Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 FundSuperMart v16 (FSM) MY : Online UT Platform, UT DIY : Babystep to Investing :D

views
     
frankzane
post Dec 22 2016, 06:52 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
664 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(vincabby @ Dec 21 2016, 02:23 PM)
usually ads to lure ppl into unit trust is 10% per annum from principal earned. so have your UT reached 10? maybe you feel it's the best time to take it now. rule of thumb is always higher than EPF and FD returns.
*
icon_idea.gif
frankzane
post Dec 22 2016, 06:55 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
664 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(Avangelice @ Dec 21 2016, 02:24 PM)
up to your prerogative.
different people have different way of doing things. some may think by doing so they can lock down the profits and place them to a stable fixed income fund. others have more risk appetite that they feel they can stomach the lost of the profits to get better returns. both have their merits.

example.

my Manulife India gave me a healthy returns of 15% back in October/November. I didn't cash out. post trump my returns have reduced to 5%.

1) I could have cashed out my profits and invested in US

or

2) I kept my profits in belief India will do well next year.

both in the hopes that I get a healthy returns.

"are not all investments built on hopes?"
-Avangelice

*
Okok...
wodenus
post Dec 22 2016, 07:00 PM

Tree Octopus
********
All Stars
14,990 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Avangelice @ Dec 22 2016, 11:25 AM)
I'm small fish la bro. lol
you can do this. say for this month you have 1k to put into your portfolio.

you can place 400myr into your fixed income, 200 to India, 200 to US, 200 to Ponzi 2.0.

if you have only myr 500 allocate per month, this month you allocate 300 for fixed income and another 200 to India. next month 300 for fixed income and 200 to US.

some of us here advocate 100% equity in the portfolio which is to me has high returns but very risky. I prefer to have a fixed income to have a place to lock my profits.

also gold is being bashed up because of US rates. I have no answer for that as I never believed in investing in precious metals.
*
Yea like me.. for me risk is risk. There's no such thing as high risk, low risk smile.gif lots of people have the mistaken impression that you can't lose money in fixed income.. but you can. US raised rates.. plans to raise more later maybe? rates are usually inverse of bond yield.. rates go up, bonds come down.

Make no sense long term to hold bonds, given that the US might raise it a bit more later.
Avangelice
post Dec 22 2016, 07:11 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,272 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(wodenus @ Dec 22 2016, 07:00 PM)
Yea like me.. for me risk is risk. There's no such thing as high risk, low risk smile.gif lots of people have the mistaken impression that you can't lose money in fixed income.. but you can. US raised rates.. plans to raise more later maybe? rates are usually inverse of bond yield.. rates go up, bonds come down.

Make no sense long term to hold bonds, given that the US might raise it a bit more later.
*
well many tiers of investments.

Tier 1 Money market
Tier 2 Fixed Income
Tier 3 Balance funds
Tier 4 Equity.

for me fixed income beats FD by a long run and when you are helping managing your wife's portfolio, it's better to have a FI and balance fund. you dare to set all equity for her meh. I don't want o. she already say if I lose her money I'll need to top up for her.

ngaiti.
wodenus
post Dec 22 2016, 07:32 PM

Tree Octopus
********
All Stars
14,990 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Avangelice @ Dec 22 2016, 07:11 PM)
well many tiers of investments.

Tier 1 Money market
Tier 2 Fixed Income
Tier 3 Balance funds
Tier 4 Equity.

for me fixed income beats FD by a long run and when you are helping managing your wife's portfolio, it's better to have a FI and balance fund. you dare to set all equity for her meh. I don't want o. she already say if I lose her money I'll need to top up for her.

ngaiti.
*
If that is the case then you'll have to top up first day when she loses 2% smile.gif

_azam13
post Dec 22 2016, 07:41 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
200 posts

Joined: Mar 2015


US stock market is freaking expensive... they are already pricing in "growth" they haven't seen yet.. P/E +2 std dev above mean.. im not sure if earnings are going to grow that much.. I think correction is due.. anyone can convince me otherwise?

After so much outflow, KLSE actually starting to look attractive though.. but earnings have to deliver
wodenus
post Dec 22 2016, 08:19 PM

Tree Octopus
********
All Stars
14,990 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(frankzane @ Dec 21 2016, 02:13 PM)
Is it not wise to keep the profit just to see it to go down (your second assumption)? Let's say I have profited RM100; should or should not I take the money out?
*
Rule of thumb.. in the long run everything goes up. Local markets don't have that long a history, but you can see it in the US and UK markets. I don't plan to take it out ever. It will always be there.

This post has been edited by wodenus: Dec 22 2016, 08:20 PM
puchongite
post Dec 22 2016, 08:27 PM

20k VIP Club
*********
All Stars
33,615 posts

Joined: May 2008
QUOTE(_azam13 @ Dec 22 2016, 07:41 PM)
US stock market is freaking expensive... they are already pricing in "growth" they haven't seen yet.. P/E +2 std dev above mean.. im not sure if earnings are going to grow that much.. I think correction is due.. anyone can convince me otherwise?

