AMD Radeon™ Discussion V13, Radeon Software 16.5.3, God Speed
|
|
 Jun 25 2015, 10:08 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
6,056 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Suldanessellar   
|
If that's the case then there's a chance that the Nano is cheaper than 390x?
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Jul 7 2015, 05:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
6,056 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Suldanessellar
|
An article at Anandtech expects the Nano to be retailed higher than Fury X
 http://www.anandtech.com/show/9390/the-amd...fury-x-review/9 |
|
|
Jul 7 2015, 06:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
6,056 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Suldanessellar
|
QUOTE(Unseen83 @ Jul 7 2015, 06:09 PM) i say AMD R9 NAno be same price or tad a bit lower.. Haha, dude, read the article la 1)why higher price? no AIO Wc.. so extra cost producing or involve, no paying 3rd party AIO e.g. CoolerMaster 2) still base on Fiji same Stream just Lower Clock/Mem HBM, TDP lower so OC must be lock or worst than (limited) Fury X.. 3) base this .. http://www.anandtech.com/show/9390/the-amd...fury-x-review/9 does it say about price R9 Nano be Higher ?   |
|
|
Jul 7 2015, 06:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
6,056 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Suldanessellar
|
QUOTE(Unseen83 @ Jul 7 2015, 06:54 PM) i wait for r9 nano out with the reasons being having no competition for that form factor.Ah wells. I thought the nano would be a slightly more affordable Fiji. |
|
|
Aug 24 2015, 10:23 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
6,056 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Suldanessellar
|
The last week of August already, still no news bout Nano
 |
|
|
Aug 26 2015, 03:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member
6,056 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Suldanessellar
|
AMD's own Nano benchmark
http://www.pcworld.com/article/2974664/com...-fury-nano.html Waiting for actual ones from reviewers. |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 27 2015, 10:38 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member
6,056 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Suldanessellar
|
$650 for R9 Nano. That's close to RM3k
Ah wells. http://wccftech.com/amd-radeon-r9-nano-unl...faster-gtx-980/ |
|
|
Aug 27 2015, 10:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member
6,056 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Suldanessellar
|
QUOTE(Human10 @ Aug 27 2015, 10:42 AM) Trololol, FuryX pricing minus AIO (and 2 power phase). Yeah so the previous article about Nano having a premium price since it's the only awesome mini-ITX card, is right after all Might as well get FuryX and undervolt own self? |
|
|
Aug 27 2015, 10:51 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Senior Member
6,056 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Suldanessellar
|
QUOTE(Human10 @ Aug 27 2015, 10:45 AM) It's not bout premium, but priced the same as its biggest brother with full specs and premium of AIO, trololol. Nano has a premium price because it doesn't really have a competitor in the mini-ITX section of cards.I rather softmod FuryX myself than getting the Nano... I guess I'll just wait for a proper DX12 card  |
|
|
Aug 27 2015, 11:41 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Senior Member
6,056 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Suldanessellar
|
QUOTE(JohnLai @ Aug 27 2015, 11:38 AM) For gamer (majority with large chassis) , why settle for underperforming Nano when they can opts for Fury X AIO or GTX980TI with similar price? I really don't think AMD made Nano for people who have casings that a GTX980Ti can fit. |
|
|
Aug 27 2015, 03:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
Senior Member
6,056 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Suldanessellar
|
Yeap I think many people were mistakenly thinking that Nano will be a lower range of the new HBM cards, like how the 270s are to the 280s.
|
|
|
Nov 26 2015, 07:11 AM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
Senior Member
6,056 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Suldanessellar
|
QUOTE(S4PH @ Nov 25 2015, 10:20 AM) yeah wanted a card which is power efficient/cool and able to get high details on 1080p only How much did you get it for? I'm looking for a card, dunno if I should get 970 or 390, or just save some bucks and get 380x |
|
|
Nov 26 2015, 06:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
|
Senior Member
6,056 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Suldanessellar
|
QUOTE(S4PH @ Nov 26 2015, 05:50 PM) 380x How much did you pay for it? |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 27 2015, 10:23 AM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
|
Senior Member
6,056 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Suldanessellar
|
QUOTE(chocobo7779 @ Nov 26 2015, 10:50 PM) Not sure if it'll affect the prices over here |
|
|
May 25 2016, 11:59 AM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
|
Senior Member
6,056 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Suldanessellar
|
QUOTE(Acid_RuleZz @ May 23 2016, 11:35 PM) "Leaked" 3DMark11 score for Polaris 10 from VC.com Hmm, it better be retailing at under USD300 like they claimed. Comment pl0x. |
|
|
May 26 2016, 02:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
|
Senior Member
6,056 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Suldanessellar
|
QUOTE(Acid_RuleZz @ May 25 2016, 02:38 PM) If it's over $300 GTX1070 will overshadow this card which on par with Titan-X@$380. Yeah. If it's more than USD300, might as well just add a little bit more for a 1070. |
|
|
Jun 1 2016, 07:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
|
Senior Member
6,056 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Suldanessellar
|
Good news so far for the 480.
But I'm actually very disappointed that there's no mentioning of 480x |
|
|
Jun 1 2016, 07:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
|
Senior Member
6,056 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Suldanessellar
|
QUOTE(vyonxhin @ Jun 1 2016, 07:36 PM) Prolly this is their new naming scheme where RX480 is the 480X where R480 is the non X version. regardless at this pricetag they are going to crush the secondary gpu market. I hope you're right but I think the 199 one is the slower one and there's a 299 one which I assumed it's the 480x, as shown in the leaked scored shown in videocardz. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0517sec
 0.99
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 25th November 2025 - 08:11 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.