QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jun 21 2017, 11:11 PM)
Correction: this Optima GT is as old as the Sonata LF that was already revealed in 2014 and launched in Korea followed by America. We get Sonata LF only in early 2015. Optima only released here after more than 2 years, going to be 3 years where Sonata new rise 2018 is about to replace Sonata LF. Which means Optima too will come up with replacement as answer to new Camry 2018.
Before Volvo was sold to Geely China, the Ford ecoboost dual VVT and Mazda SVT technology already available. You said Volvo high FC by judging from Ford and Mazda older generation engine seems inaccurate.
The Camry didn't take long to release in Malaysia and Thailand. Quite on time, same goes to Honda and now Mazda also on time already. Instead, Korean end up like Nissan, launch new models only when about to phase out and keep selling old models.
I understand, the underpinnings of the optima is indeed of the sonata LF, but the new optima product launch with that underpinning was close to 2 years later, circa end 2015 to early 2016. Depends on which way to look at it. And the so called new rise sonata is stronger facelift of the sonata LF, akin to what mercedes did to the w204 facelift, not a completely new generation model. New generation models will most likely port in the 8 speeder from the development in genesis and cadenza.Before Volvo was sold to Geely China, the Ford ecoboost dual VVT and Mazda SVT technology already available. You said Volvo high FC by judging from Ford and Mazda older generation engine seems inaccurate.
The Camry didn't take long to release in Malaysia and Thailand. Quite on time, same goes to Honda and now Mazda also on time already. Instead, Korean end up like Nissan, launch new models only when about to phase out and keep selling old models.
From the fuelly app fuel consumption numbers i look, the numbers don't look really fantastic. Either the drivers like to push ford cars harder or it is really not as good in real life compared to specification. I have no idea how Volvo did their powertrain revamp, but from a realistic point of view, since Volvo had a lump sum of cash injection from Geely, no point wasting the resources to license ford/mazda's IP. Rather, they went big and did a whole lot further. Could be in the blueprint for quite sometime, but hampered by resource constrains to fully develop their ideas to a marketable product.
Nissan is too busy digesting all the buy ups and also management change since Charlos Gohn is in transition to let Nissan have more independence in decision making. They are behind the curve everywhere in the world other than their US truck and SUV markets.
This post has been edited by wkc5657: Jun 22 2017, 01:27 PM
Jun 22 2017, 01:23 PM

Quote
0.0282sec
0.98
6 queries
GZIP Disabled