After so much outflow, KLSE actually starting to look attractive though.. but earnings have to deliver
*
Personal i think for KLSE to regain growth momentum, it needs foreign funds. Local funds are the 'follow the wind' type, unlikely to take the lead.

It needs another quarter or so.

Unless we get capital injection/donation from the rich Arabs. Funds from other countries particularly USA, I think that's unlikely in near term.

We just need to monitor the currency. That the 'wind' indicator.

My 2c.
wodenus
post Dec 22 2016, 08:31 PM

Tree Octopus
********
All Stars
14,990 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(puchongite @ Dec 22 2016, 08:27 PM)
Personal i think for KLSE to regain growth momentum, it needs foreign funds. Local funds are the 'follow the wind' type, unlikely to take the lead.

It needs another quarter or so.

Unless we get capital injection/donation from the rich Arabs. Funds from other countries particularly USA, I think that's unlikely in near term.

We just need to monitor the currency. That the 'wind' indicator.

My 2c.
*
Well, we did but people didn't like it so we gave it back. Everything got messed up after that. A lot of face was lost I guess, many people got pissed off tongue.gif


This post has been edited by wodenus: Dec 22 2016, 08:32 PM
asimov82
post Dec 22 2016, 09:54 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
92 posts

Joined: Apr 2011
QUOTE(Avangelice @ Dec 22 2016, 07:11 PM)
well many tiers of investments.

Tier 1 Money market
Tier 2 Fixed Income
Tier 3 Balance funds
Tier 4 Equity.

for me fixed income beats FD by a long run and when you are helping managing your wife's portfolio, it's better to have a FI and balance fund. you dare to set all equity for her meh. I don't want o. she already say if I lose her money I'll need to top up for her.

ngaiti.
*
in that case, you need to buy her only dividend/reit funds...
brainwash her that she can spend all the distribution received, nothing to do with capital gain/loss (for example reit still collect rent and pay u no matter how market judge the stock price).


MUM
post Dec 22 2016, 09:57 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,865 posts

Joined: Mar 2015

QUOTE(asimov82 @ Dec 22 2016, 09:54 PM)
in that case, you need to buy her only dividend/reit funds...
brainwash her that she can spend all the distribution received, nothing to do with capital gain/loss (for example reit still collect rent and pay u no matter how market judge the stock price).
*
when you said funds....do you mean Unit trust funds?
if yes,...then "spend all the distribution received, nothing to do with capital gain/loss"...looks like NOT correct-leh...as it will be loss.
shankar_dass93
post Dec 22 2016, 09:58 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,955 posts

Joined: Sep 2009


QUOTE(Avangelice @ Dec 22 2016, 07:11 PM)
well many tiers of investments.

Tier 1 Money market
Tier 2 Fixed Income
Tier 3 Balance funds
Tier 4 Equity.

for me fixed income beats FD by a long run and when you are helping managing your wife's portfolio, it's better to have a FI and balance fund. you dare to set all equity for her meh. I don't want o. she already say if I lose her money I'll need to top up for her.

ngaiti.
*
Tell her that investments are subjected to a great degree of uncertainty and you can only do your best to maximise her returns icon_rolleyes.gif


Thats what i told my aunty when she gave me a certain sum of money to help her make the right decisions
asimov82
post Dec 22 2016, 10:16 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
92 posts

Joined: Apr 2011
QUOTE(MUM @ Dec 22 2016, 09:57 PM)
when you said funds....do you mean Unit trust funds?
if yes,...then "spend all the distribution received, nothing to do with capital gain/loss"...looks like NOT correct-leh...as it will be loss.
*
the stock/reit the fund buy, suppose will generate enough dividend to pay as distribution,
which theoretically better than these "capital gain" fund.

in developed market, the average dividend yield is about 2%, which the number is at least double in our emerging region,
that should enough to cover the "distribution yield" we received annually.

MUM
post Dec 22 2016, 10:21 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,865 posts

Joined: Mar 2015

QUOTE(asimov82 @ Dec 22 2016, 10:16 PM)
the stock/reit the fund buy, suppose will generate enough dividend to pay as distribution,
which theoretically better than these "capital gain" fund.

in developed market, the average dividend yield is about 2%, which the number is at least double in our emerging region,
that should enough to cover the "distribution yield" we received annually.
*
for unit trust funds...the amount of distribution declared does NOTHING to improve the amount of money that are available to the investor, BEFORE and AFTER the distribution.

asimov82
post Dec 22 2016, 10:36 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
92 posts

Joined: Apr 2011
QUOTE(MUM @ Dec 22 2016, 10:21 PM)
for unit trust funds...the amount of distribution declared does NOTHING to improve the amount  of money that are available to the investor, BEFORE and AFTER the distribution.
*
hmm.. just to clarify that I am not saying "dividend/reit" fund have better distribution than "capital gain" fund,
what I am trying to say is that the source of money used for distribution for former could largely contributed from dividend received, not selling stock for cash, thus less affected by market fluctuation up/down.
anyway it is fund manager to decide on the distribution.

just my 2cents

This post has been edited by asimov82: Dec 22 2016, 10:40 PM
contestchris
post Dec 23 2016, 12:02 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,544 posts

Joined: Aug 2011

Can somebody explain to me whether or not there are fees to be paid for switching? Say, I switch from Affin Hwang Select Balanced Fund to Affin Hwang Select Opportunity Fund. Can I switch between the two every now and again with zero fees?

