QUOTE(fun_feng @ Mar 8 2017, 04:16 PM)
Maybe I did not make my sentence clearer...
What i meant was the initial tax relief you got when amortised (new word to me) over a long period of time, the advantage is probably not going to worth it for all the hassle of PRS..
E.g. you get 20% tax rebate from the PRS, and you still have 20 years before you can withdraw this money. This works out to roughly 1% p.a. which meansĀ whatever your PRS return was that year, you add 1% return to it.
So this versus you put this money into FSM or whatever and actively manage it whereby you are free to choose between hundreds of UT products and you are free to withdraw all during a freefall..
Hope you get the gist of what I am trying to say, I aint well-versed in economic terms.. I am not disputing the power of compound interest or UT in general
My point is there are pros and cons and probably more cons than what ppl thought.
E.g. If we have a retiree-gonna-be, then this PRS income tax relief is a no brainer, since he is going to get his money back within a few years
It's not so simple because you have to consider the tax returns as a form of capital.
Lets assume you have 3k and you can
either invest in PRS or unit trust.
If you invest in unit trust:-
Investment capital unit trust:- RM3k
If you invest in PRS:-
Invstment capital unit trust : RM720 (24% of 3k)
Investment capital PRS: RM3k
So you start of with a total higher investment capital if you go through the PRS route.
But I do agree if your tax bracket is lower than 20%, you probably better of starting with unit trust and when your tax bracket exceed the 20% range , start investing in PRS.
Now at 20 years whether or not you're better off with PRS or Unit Trust depends on PRS returns and unit trust returns.
This post has been edited by Drian: Mar 9 2017, 09:58 AM