Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
3 Pages  1 2 3 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 AMD Radeon™ Discussion V13, Radeon Software 16.5.3, God Speed

views
     
SUSTheHitman47
post Jun 25 2015, 02:39 PM

Nuke
******
Senior Member
1,053 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: In Your Mind



QUOTE(Unseen83 @ Jun 25 2015, 02:32 PM)
hmm.gif  feel underpower...  hm maybe i should stick to Crossfire R9 290X TriX/Vapor... it is silent AMD Fury X(should be call Fluffy X)

[attachmentid=4500874] [attachmentid=4500914]

sorry i'm noob in this.. later after breaking fast i try again..  icon_rolleyes.gif
*
Try on some games u have.
SUSTheHitman47
post Jun 25 2015, 08:28 PM

Nuke
******
Senior Member
1,053 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: In Your Mind



QUOTE(Desprado @ Jun 25 2015, 02:48 PM)
Linus Fury X was DOA that shows how much problem it will have and never heard that review sample DOA first time i have heard that.
*
linus accidently drop their fury x according to their vessel video.

So theres that.
SUSTheHitman47
post Jun 26 2015, 09:00 AM

Nuke
******
Senior Member
1,053 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: In Your Mind



Fury X possibly reviewed with incorrect drivers

QUOTE
"Just putting this out there. Here's a review that seems quite different from the other ones: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=e...iji-part3.shtml This one actually shows that Fury beats 980 ti in a lot of tests and even titan x in some tests. Of course in lower resolutions it seems that NVidia still wins a lot of times, but it's not as bad as it is with some other reviewers. Now here's a possible reason why. Driver version used in this review is 15.15-180612a-18565BE which the reviewer was sent by AMD on June 18th. The press driver on AMD's FTP server is 15.15-150611a-185358E. I think this is probably the reason of this inconsistency."

edit: you can download the "20th" driver here it should end with june20.exe
edit: guru3d with correct driver


for lyn fury x owner.. sweat.gif

This post has been edited by TheHitman47: Jun 26 2015, 09:00 AM
SUSTheHitman47
post Jun 26 2015, 05:34 PM

Nuke
******
Senior Member
1,053 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: In Your Mind



QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Jun 26 2015, 09:54 AM)
Think dude u need to look at the review properly.
There were a lot of inconsistency even between 980ti vs titan X

But basically fury x won where no aa or af was used.

Jaggy heaven i guess
*
not sure, but as the quote..980ti and titan x still dominating for lower reso.
oso, as gold said..aa is not 4k thing.
SUSTheHitman47
post Jun 26 2015, 05:36 PM

Nuke
******
Senior Member
1,053 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: In Your Mind



QUOTE(yhsiau @ Jun 26 2015, 05:02 PM)
The Fury product line up will be :

Fury X (Water cooled, Air cooled)

Fury (air cooled)

Fury nano (short card for ITX case), I am waiting for this card.

Fury X2!!!
*
iinm

fury = air cooled
fury x = water cooled

there wont be any air cooled fury x, wasnt it hmm.gif

SUSTheHitman47
post Jun 26 2015, 08:08 PM

Nuke
******
Senior Member
1,053 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: In Your Mind



QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Jun 26 2015, 05:52 PM)
U guys really need to game at 4k.

Any form of af needs aa.

Ure using pixel pitch as an excuse.  Aka the inability of ure eyes to distinguish jaggies so to say there is no need. Which is false.
Jaggies still there.
Resolution doesnt fix jaggies.
If tonight free will post some screenshots.

You guys really need to update ureself more. This topic already been covered in ocn. You wont find anyone there anymore spouting no aa required for 4k.
*
as if.. rolleyes.gif

"want to play some games?".
"how about we play game of finding the jaggies in 4k".

said no one ever. tongue.gif
SUSTheHitman47
post Jun 26 2015, 08:16 PM

Nuke
******
Senior Member
1,053 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: In Your Mind



QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Jun 26 2015, 08:12 PM)
Exactly. That said person doesnt know what he is talking about

tongue.gif tongue.gif

Lol.
*
that said person who actually playing games...instead of finding jaggies

laugh.gif

topkek
SUSTheHitman47
post Jun 26 2015, 08:36 PM

Nuke
******
Senior Member
1,053 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: In Your Mind



QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Jun 26 2015, 08:29 PM)
That said person playing jaggy game. Mesti too much motion blur/dof till cannot see.

tongue.gif tongue.gif tongue.gif
*
who the hell still using motion blur, going rclxub.gif while playing games..
get it..playing. not finding jaggies pixel .. tongue.gif

u must be going crazy if play minecraft.."nooo my games is soo jaggy!!" tongue.gif
"cant finish this batman...too jaggy." doh.gif
SUSTheHitman47
post Jun 26 2015, 09:56 PM

Nuke
******
Senior Member
1,053 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: In Your Mind



QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Jun 26 2015, 08:55 PM)
apparently you dude. Even if not ure monitor is doing it with the response rate and bad overdrive i guess.
batman almost done lol.. no jaggies here at 4k.

