums or groups about this specific problem, you would know how famous this B618 is now in MY, at first i was reluctant to type like this, because in one of that group recently got flooded by big wave of people joining because they started to hear about it, and i know for a fact things about networking especially like this, the more people use, the "dangerous" it will get, you wouldnt want more people using digi i150 spamming 150mbps down speed, things like congestion or even digi changing their mind is on the table
"45Mbps is inaccurate. Effectively the full max you can go is 80% of 50Mbps with overheads involved with packets."
oh man, you are going to bring something from networking class back in college? you wouldn't meet as you and her speak a different "language", what she refer and most if not all people here when they talk about the speed they get is simply the result from speedtest.net
again, i think context is so necessary