QUOTE(Vcys86 @ Nov 10 2018, 08:18 PM)
Haha..Let me rephrase...For PRS...is CIMB ex Japan - Class C performing better than rest in recent 3 yrs?
Probably long term Nav appreciate is much more important than volatility...since it's "long-term" ?
on this question,....For PRS...is CIMB ex Japan - Class C performing better than rest in recent 3 yrs? Probably long term Nav appreciate is much more important than volatility...since it's "long-term" ?
looking at the past 3 yrs annualised performance.....YES
but some would says...looking at the past 3 yrs risk reward numbers...not that worth it too.....taking so much risk (100%~450% extra risk/volatility) for just an added 1~2% extra annualised returns
but it is up to individual especially those that stick to the notion that "long term Nav appreciate is much more important than volatility...since it's "long-term"
since those are the PAST/RECENT 3 yrs historical results, I would focus on positioning for the next 3 yrs, hence not the past/recent 3 yrs....
thus i would phrase it as this, if I wanted to seek for the better ROI option..... "For PRS...will CIMB ex Japan - Class C have better chances of performing better in terms of appreciation than rest in
but would phrase it as this, if I wanted to seek for the better risk reward option ....."For PRS...will CIMB ex Japan - Class C have better risk reward than rest in
This post has been edited by MUM: Nov 11 2018, 10:47 AM
Attached thumbnail(s)
Nov 11 2018, 10:26 AM

Quote
0.0239sec
1.02
6 queries
GZIP Disabled