AA is needed u guys just dont want to accept the fact.
cause the alternative ppl would be comfortable with the amount of vram they have.

anyway end of this banter as it reminiscence the same beginning of whether ssd needed for gaming and 8gb needed for gaming etc..
now everybody is using it and forgot their earlier remarks.
*
most of your point is based on assumption.

apparently i use motion blur.
apparently something wrong with my response rate
apparently im having bad overdrive
apparently i cant play without aa, 4k must need aa. doh.gif
apparently i comfortable with amout of vram i prolly have.

aa is needed or necessary in 4k?.

doesnt know what to make about your last para..another going around for some unrelated issue just like last time for unknown reason

most of your word is a fairy dust to me because its from your pov and to you your pov is 100% correct. rolleyes.gif

SUSTheHitman47
post Jun 27 2015, 01:20 PM

Nuke
******
Senior Member
1,053 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: In Your Mind



QUOTE(Unseen83 @ Jun 27 2015, 11:11 AM)


Edit: naah i change.. too expensive.. sad.gif by way what case is that ? and did you see  AMD Fury X in 3dmark Hall of Fame ? ? i can't find it.. http://www.3dmark.com/hall-of-fame-2/fire+...rsion+1.1/4+gpu
*
its phanteks enthoo primo red version.
SUSTheHitman47
post Jun 27 2015, 04:58 PM

Nuke
******
Senior Member
1,053 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: In Your Mind



QUOTE(ngkhanmein @ Jun 27 2015, 03:31 PM)


got coil whine??  hmm.gif pump make the noise level high?? hmm.gif jayz too bias on nvidia.
*
never seen jayz being biased about review.

i think it just hes get bad unit?.
SUSTheHitman47
post Jun 27 2015, 05:21 PM

Nuke
******
Senior Member
1,053 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: In Your Mind



QUOTE(marfccy @ Jun 27 2015, 05:03 PM)
he himself mentioned hes biased to Nvidia already in the first place
*
he said he use nvidia as his preference personal use, and it didnt not affect with his review.

SUSTheHitman47
post Jun 28 2015, 01:49 PM

Nuke
******
Senior Member
1,053 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: In Your Mind



QUOTE(area61 @ Jun 28 2015, 01:16 PM)
This looks to be the cheapest R9 390X

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
powercolor do have cheapest price, i remember last time i almost bought powercolor 290 before idealtech bringing in the vapor-x.
SUSTheHitman47
post Jul 4 2015, 03:00 PM

Nuke
******
Senior Member
1,053 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: In Your Mind



on the side note, Acid_RuleZz can u update the 1st post, already been more than few days. biggrin.gif
SUSTheHitman47
post Jul 7 2015, 09:00 PM

Nuke
******
Senior Member
1,053 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: In Your Mind



QUOTE(terradrive @ Jul 7 2015, 08:18 PM)


» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


GTX970 times up, only advantage it had is the lower power consumption.
*
this denied jayz bias/lean towards nvidia like someone said before.

is the pricing same to compare to malaysia?.
im not up to date with msia prices.

This post has been edited by TheHitman47: Jul 7 2015, 09:01 PM
SUSTheHitman47
post Jul 8 2015, 11:40 PM

Nuke
******
Senior Member
1,053 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: In Your Mind



QUOTE(Human10 @ Jul 8 2015, 12:01 PM)
From previous pictures, Nano appeared to be even shorter than FuryX, so probably have different PCB design.
*
it should be shorter, if not..theres no reason to called it nano.
SUSTheHitman47
post Jul 12 2015, 05:40 AM

Nuke
******
Senior Member
1,053 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: In Your Mind



QUOTE(Unseen83 @ Jul 12 2015, 01:01 AM)
eh check out TechView.. selling Sapphire R9 Fury RM2,899.. say price not include GST...  eh look like have to annoy my Fwen working there again, KPDNKP have to say OVER price item do fall under their radar... Even so is not under control price item, but when item/product sold OVEr recommended price.. gov want to know how is their annual Tax to Gov..  laugh.gif
*
everybody should have friends at KPDNKP..seems fun biggrin.gif

QUOTE(Minecrafter @ Jul 12 2015, 01:07 AM)
Probably typo. laugh.gif Another misleading thing is they added "GDDR5" instead of "HBM".
user posted image
*
the facts that they put GDDR5 is more cringing that the overpriced hardware.. tongue.gif
SUSTheHitman47
post Jul 14 2015, 05:55 AM

Nuke
******
Senior Member
1,053 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: In Your Mind



QUOTE(chocobo7779 @ Jul 13 2015, 05:28 PM)
Well, CFX/SLI scalings of Fury X/980Ti/Titan X are here:

http://wccftech.com/amd-radeon-r9-fury-qua...uhd-benchmarks/
*
talking about CFX, You Can Pair an R9 300 Series GPU with an R9 200 in CrossFire

source
SUSTheHitman47
post Jul 26 2015, 12:01 AM

Nuke
******
Senior Member
1,053 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: In Your Mind



QUOTE(shikimori @ Jul 24 2015, 09:47 PM)
anyone here have actually used freesync ? Is it worth jumping from nvidia just to use it

just got myself a freesync monitor LEL
*
just like a weeks ago, linus did a FreeSync vs G-Sync.
maybe it can help u choose.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

SUSTheHitman47
post Jul 30 2015, 03:14 PM

Nuke
******
Senior Member
1,053 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: In Your Mind



QUOTE(billytong @ Jul 28 2015, 06:52 AM)
Acid_RuleZz

hey, thanks for taking time to do benchmark. Appreciated it thumbup.gif notworthy.gif

btw what about futuremark draw call benchmark? Or any draw call benchmark on (win 8.1 + 15.7 vs win 10 + 15.7)

btw What CPU spec? what clock speed? if ur cpu too fast it might make other benchmark marginally diff only.

The goal here is to find whether is it worth to upgrade win10 immediately for AMD CPU optimization or wait 6 months later.  tongue.gif  (because new OS always got launch day bugs, I wanna avoid this mess)
*
and then, theres this.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


3 Pages  1 2 3 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0227sec    0.43    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 25th November 2025 - 10:24 PM