ooh i get it just swapped the better cooler as primary now ready for testing again, waterblock hell no way im spending more

just like a weeks ago, linus did a FreeSync vs G-Sync.
maybe it can help u choose.

works like a charm bro, now the temps are a lot better. never knew such solution

Glad you got my point.

During my SLI experience last time, the bottom card will be hotter.

If I run better cooling card at top, it will be 6x Celsius while the bottom card at 8x.

If I swap them, both at 7x, more sensible to run in long run.

thanks again bro and now most games are 60 fps constant, shadow of mordor buttery smooth

well to be honest.. i don't think is wise financially... as you already own GTX 980 Ti why sold it off at a lower price and spend to get new GPU is kinda waste bruv... just go green till HBM2 out unless you Crap Gold/Dollar!!

Note i am known to be AMD Graphic Fan.. +noob

has anyone here manage to do 15.7 windows 7/8.1 Vs windows 10 15.7 benchmark comparison?

I can do that tonight with 8.1 vs 10, but i don't have many games installed.

your xeon so powerful ur scores very good on 3dmark , my single r9 290 on fx 8350 scores cant even hit 8k mark

Only in synthetics benchmark bro, many games i played don't even utilize over 3 cores.
If you can try disable half of the modules if you board allow and overclock the hell out of the CPU.

The project cars wins 10 benchmark is outdated already.

since they are testing is b4 15.7,

b4 15.7 the win8 Amd driver does not have cpu overhead optimization, but the win 10 beta has some optimization already. So obvious we see win10 is faster on project cars back then.

Now I hope to see win 10 vs win 8 CPU overhead bench base on the new 15.7. To see win 10 really make a huge diff or not. If u got powerful cpu, u might wanna down clock a bit to see the diff.

This post has been edited by billytong: Jul 27 2015, 02:59 PM

max i can go stable is 4.4ghz that also prime95 will start show error after half hour, one of the cores sure kantoi 1, i up the voltage/reduce fsb still no difference, i also managed to go all the way up to 4.6ghz no BSOD whatsoever half hour same prime95 kantoi but 3dmark no issues never crash/bsod or whatsoever.

can i just ignore prime95 results? 3dmark does not utilize all cores ka bro?

try occt for stress test.. fx8350 should be easily achieved at 4.7ghz stable.

il give it a try BTW im still on air cooling currently on noctua NH-D15 isnt 4.7 a bit to high for air cooling

I guess Fiji really 'overclocked' to maximum for its current 'stock speed'.
No wonder AMD locks down the voltage to hide it.


http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/R9_..._X_Overvoltage/

Tried pCars, Win10 advantage is still there and quite significant.

R9-290x | 1080/1350 | Catalyst 15.7
Bathurst | 14:00 | Clear | 20 Cars | Settings
Win 8.1
Win 10
Btw other games is nothing like this, they either marginally slower or marginally faster.

>150w extra.

This post has been edited by Acid_RuleZz: Jul 27 2015, 10:44 PM

Can set at +96mV for 150Mhz extra on the Fury X

Besides, why he used an old game like BF3?

This post has been edited by terradrive: Jul 27 2015, 11:51 PM

Perhaps battlefield 3 is more optimized/stable/mature game than battlefield 4?

Or probably he wanna reduce cpu impact on gpu? Who know.......

Maybe battlefield 3 won't hit VRAM limit at UHD resolution than B.4?.....otherwise, more than 4GB = texture swapping time......

Why not use other games like the Witcher 3 etc?

Yeah, +96mv at 1200mhz looks great. Now what Fury X need is a proper driver.

It's TPU, they always use BF3 to measure overclocking performance.