QUOTE(2feidei @ Sep 28 2017, 07:02 PM)
..And, the one that stop me from driving altogether, they introduce fixed fare, and also they remove the waiting time from the fare.....
Uber Driver Discussion, Anything about Uber
|
|
Sep 29 2017, 12:04 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
12 posts Joined: Nov 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 29 2017, 12:20 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,158 posts Joined: Oct 2013 |
QUOTE(xcamsight @ Sep 29 2017, 12:04 AM) Agreed. Uber most stupid move is Upfront Fare. Thanks to this, many drivers now can rest during peak hours. Coz they want to compete with Grab, no differentiation between Uber and Grab, which they totally forgotten or ignore about drivers, if drivers willing to accept upfront fare, I rather as well choose Grab, at least I know the rider destination, at least I can do a mental calculation if it worth it or not....They thought they invicible, they got plenty of new drivers sign up daily, then, they play around with surge pricing during peak hours (not sure still got or not, last time, can see all map red colour mean surge) For riders, what I would usually do, I open both apps, I just choose the lowest fare. I got no any preference. But, if both fare similar, then, I choose Grab, coz Grab got rewards point Another thing I dislike about Uber, last time rider apps, they got show you the surge, ask you to keyed in the surge rate to confirm acceptance of the ride, now, they quietly tell u upfront fare, which can be surge pricing without the rider know....if you not familiar with the usual fare, or dunno how it work, u bulat bulat kena tipu by Uber......very unethical business model |
|
|
Sep 29 2017, 12:22 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#183
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
73 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(2feidei @ Sep 28 2017, 07:02 PM) Hahahah Ride-sharing business just a nice term to entice you to join.....unofficially, you are just (previously) unlicensed taxi sapu Is e-hailing public transport? Lots of view points on should driver know the price/destination before pickup, and should driver be force to pickup non-agreeable job? my own personal view, if e-hailing is public transport, then yes, driver need to pickup all, but if e-hailing is not public transport then driver should have the say I would put e-hailing as not public transport Why not let the free market decide on the correct fare+destination? (if drivers are not picking some fare+destination, just means there is a price mismatch) Then again, e-hailing in under SPAD ( Suruhanjaya Pengangkutan Awam Darat ) - public transport if e-hailing need to behave like public transport, there should be no option to accept pickup (all pickup is mandatory), no cancellation is allowed unless vehicle got problem. Rider rating will be discontinued, as all pickup is mandatory .... and e-hailing drivers get some subsidies for doing public transport note: those Taxi association really got no head, if they do, they just need demand fair competition (e-hailing must do mandatory pickup) and you would see e-haling drivers quitting by the lorry loads |
|
|
Sep 29 2017, 10:55 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
23 posts Joined: May 2013 |
Unhappy drivers, lead lower ratings for riders. Then riders return 'favour' to drivers. Drivers kena ban. Uber start hunting for new drivers. New drivers then become unhappy and the cycle goes on.
|
|
|
Sep 29 2017, 11:30 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,821 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
|
|
|
Sep 29 2017, 11:56 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
998 posts Joined: May 2014 |
QUOTE(tanyuethan @ Sep 29 2017, 10:55 AM) Unhappy drivers, lead lower ratings for riders. Then riders return 'favour' to drivers. Drivers kena ban. Uber start hunting for new drivers. New drivers then become unhappy and the cycle goes on. new drivers will become old/ experienced drivers very fast. lol . |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 29 2017, 01:02 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2017 |
QUOTE(JimbeamofNRT @ Sep 28 2017, 04:34 PM) Seriously, as a driver, we have the right to know the destination of the passenger and we have the right to decide either to take the job or not. +100It's my car, damn it. Stupid Uber owns nothing. As if Uber drivers make way more than their competitors. Why other competitor such as Grab can allow this ? Even Lyft is also allowing it ? By not allowing drivers to see destination, they can perform a lot of hanky-panky stuffs. QUOTE(jasontantenghuat @ Sep 28 2017, 05:58 PM) One of the reason Uber started was because taxi drivers were rejecting customers due to the destinations. You won't be bothered about destination if you are a full-time driver.I haven't driven in a year but when I was driving, I wasn't too fussy about destinations. Got Genting and KLIA a few times though but that time, there's a high chance you would get a returning trip. You won't be bothered about destination if you are earn better than those that can see destination. But this is not the case. And 1 year ago is a long time in this ride-hailing industry. You see changes every month. |
|
|
Sep 29 2017, 01:14 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
116 posts Joined: Dec 2009 From: Petaling Jaya |
Yesterday evening rush hour, a queue came in and stated Long Trip (40+ mins), and at 2.7x surge. I thought, ho sei liao, thought airport.
