QUOTE(keelim @ Aug 15 2021, 09:46 AM)
Thanks. What’s your take on onshore vs offshore immigration consultant?
Thanks. The point based system is clear. Each criteria is accredited by relevant agency. Wouldn’t this take a long time? I am an engineering graduate but have not spent a single day in engineering. Took up professional finance paper and that’s it. For 189, how do the authorities evaluate subjectivities as such? Any platform to make our cases?
Work experience points must be relevant to claimed qualification. So you will not get any work experience points applying as an engineer. If applying under finance, your finance qualification needs to be accredited by the relevant professional body.
Like I said, they have professional bodies for almost everything, so you will need any claimed professional qualification(s) assessed to be "equivalent" and "acceptable", especially non-Australian ones.
The 189 process starts with submitting an EOI, with your claimed points. How soon you get called for processing depends on how many points you have, and whether the claimed profession is a "pro-rata" or not. Pro-rata means too many applicants more than the allocated numbers, so the points needed to get called is higher.
This site used to give up to date information, but lately, not so many updates, due to Covid slowing down processing.
https://iscah.com/news-page/ Wait time to get invites can thus range from "immediate" (when points are high enough) to 2 years (validity of EOI). That's roughly 100/85 points for pro-rata, and 90/80 points for non-prorata. Below these points, EOIs usually will expire before invite. You can submit another EOI after, but realistically, if you don't at least 80 points, the chance is practically zero.
This post has been edited by limeuu: Aug 15 2021, 08:12 PM