For PRS...is the best bet still with CIMB ex Japan - Class C?
FundSuperMart v18 (FSM) MY : Online UT Platform, UT DIY : Babystep to Investing :D
FundSuperMart v18 (FSM) MY : Online UT Platform, UT DIY : Babystep to Investing :D
|
|
Nov 9 2018, 08:23 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
524 posts Joined: Jun 2007 |
For PRS...is the best bet still with CIMB ex Japan - Class C?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 10 2018, 02:23 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
524 posts Joined: Jun 2007 |
QUOTE(MUM @ Nov 9 2018, 08:26 AM) "best bet" in terms of shortest time it takes for the NAV to rise in the next 3 months? I think PRS would be long term investment? instead of 3 months performance maybe 3 year performance instead? "best bet" in terms of the lower volatility in the next 3 months? "best bet" in terms of chances of making some money in the next 3 months? or .... please elaborate your terms for "best bet" |
|
|
Nov 10 2018, 08:18 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
524 posts Joined: Jun 2007 |
Haha..Let me rephrase...For PRS...is CIMB ex Japan - Class C performing better than rest in recent 3 yrs?
Probably long term Nav appreciate is much more important than volatility...since it's "long-term" ? |
|
|
Nov 11 2018, 08:44 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
524 posts Joined: Jun 2007 |
QUOTE(MUM @ Nov 11 2018, 10:26 AM) on this question,....For PRS...is CIMB ex Japan - Class C performing better than rest in recent 3 yrs? Thanks for your summary table there. looking at the past 3 yrs annualised performance.....YES but some would says...looking at the past 3 yrs risk reward numbers...not that worth it too.....taking so much risk (100%~450% extra risk/volatility) for just an added 1~2% extra annualised returns but it is up to individual especially those that stick to the notion that "long term Nav appreciate is much more important than volatility...since it's "long-term" since those are the PAST/RECENT 3 yrs historical results, I would focus on positioning for the next 3 yrs, hence not the past/recent 3 yrs.... thus i would phrase it as this, if I wanted to seek for the better ROI option..... "For PRS...will CIMB ex Japan - Class C have better chances of performing better in terms of appreciation than rest in but would phrase it as this, if I wanted to seek for the better risk reward option ....."For PRS...will CIMB ex Japan - Class C have better risk reward than rest in Will either top up CIMB ex Japan -Class C or maybe split some into Am REIT |
| Change to: | 0.0597sec
0.41
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 11:43 AM |