Mana tau Amcorp Mall to Kota Damansara. One hour jam to go the 18km distance. But still ok la, gross fare was RM50+. One hours work. This post has been edited by ieian81: Sep 29 2017, 01:15 PM |
|
|
Sep 29 2017, 01:37 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2017 |
Also ho sei what.
rm40 nett for 1 hour, some more to high demand area. Airport is empty trip back. |
|
|
Sep 29 2017, 02:07 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
983 posts Joined: Aug 2015 |
|
|
|
Sep 29 2017, 03:31 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#191
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,902 posts Joined: Sep 2012 |
QUOTE(jasontantenghuat @ Sep 28 2017, 05:58 PM) One of the reason Uber started was because taxi drivers were rejecting customers due to the destinations. bro, nowadays too many drivers on the road lah. need to wait quite long to get customer in KLIA. I haven't driven in a year but when I was driving, I wasn't too fussy about destinations. Got Genting and KLIA a few times though but that time, there's a high chance you would get a returning trip. |
|
|
Sep 29 2017, 03:36 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#192
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,902 posts Joined: Sep 2012 |
QUOTE(ikanair @ Sep 29 2017, 12:22 AM) Is e-hailing public transport? Lots of view points on should driver know the price/destination before pickup, and should driver be force to pickup non-agreeable job? my own personal view, if e-hailing is public transport, then yes, driver need to pickup all, but if e-hailing is not public transport then driver should have the say I would put e-hailing as not public transport Why not let the free market decide on the correct fare+destination? (if drivers are not picking some fare+destination, just means there is a price mismatch) Then again, e-hailing in under SPAD ( Suruhanjaya Pengangkutan Awam Darat ) - public transport if e-hailing need to behave like public transport, there should be no option to accept pickup (all pickup is mandatory), no cancellation is allowed unless vehicle got problem. Rider rating will be discontinued, as all pickup is mandatory .... and e-hailing drivers get some subsidies for doing public transport note: those Taxi association really got no head, if they do, they just need demand fair competition (e-hailing must do mandatory pickup) and you would see e-haling drivers quitting by the lorry loads QUOTE(Utopia Angel @ Sep 29 2017, 01:02 PM) +100 Well said. at least as a driver we need to know where is the destination before we pick up the customer.It's my car, damn it. Stupid Uber owns nothing. As if Uber drivers make way more than their competitors. Why other competitor such as Grab can allow this ? Even Lyft is also allowing it ? By not allowing drivers to see destination, they can perform a lot of hanky-panky stuffs. You won't be bothered about destination if you are a full-time driver. You won't be bothered about destination if you are earn better than those that can see destination. But this is not the case. And 1 year ago is a long time in this ride-hailing industry. You see changes every month. |
|
|
Sep 29 2017, 06:13 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
116 posts Joined: Dec 2009 From: Petaling Jaya |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 29 2017, 06:21 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
983 posts Joined: Aug 2015 |
|
|
|
Sep 29 2017, 06:57 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2017 |
|
|
|
Oct 1 2017, 05:13 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
998 posts Joined: May 2014 |
can't get it...
