Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Kia Optima GT 2017 at rm179k

views
     
kluseng
post Jun 18 2017, 09:30 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
473 posts

Joined: Apr 2015
QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jun 15 2017, 08:29 PM)
Everyone knows why I don't post tech talk that would benefit Korean cars at the moment. I'm just news commentator posting news and results. Not helping the losing brand to win this time. The Passat turbocharged is at good offer now, cheaper than Accord 2.4 and Optima GT. Why would people pay so much for Optima GT that will end up like Mondeo 2.0T when they can buy Passat turbo at much lower price? Top up a bit more can get Volvo.
*
The Passat turbo is RM199K OTR without insurance. With the RM15K discount for Raya promotion it comes to RM184K which is still RM9K more than Optima GT at RM175K OTR without insurance.

But let's say if both cars are sold at the same price why would people buy an Optima instead of a Passat? There are many possible reasons I can think of:

1. A Korean car is generally more reliable than a Continental car.
2. Passat will be more expensive to maintain after warranty with higher cost of spare parts, harder to repair and more expensive labour.
3. 6 speed auto transmission is more reliable than DSG and smoother in low speed traffic.
4. Passat's adaptive dampers are wear and tear items and are damn expensive to replace.
5. Optima GT is CBU from Korea. Passat is CKD in Pekan with our unimpressive assembly quality.
6. Optima has higher resale value. In 3 years expect the Optima to maintain 60% of its value while the Passat will only be worth 40%.
Edit:
7. The DSG is a wear and tear item which will need replacement at some point.
8. VW's mechatronic is another unreliable item with high failure rate. Failure cannot be predicted and when it fails your car is immobilized.

So you want to top up a bit more for a Volvo? That's a very expensive car to maintain.

This post has been edited by kluseng: Jun 19 2017, 08:23 AM
kluseng
post Jun 18 2017, 09:43 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
473 posts

Joined: Apr 2015
QUOTE(dstl1128 @ Jun 18 2017, 09:39 PM)
Again Bobby says continental cheap to maintain tongue.gif.

Really that heated seats in Optima GT hnnnnnng. It is just lacking those safety in Ioniq HEV+ - for god sake it is ~RM180k and none of those HEV+ safety. WTF. When Honda release Accord Hybrid with Honda Sensing at that price, good luck Optima GT - back to drawing board.

Just like Ioniq HEV now got kicked by Jazz Sport Hybrid. When they add Honda Sensing to Civic or even City or Jazz Hybrid, HEV+ pricing can just vanish in the background.
*
Why everybody must compare with Ioniq HEV+ features? How many cars in our market have those features?


This post has been edited by kluseng: Jun 18 2017, 09:45 PM
kluseng
post Jun 21 2017, 12:58 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
473 posts

Joined: Apr 2015
If Camry 2.0 turbo reach here it will be priced >rm200K.

kluseng
post Jun 26 2017, 10:32 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
473 posts

Joined: Apr 2015
Let's just stick to discussion about Optima GT instead of sidetracking to Korean car market share.
kluseng
post Jun 26 2017, 03:22 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
473 posts

Joined: Apr 2015
QUOTE(Yapmy @ Jun 26 2017, 12:30 PM)
In my opinion, I would take a Passat B8 2.0 anytime and any day over this Optima. Test drive both and you'll know why.
*
If your only criteria is fun to drive than of course Passat but the overall ownership experience must take into account maintenance. A Passat is more expensive and troublesome to maintain as DSG, mechatronic, coil packs and adaptive dampers are high failure items. Do you have alternative transport if your car lands in the workshop for weeks?

I'm not saying an Optima is cheap to maintain but it shouldn't be too different from a D-segment Jap car. Any Optima/Sonata owners can give their input?

kluseng
post Jun 26 2017, 03:51 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
473 posts

Joined: Apr 2015
QUOTE(KennyKB @ Jun 26 2017, 03:38 PM)
As an Optima owner for 10 years (pre-K5) let me give you an idea. I exclude tyres as they are consumable items which depends on how much you travel.

Average per year over 10 years: RM2400
Excluding first 3 years as not typical, average from 4th to 10th year: RM2950
Average mileage per year: 22,000 km

I don't think the GT will be different by a lot. Bear in mind that my Optima was using timing belt which required changing every 60,000 km. The new Optima should use timing chain which doesn't need replacement.
*
Thank you for your input.

It's good that we are getting back on track to relevant discussion. Please don't feed the troll any more.

kluseng
post Jun 30 2017, 11:53 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
473 posts

Joined: Apr 2015
QUOTE(Ginny88 @ Jun 30 2017, 09:49 AM)
Nobody has any interest to buy the Optima GT? Even in the Optima thread in Car Club also no interest. Has Naza gone too far on the pricing this time?
*
I think for the power the price (rm175k) is worth it but unfortunately price doesn't match brand perception. If Passat 2.0TSI (rm200k) is sold at this price there will be a waiting list.


This post has been edited by kluseng: Jun 30 2017, 11:56 AM
kluseng
post Jul 1 2017, 11:24 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
473 posts

Joined: Apr 2015
QUOTE(Ginny88 @ Jul 1 2017, 10:18 AM)
You guys think RM180K for a 242HP/353Nm car is expensive? The alternatives are Passat 2.0TSI, MB C200, BMW 320i, Audi A4, Infinity Q50, etc which are all more expensive. The Volvo V40 T5 comes closest in price but do you like that weird crossover shape and do you want to maintain a Volvo? I think the Optima GT will sell, it's just a matter of the market getting used to the price. Those who can look beyond the brand can see that it is value for money.
*
^
This. Or would you rather pay RM200K for a Passat 2.0 where the roof lining comes off as "normal" wear and tear?

The Optima GT is certainly on my shortlist after I pay off my existing car loan. I have no problem with its price and I'm not brand snobbish. Show me another car with equivalent power and torque and better value for money and I'll consider it too. Volvo not considered. It isn't a car you can keep and sleep soundly without warranty. Nor a Passat for that matter.


This post has been edited by kluseng: Jul 1 2017, 11:25 AM
kluseng
post Jul 5 2017, 10:42 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
473 posts

Joined: Apr 2015
What did I tell you guys about not feeding the troll? It's pointless to argue with him and the thread becomes an endless diatribe about the politics of Korean cars.


 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0170sec    0.74    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 02:16 PM