QUOTE(sniper69 @ Jan 23 2007, 01:57 AM)
Are you sure its okay that the RAMs are running much slower than the FSB of CPU? I mean, performance wise it won't be affected?*edit*
I found an article somewhere:
QUOTE
To make it easier, convert the 5:4 ratio to a 100:80 ratio. So for every 100MHz your FSB runs at, your RAM will only run at 80MHz. Basically, this means that your RAM will only run at 80% of your FSB speed. So with your 250MHz target FSB, running in a 5:4 FSB:RAM ratio, your RAM will be running at 200MHz, which is 80% of 250MHz. This is perfect, since your RAM is rated for 200MHz.
This solution, however, isn't ideal. Running the FSB and RAM with a ratio causes gaps in between the time that the FSB can communicate with the RAM. This causes slowdowns that wouldn't be there if the RAM and the FSB were running at the same speed. If you want the most speed out of your system, using an FSB:RAM ratio wouldn't be the best solution.
This solution, however, isn't ideal. Running the FSB and RAM with a ratio causes gaps in between the time that the FSB can communicate with the RAM. This causes slowdowns that wouldn't be there if the RAM and the FSB were running at the same speed. If you want the most speed out of your system, using an FSB:RAM ratio wouldn't be the best solution.
So means having RAM speed way slower than FSB will affect the performance is it? How bad will it be?
This post has been edited by J-Slade: Jan 23 2007, 12:53 PM
Jan 23 2007, 11:43 AM

Quote
0.0265sec
0.75
6 queries
GZIP Disabled