Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Why Hannah Yeoh so pro-Rohingya?, Has family relation with Rohingya?

views
     
ProfessorR
post May 17 2015, 02:11 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
26 posts

Joined: May 2015



QUOTE(.:zaxiao:. @ May 16 2015, 04:37 PM)
It's not pro-Rohingya.
It's pro-humanitarian, altruism, it's called being a good samaritan.

Giving shelter to the needy, the hopeless, the despised, the unwanted.

Why is it so hard to understand?

Giving them basic necessities to live on doesn't equate to integrating them into our society.
It doesn't mean giving them IC or voting powers.
It doesn't mean accepting them as Malaysian.
It doesn't mean giving them fucking jobs you people don't want to do anyway.

But lending a hand to fellow human beings.

Lending them a hand doesn't have to come from our own pockets either, god forbid our taxpayers money is used to help ppl kan?
There are many avenues to raise funds, from ASEAN, from UN, from charities.

And as the Chair of Asean, we can compel and put pressure on the fucking Burmese government to treat their ppl with due care and take responsibility of their own shit.

Najib said that Asean needs to make a decision as a whole, but for godsake, if we leave them to float out at sea while they hang around the board room drinking Nescafe Dolce Gusto, there will be no more need to make a decision, because people are fucking dying out there already.
*
QUOTE(skeleton202 @ May 16 2015, 05:26 PM)
It is 2-way-lose game for gov.. dia amik rohinya kena kondem,,, dia tolak rohhinya pon kena kondem
*
I'm actually very disappointed but not surprised with the bulk of you tards being so shitty towards the lives of these uneducated rohingyas. I don't like them, you don't like them but if want to be a world heavyweight country in the future, Malaysia should be able to make critical decisions.

Malaysia has 2 choices:

1. Play the waiting game and do nothing till the problem disappear by itself

2. Collaborate with other countries to provide basic food and water then send them back to Burma. That's where they disembarked. What happens is none of the Malaysian government's business but the collaboration should discuss with Burma for a long term solution.

Right now our government is on option 1.

Our government has a good reason not to let them in. Not enough money.
To all those criticizing the government, today is the day you learnt that money is more important than lives.
ProfessorR
post May 17 2015, 12:45 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
26 posts

Joined: May 2015



QUOTE(Szzz @ May 17 2015, 02:48 AM)
Don't you know international laws? Do that and you have the entire backlash of UN. Ban Ki Moon has stated that we have to “ensure that the obligation of rescue at sea is upheld and the prohibition of refoulement is maintained". If you think shooing the boats away is a human right crime, sending them back to Myanmar is definitely worse.
*
We give good and food then send them back. Who said shoot them back?


ProfessorR
post May 17 2015, 01:08 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
26 posts

Joined: May 2015



QUOTE(X3r0 @ May 17 2015, 12:55 PM)
Send them back? You think they are gifts that can be sent here and there after they are done up and wrapped up nicely?

What if Myanmar doesn't want to accept them and decides to sink them upon entering their waters/aerospace/land? Then what?

We shelter them until all of them dies? As UNHCR doesn't support having refugees being sent back to places where they are being persecuted.

Don't forget that currently all of them are being persecuted and not recognized meaning Myanmar don't even want them at all! Sent them back means all of them will face death sentence anyway.

If they know by being in the sea and plea then ASEAN countries will still host and clothe them, i'm sure 2nd, 3rd wave will come.  It still beats being persecuted and nothing to lose, all to gain!

I don't support accepting them, just sink them in the international waters already.

My tax money should be used to benefit Malaysians, not host refugees, we already have too many refugees to accommodate.
*
Bodo ke?

You wanna solve the problem or not?
ProfessorR
post May 17 2015, 04:41 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
26 posts

Joined: May 2015



QUOTE(X3r0 @ May 17 2015, 02:27 PM)
What problem? Not Malaysia's problem for sure.

Give them what is necessary to survive and tow them back to Myanmar.

What happens next is between Myanmar and their problem.
*
The problem is Malaysian coast guard didn't block them from coming in Malaysia waters.

Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0188sec    0.39    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 05:08 PM