http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/...scue-rohingyas/M’sia has a legal obligation to rescue Rohingyas
May 18, 2015
The Responsibility to Protect law dictates that no country should return refugees to places where they are persecuted or subjected to danger
COMMENT
By Charles Santiago
Over the last few days, we have tried to appeal to Prime Minister Najib Razak’s humane side and his conscience, to rescue the thousands of Rohingya refugees who are adrift at sea.
This approach seems to have failed.
Therefore, we are now forced to look at the international laws that Malaysia has flouted by pushing the refugee boats back.
There is a legal obligation, under the international maritime law, to rescue people in distress at sea if the rescuing country does not put itself in imminent danger by doing so.
Malaysia has however craftily translated distress to mean sinking boats and drowning people, before it jumps in to offer aid.
At least ten refugees have died and news reports say they were forced to drink their urine to keep alive. It cannot get any worse than this, with the exception of dead bodies reaching our shores.
We have made our way into the United Nations Security Council. This is good news but it also means that there are provisions and rules that we need to adhere to.
Malaysia’s UN Security Council role, compels it to uphold the Responsibility to Protect (RtoP) through Resolution 1674 (Para 139). Asean can no longer hang on to the belief of non-interference, not when there is a clear and present danger to humanity.
According to these rules, it is mandatory that we accept all Rohingya refugees and not just the ones who are facing imminent death at sea, as this is mandatory under the international law of non-refoulement.
This law dictates that no country should return refugees to places where they are persecuted or subjected to danger.
The minority Rohingya continue to face state-sponsored violence in Myanmar. They are also subjected to various discriminatory laws, which restrict their movement, ability to work or own assets.
If this is not enough, they were recently banned from having more than two children.
We have seen heartbreaking pictures of women and children, cramped in boats and left to drift aimlessly at sea.
Malaysia has a duty and obligation to rescue these women and children as it has ratified the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) and also the Child Rights Convention (CRC).
Our very own law, the Anti-Trafficking in Persons makes it compulsory that as soon as someone is identified as the victim of trafficking, Malaysian authorities must present them before a magistrate within 14 days and secure an interim protection order. Then the trafficked victim must be placed in a government shelter.
It does not take a genius to figure out that all the people on the boats were victims of trafficking, abandoned at sea by the traffickers.
It is sad that we need to leverage upon existing legislation to compel a government to act with conscience.
But just as the Rohingya Muslims are left with no choice but to flee, we are left with no choice but to get Malaysia to act by the book now, to save the lives of thousands of Rohingya refugees.
Charles Santiago is the Member of Parliament of Klang
With a firm belief in freedom of expression and without prejudice, FMT tries its best to share reliable content from third parties. Such articles are strictly the writer’s personal opinion. FMT does not necessarily endorse the views or opinions given by any third party content provider.