sometimes ublur offer morning quest but sometimes evening quest? |
|
|
Oct 1 2017, 05:39 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
12 posts Joined: Nov 2016 |
QUOTE(bcombat @ Oct 1 2017, 05:13 PM) either not enough or no drivers online during the after work rush hours, demand is high but no cars so their 25% This post has been edited by xcamsight: Oct 1 2017, 05:40 PM |
|
|
Oct 1 2017, 06:37 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,158 posts Joined: Oct 2013 |
QUOTE(ikanair @ Sep 29 2017, 12:22 AM) Is e-hailing public transport? Lots of view points on should driver know the price/destination before pickup, and should driver be force to pickup non-agreeable job? my own personal view, if e-hailing is public transport, then yes, driver need to pickup all, but if e-hailing is not public transport then driver should have the say I would put e-hailing as not public transport Why not let the free market decide on the correct fare+destination? (if drivers are not picking some fare+destination, just means there is a price mismatch) Then again, e-hailing in under SPAD ( Suruhanjaya Pengangkutan Awam Darat ) - public transport if e-hailing need to behave like public transport, there should be no option to accept pickup (all pickup is mandatory), no cancellation is allowed unless vehicle got problem. Rider rating will be discontinued, as all pickup is mandatory .... and e-hailing drivers get some subsidies for doing public transport note: those Taxi association really got no head, if they do, they just need demand fair competition (e-hailing must do mandatory pickup) and you would see e-haling drivers quitting by the lorry loads The question you should ask is whether Uber or Grab is a ride-sharing concept or another new public transport option in town? Uber was created with objective as ride sharing concept. If you had read the story of how Uber got conceptualized, it was because the fella got frustrated at dunno if not mistaken San Francisco, during peak hours, he unable to get a cab, while at same time, noticed a lot of car with just driver. So, why don't create an tools to match this empty car driver with someone who need a ride, in return for some money to share the gasoline cost? Then, come in Grab to take a share of the pie, copying the same concept, maybe due to their frustration, they created MyTeksi, to match riders and taxi drivers, but, then, knowing very well Malaysian taxi drivers, super choosy, I even experienced before, request ride thru MyTeksi, saw at least 10-20 taxi around, but, none want to accept. So, if Uber got this concept, why don't copy them, instead of rely on taxi, we ask private vehicle owner. So, here come the birth of new public transport, anyone with a car can offer a ride to anyone. But, somehow, this idea was too alien, too far advance to majority of people, to the government, therefore, somehow along the way, it being repackaged as e-hailing public transport. And, by way of their marketing, u can see they keep saying you can earn RM10k per month working part-time, etc (which we all now already known, it bullshit, not realistic and after deducting all the cost, it far from it)....indirectly, telling u it can be a full time income generating tools too. Therefore, conclusion, both Uber and Grab is just another form of public transport. If you ask me, like it or not, the drivers must accept destination within the service area for all accepted ride request. And, at same time, they must be also fairly compensated, at least like taxi fare or given incentives like taxi. All the rating remain, as u know how good our SPAD work, else, you won't still see so many bad taxi drivers still around conning others. And, riders must also register too, so bad riders can be banned too. This also explain why last time, when Uber only accept credit card, riders all are well behaved, coz they know Uber had their detail. Now, I can create just a fake rider account with prepaid number, request a ride, and act pain in ass for the driver, and even if I got suspended, I can create a new one with new prepaid number. Or, I can even rob the driver this way, if I want. E-hailing is just another term, nothing to do with what public transport or private transport. It like you go bank withdraw money, either u can go counter or go ATM. Both objective still same.....question is is Uber and Grab is ride sharing or new public transport? |
|
|
Oct 1 2017, 10:37 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,821 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
|
|
|
Oct 1 2017, 10:41 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,158 posts Joined: Oct 2013 |
QUOTE(lowya @ Oct 1 2017, 10:37 PM) ride share = driver can choose customer/destination I also confuse.... public transport = driver cannot choose customer/destination In their recruitment for riders, keep saying easily earn 10k with part time and flexible work hours which sound like ride share but, then, dammed lots of regulations, cannot reject customers or destination, riders is everything, etc, plus now with new government regulations, dunno what new license, puspakom inspection, etc.....sound like public transport Anyway, used to be a good avenue for additional income, not much, just to tide over difficult times, now no more.....too much hassle |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0187sec
0.63
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 25th November 2025 - 10:35 AM |