QUOTE(am3 @ Aug 11 2007, 05:00 PM)
Hello all.
This is my first post and i'm thinking of getting mylarone or mylarthree.
Between the two of them, which one is more accurate or analytical? Which one is more true?
I am using it for clinical purpose.
Thank you.
If you are looking forward to use a powerful amp, get mylarone xb, good amping capabilities.
QUOTE(am3 @ Aug 11 2007, 08:05 PM)
I don't have msn mail. only got yahoo.
I mean that the iem gives sound that is accurate to the original recording. meaning no coloration, or excessive here and there. i think sony's earphone is not accurate, it distort the original sound, make it more boomy, and the music will sound different than studio recording.
I want a more analytical sound. No distortion so that i can hear the recording as it is recorded. distortion or excessive equalizing might gives a more pleasant sound but it could be distorted....
So i want it to sound like it was recorded in the studio, with no addition and distortion.
hope i make myself clear...
reading this forum just want me to get it these baby more and more...
I want to know if the mylarone or mylarthree produce more accurate sound. mylarthree is better built, right? but if mylarone is more true or accurate, i might get this one instead.
Added on August 11, 2007, 8:08 pmanother thing,
what is the claimed frequency response of mylarone and mylarthree?
Also is the build quality good? The cable is okay?
Added on August 11, 2007, 8:12 pmwhich one is better for classical, or symphony?
The frequency response is 20~20kmhz. But then I need to confirm again.
Again, IMHO mylar2 is better for classical.
QUOTE(am3 @ Aug 12 2007, 12:57 AM)
Yeah...
maybe i have to go mylarthree...

You have another options here dude.
Get the yuins.
PK1, 2, 3 tailored to your budget. (Suggest a PK2

)
This post has been edited by walabies: Aug 12 2007, 02:17 AM