How long does the switching process takes? If say it takes 7 days, will the initial fund continue running for those 7 days, or will it be taken out/removed and then for a few days in between you don't have any active funds collecting gains/losses?
T231H
post Dec 23 2016, 12:31 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,143 posts

Joined: Jan 2015
QUOTE(contestchris @ Dec 23 2016, 12:02 AM)
Can somebody explain to me whether or not there are fees to be paid for switching? Say, I switch from Affin Hwang Select Balanced Fund to Affin Hwang Select Opportunity Fund. Can I switch between the two every now and again with zero fees?

How long does the switching process takes? If say it takes 7 days, will the initial fund continue running for those 7 days, or will it be taken out/removed and then for a few days in between you don't have any active funds collecting gains/losses?
*
to see affinhwang switching fees ...
https://www.fundsupermart.com.my/main/buyse...do?code=MYHWDBS

the whole process takes a few days to be reflected in your a/c
therefore your "switching every now and again" would have to be at least a min few days apart.

if you want to switch A to B
there is a transaction date.
example,
if transaction date is 25 Dec (for some funds it may not be on the same date)
the NAV of A on 25 Dec multiply by the unit available in A = amount A
on this 25 Dec, this amount A would be used to buy B on NAV on 25 Dec
thus A will then ceased to exist but B would starts to collect gains/losses.



contestchris
post Dec 23 2016, 12:43 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,544 posts

Joined: Aug 2011

QUOTE(T231H @ Dec 23 2016, 12:31 AM)
to see affinhwang switching fees ...
https://www.fundsupermart.com.my/main/buyse...do?code=MYHWDBS

the whole process takes a few days to be reflected in your a/c
therefore your "switching every now and again" would have to be at least a min few days apart.

if you want to switch A to B
there is a transaction date.
example,
if transaction date is 25 Dec (for some funds it may not be on the same date)
the NAV of A on 25 Dec multiply by the unit available in A = amount A
on this 25 Dec, this amount A would be used to buy B on NAV on 25 Dec
thus A will then ceased to exist but B would starts to collect gains/losses.
*
So it appears most funds from most companies have no switching fees...is that correct? I am reading the prospectus of certain funds, like those from CIMB, and they contain this extremely ambiguous line:

"Since switching is treated as a withdrawal from Class MYR and an investment into another
class or fund, you will be charged a Switching Fee equal to the difference (if any) between the
Application Fees of Class MYR and Application Fees of other class or fund. Switching Fee will
not be charged if the class or fund to be switched into has a lower Application Fee. In addition,
the Manager imposes a RM100 administrative fee for every switch made out of CIMB-Principal
Funds. The Manager also has the discretion to waive the Switching Fee and/or administrative
fees.
"

What does CIMB mean by that?

Also, if there is no switching fee on FSM for a certain fund, would it be the same on other unit trust management platforms such as M2U?

If there are switching fees involved, is it solely the responsibility of us to find out (by reading prospectus etc), or will the fees be stated on whichever platform you do the switching (FSM, M2U etc)?
T231H
post Dec 23 2016, 12:47 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,143 posts

Joined: Jan 2015
QUOTE(contestchris @ Dec 23 2016, 12:43 AM)
So it appears most funds from most companies have no switching fees...is that correct? I am reading the prospectus of certain funds, like those from CIMB, and they contain this extremely ambiguous line:

"Since switching is treated as a withdrawal from Class MYR and an investment into another
class or fund, you will be charged a Switching Fee equal to the difference (if any) between the
Application Fees of Class MYR and Application Fees of other class or fund. Switching Fee will
not be charged if the class or fund to be switched into has a lower Application Fee. In addition,
the Manager imposes a RM100 administrative fee for every switch made out of CIMB-Principal
Funds. The Manager also has the discretion to waive the Switching Fee and/or administrative
fees.
"

What does CIMB mean by that?

Also, if there is no switching fee on FSM for a certain fund, would it be the same on other unit trust management platforms such as M2U?

If there are switching fees involved, is it solely the responsibility of us to find out (by reading prospectus etc), or will the fees be stated on whichever platform you do the switching (FSM, M2U etc)?
*
click on the link provided earlier, select CIMB...then see if you buy from FSM...not sure if you buy from other resellers

This post has been edited by T231H: Dec 23 2016, 12:48 AM
contestchris
post Dec 23 2016, 01:17 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,544 posts

Joined: Aug 2011

Guys, if I put in RM1000, RM30 which is sales charge and so RM970 is the net initial investment.

How should I calculate my returns after one year? Do I minus 3% from the 1-year performance of the fund (for example, let's say it is 5%)? From second year onwards it is easy - my returns is the same as the returns quoted by FSM/Bloomberg etc. But I'm just wondering about first year returns since it has sales charge.

153 Pages « < 150 151 152 153 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0305sec    0.57    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 07:12 PM