If you don't calibrate your display like most of the TV buyers out there , you probably want to avoid the B9 .
LG is well aware their biggest competition of their OLED E and C series , comes from their very own B series .
Especially since it is cheaper ( in the oversea at least ) and has the same PQ performance and specs , as many have been saying since 2016 , why not ?
But things have started to change since 2018.
I have noticed the B series is on average , at least 100 cd/m2 (nits) dimmer below the C and E series . At first I thought it may be just panel variance .
Now in 2019 , reviews from multiple AV outlets confirms my suspicion .
LG is starting to intentionally dial back the features and specs of the B series to make the C and E more appealing.
At the same time , the B9 must have skipped an important step in the factory calibration settings as well .
The out of box color accuracy is just unusually bad, it is horrendous . This is no isolated incident , it was mentioned on several other professional reviews as well.
QUOTE
from 8KTV aus
For some reason, the LG B9 shipped with very bad pre-calibration settings. As a result, the white balance is way off, color accuracy is very off, and the color temperature is very warm. While this can be easily fixed with a calibration tool, not all buyers have the option to do so. It’s so strange for LG to have this when most TVs in 2019, including budget options, come with good pre-calibration out of the box.
from 4kdotcom
As for color accuracy, these are specs that we measure by the key specs of white balance delta E, color delta E and Gamma. In the B9, they are really damn crappy right out of the box but quickly become incredibly excellent after some moderate adjustment in the TV’s picture control menus.
from rtings
The accuracy of the B9 with its pre-calibration settings is poor. Most people will notice the inaccuracies in the pure whites, as the color temperature is warm with a yellowish tint. Enthusiasts, however, will also notice some inaccuracies in the colors. The gamma follows the target well, but some brighter scenes don't have the proper brightness.
This is strange because OLED TVs are usually pretty accurate . To the point the B series reminded me of those China's ABC brand TV you see below $2k.
Considering that the B9 has an inferior 3D Look Up Table (than C , E , W ), which means you will not be getting the same ultra accurate color accuracy you seen from the C , E , W series .
The post processing features like smooth gradation and noise reduction efficiency have also been reduced to half .
This is going to be noticeable in some of the badly compressed material , such as the infamous Games of thrones Episode 3 from season 8.
Essentially , everything that won the C and E series the " TV of the year " award from TV shoutouts are absent on the B9 series .
$9000 is still a very attractive price for a 65" OLED TV especially one that has HDMI 2.1 ports readily installed . It still retains most of the benefits from an OLED display but the drawback is becoming more significant each year .
On a buyer's perspective , if you really can't afford the C9 , you are better off with a 65" C8 which should not be much more pricey than the B9 by now.
This post has been edited by Convael: Oct 30 2019, 07:30 AM