QUOTE(dreamer101 @ Apr 20 2007, 08:12 AM)
Bond versus Equity -> Maybe. But, most of the bonds are issued by Government and GLC too. Single player dominated the bond too.
<<different categories of industries. Rules of diversify = not put everything in the same basket, m i right?>>
It does not work in Malaysia
A) KLSE is not a good representation of Malaysia economy since NOT all indutries are listed or listed in equal weight.
B) With a single large share holder (Government) in all industries, where is the diversification??
C) All you eggs is hold in one basket!!!
So, you are maybe right about bonds versus stocks. But, you are wrong in diversification over industries.
Dreamer
I see, thanks for the information. I'm still new in UT and investing either. What i'm trying to say in economic downturn, the diversification is work in UT assume government didn't make significant impact on KLSE. M i right?
QUOTE(cherroy @ Apr 20 2007, 09:07 AM)
Unit trust (equity) is as same as investing in stock market. They used your money to invest in stock market.
I think people have wrong perception it is safer than stock market because 80% of the retailers in KLSE like to buy those 'goreng' stock that's why it is different than unit trust since unit trust managers normally (it depends also) buy those blue chips and more based on fundamental compared to retailers who always like to buy those tips and rumour stock.
If you know how to invest and have sufficient fund to do it yourself, it is much better than unit trust since you don't need to pay 1.5% management fee annual and 5-6% entry charge. If you have discipline and knowledge about the stock market based on fundamental, you can easily also surpass their performance also. Discipline is also a key to success in stock market.
I think buy and sell stock incurred brokerage fees either. The reason most ppl invest in UT rather than stock market directly is because of diversification like i said assume government didn't make significant impact on it. For example, one is holding stock A,B,C with the money invested rm10k. Compare with the fund itself with holding various industries and numbers of stock across KLSE. This is the differences. Furthermore, I think if the management of the UT is working, when the market crashes, they can liquidate it faster than the other and keep most money in cash. But I dont really know what happened inside the UT mgmt, that's just what i think they'll do.
Any comment?
PS: UT investor, they have to take note of something with the brochure given by the agent. I think compare to overseas brochure, the overseas brochure return are normally show in annualised return which is different from just calculating
(SP-PP)*unit and find the return. If you annualised the return, you might find that the return from UT is actually very low compare to overseas.
The other thing to take note is that the return from the brochure given by the agent/UT, is NAV with NAV. Meaning it's the repurchase price Over a period of 5 years. But it didn't take the 5-6% service charges which incurred during you buy the trust.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dreamers: Personally, i think funds in SG is doing quite well. 1st. They're international trade market, the funds participate in international market and they have more experience in investing overseas compare to Malaysia's UT. M i right?