QUOTE(Kyan0411 @ Aug 20 2021, 05:51 PM)
Doubt can get back because TD-i rates are indicative. Banks have discretion not to fulfil that advertised rate but yeah, it attracts bad reputation to them
If it is really a system error (i.e.somehow the various parts dealing with the advertisement, placement, acknowledgement/receipt, display of placement details, final calculation and payment do not jive due to some lack in checking the work, coordination or programming or possibly using copy and paste old program or new program for 2.40 %, then I think HL should and probably will pay up the difference. It is just too silly to have a bad reputation for "small sums" like this especially if it is just a technical error. Correcting it will actually burnish their credentials as a trustworthy bank and improve customer relations and business stability and growth, versus banks with unsavoury behaviour. There is a lot of difference in having business sense and killing oneself with the black and white legal provisions.
Normally we should note that the following things that can happen with enough experience.
1) The actual implementation of the promotion is delayed from the stated Starting Date of the promotion. This is not an uncommon occurrence probably due to some technical or administrative or not able to meet the target implementation deadline technically. Usually the banks do not say they are delayed
but it would be a good thing if Bank Negara Malaysia makes it a rule that banks should at least give a notice on their internet banking website openly instead of just keeping the embarrassment, but show their openness as a good banking practice.
2) The rate is actually reduced due to very good response and thus achieved/nearly achieving the targetted fund to be collected.
Again, it would be good if the banks can proudly post this quickly on their websites with the Revised Ending Date of their promo replacing the Original Ending Date.3) The bank wants to stop the promo early by a certain date because of OPR or some other fears/events that can impact their cashflow or financial position or ability to pay comfortably.
Again notification on their websites on their Revised Ending Date for the promo should be done fast.Is it too much to ask the banks, Association of Banks, or BNM to do something simple and honourable like early and fast notification of Revised Ending Date for promos?4) The promo is replace with one with a higher more competitive rate;offer after the bank finds out that they won't achieve anything needed. In this case, the errors are in not changing the Starting Date or the terms if they are changed such as lock-up in CASA or FD:CASA ratio.
For some reason, the FD people in the banks do not usually seem to have any way to make the persons handling bank website or T&C to do a proper revision on their bank website documents.
With Finance Minister from bank, maybe can hope can do something to reform the shortcomings and slacking practices in Malaysian banks to raise the level to something more respectable? If little achievement also cannot do, what hope for bigger achievements to be done well?I hope readers will support and make known the kinds of improvements or reforms they want to improve Malaysian banks.This post has been edited by Deal Hunter: Aug 20 2021, 08:50 PM