oh how win 10 mr.. lab mouse ? stable ? ? possible to up load Mantle draw call on dx12 on here ?

dont blow 2 soon

hold ya horses

Pretty stable with some rare hiccups on the UI.

With my processor and 15.200.40 driver, i get
920k+ on DX11 ST
890k+ on DX11 MT
11M+ on Mantle
13M+ on DX12

But after upgraded to current build 10163, i only get 3.9k physic score in Firestrike.

Look at the FPS number, 10% hit on Titan X when running at the same image quality settings as Fury X.

All benchmarks partaining to Nvidia's cards are questionable now.

"Optimization"

What setting is this? In NCP or ingame?
Is it only happen in BF4? What about 980Ti?

That was the settings in NCP. No idea about 980 Ti yet. People who own 970, 980, & 980 Ti should run these two settings in some games and compare the screenshots.

Oh by the way Fury X is meant to be crossfired Unseen83















http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/7226/amd...ire/index5.html

Things always seem to come arnd in full circle

Ncp quality vs high quality is texture filtering

High quality overides the default optimization for game engines. The optimization is not a performance enchancement. Its just complying with the game engine texture filtering optimization support.

Quality is what the game engine defaults are.
Google unreal tournament 3870 vs 8800gt

What ure asking is akin to reencode a 16 bit lossless audio to a 24bit and compare the hardware utilization on decode.

Next somdbody gonna do a driver force optimization n say thats what it suppose to look like. Thats what high quality is.

Also as per last time this issue came up. They should fix an fps on both side n crank everything up.

Let me take a guess. All this is bf4. Dice crappy engine.

This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jul 4 2015, 11:43 AM

There is thing called professional benchmark and review and if their was a case like this than nvidia hater sites would have highlighted it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clgSqNHjGp0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vnr9FoTAyCA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYqNXlDV8dE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_e8xdOrShEU

If you can find any lower IQ in GTX 980 Ti in this benchmarks vs Fury X.

It is simply a time to move on and accept the defeat rather making an stupid excuse.

It is not a stupid excuse, one reviewer confirmed he ran NCP at default settings for benchmark.



http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2438166&page=2

One owner of two 295X2 cards (quad Hawaii CF) and 2 980Ti told his experiences:




http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2437903&page=3

This post has been edited by terradrive: Jul 4 2015, 12:29 PM

eh when i buy Fury x i can't find my discount coupon for sec gpu and i don't think i can afford sec fury x.. i took out 5year car loan pay rm2K monthly.. so this fury x i own will probably be with me long time...(till my next year bonus) but.. wow Crossfire scalar really are impressive.. again AIO wc i need to do minor mod in my case to fit sec Fury x.

nice.. so there improvement performance.. but on draw call...

Remove GTA V from the list because it is a known bug and only 350.12 do not have that AF bug.It was highlighted by PCper that GTA V AF drops after 350.12 driver.

Did you look at those videos?

They all are running at NVP default settings.That is why i told there a thing called professional Review and if their was any case than it would have been highlighted by techsopt, Gamegpu.RU, PC world and e.t.c

This post has been edited by Desprado: Jul 4 2015, 12:35 PM

Still have Arma 3, BF4, Project Cars etc

I looked at the videos, the videos are horribly compressed to the point that the edges of the car in GTA V is not clearly defined. Are you serious to compare image quality on such horrible source?

This post has been edited by terradrive: Jul 4 2015, 12:37 PM

No project car is the same.Look at the video carefully.Debate is only on BF4.

There are both taken from different scene.
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Project-CARS...k-Test-1158026/

I will tell u again their is a thing called professional benchmarking which is not for everyone.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWPrfqDbSWA

This post has been edited by Desprado: Jul 4 2015, 12:43 PM

*Professional*


10% FPS drop when ran on the quality designed by game developers

Comparing worse image quality setting in NCP (default setting) vs better image quality settings in CCC is benchmarking, lol. I call it cheating.

I have shown you man professional video which no IQ difference.
It is fact that lack of maturity are the majority of AMD fanboys and that is the reason why AMD share in gutter.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UvsYE6-ErMI

This post has been edited by Desprado: Jul 4 2015, 12:54 PM

Professional vid.. Load up 4k 20mins shadowplay 60fps max quality about 16gb.
But then again amd doesnt have a video capturing hardware encode capability .. Afaik

Comparing on youtube..

desperado
Dont bother bro. Same topic every 5 years.

I sum up the whole story here and if people cannot understand than god help them

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nc_pXTkRefg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOaNGwEl0vU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOaNGwEl0vU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0i_RmuSYP7w

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYIueIbQ6dM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PniRZaA3zMg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrSkRC7QvIM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9walJtvG60

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9v7DKVW4M4

This post has been edited by Desprado: Jul 4 2015, 01:05 PM

Default quality settings


NCP set to max quality settings


Screenshot, not video, From Greg @ OCUK

Desprado, your so called *professional reviewers* failed to catch on the GTX 970's 3.5GB fiasco, who got the conspiracy ball rolling and proven to be the truth? USERS

This post has been edited by terradrive: Jul 4 2015, 01:08 PM