Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
171 Pages « < 15 16 17 18 19 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Canon EOS Family, DSLR, EOS - V58, The White Paladins' Territory!

views
     
goldfries
post Sep 17 2014, 01:32 AM

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




QUOTE(mingyuyu @ Sep 16 2014, 07:31 PM)
yeah what a pity, Canon has good IQ EF-S but not good BUILD EF-S.  laugh.gif
i won't say they're not good build.

those EF-S 17-55 and 15-85 are solid. Even L lens, not all of them are weather sealed.

SUSthelightside
post Sep 17 2014, 01:43 AM

samsengfag 0.o
******
Senior Member
1,824 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
From: troll la la
http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/09/high-is...eos-7d-mark-ii/
user posted image

Looks good but need to see raw files...
SUSthelightside
post Sep 17 2014, 02:17 AM

samsengfag 0.o
******
Senior Member
1,824 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
From: troll la la
Some canon japan offical 7dii vid but in japanese...





Here from Canon america pretty boring laugh.gif


This post has been edited by thelightside: Sep 17 2014, 02:27 AM
mingyuyu
post Sep 17 2014, 11:43 AM

B A N N E D
Group Icon
Elite
3,249 posts

Joined: Oct 2011


There'a a 200mm f1,8 on sale for rm19k if anyone's interested tongue.gif

https://www.facebook.com/KLDslr/photos/a.37...3719008/?type=1
prody
post Sep 17 2014, 01:02 PM

Dance while the record spins
******
Senior Member
1,548 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


So when will 7d mark ii arrive here?
Need to upgrade from my 60d AF system.
Michaelbyz23
post Sep 18 2014, 10:52 AM

Sarawak Maju Makmur
*******
Senior Member
4,558 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
From: Selangor / Sarawak / New York



QUOTE(prody @ Sep 17 2014, 01:02 PM)
So when will 7d mark ii arrive here?
Need to upgrade from my 60d AF system.
*
why not go straight for 5d mark iii? or 6d? biggrin.gif
tboxmy
post Sep 18 2014, 11:52 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
478 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


QUOTE(Michaelbyz23 @ Sep 18 2014, 10:52 AM)
why not go straight for 5d mark iii? or 6d? biggrin.gif
*
6D is higher end than 7D?
mingyuyu
post Sep 18 2014, 11:55 AM

B A N N E D
Group Icon
Elite
3,249 posts

Joined: Oct 2011


QUOTE(tboxmy @ Sep 18 2014, 11:52 AM)
6D is higher end than 7D?
*
kinda hard to say tho. it has FF sensor, some other little features like Wifi. but has a not so good AF system and burst compared to 7D II.
Michaelbyz23
post Sep 18 2014, 11:57 AM

Sarawak Maju Makmur
*******
Senior Member
4,558 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
From: Selangor / Sarawak / New York



QUOTE(tboxmy @ Sep 18 2014, 11:52 AM)
6D is higher end than 7D?
*
sensor-wise, yes. Because it's full-frame sensor. But technology wise, no. 7d mark ii is a whole new camera with 65 af focus points. Plus 10fps on the 7d mark ii.
Since he already owns the 60D, i don't see any good reason to upgrade to 7d mark ii, spending thousands just to have a better AF. In my opinion, if you are not shooting olympics, F1 or any high end sports frequently, then don't need the 7d mark ii AF system. Maybe upgrade to FF, it opens up another whole new level of photography world for you. Different perspective, different image quality, different bokeh quality. If you already fully utilizing the APSC sensor, maybe you can jump to FF, but need enough budget as well. icon_rolleyes.gif
tboxmy
post Sep 18 2014, 11:57 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
478 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


I saw a site selling Tamron lens for the 300mm. Why some are at RM2,985 (28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di VC PZD Lens (Model A010) for Canon EOS ) and some RM490 (70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro Zoom Telephoto Autofocus Lens)?

Such a big difference if I just need to shoot zoomed distance objects.
tboxmy
post Sep 18 2014, 11:59 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
478 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


QUOTE(Michaelbyz23 @ Sep 18 2014, 11:57 AM)
sensor-wise, yes. Because it's full-frame sensor. But technology wise, no. 7d mark ii is a whole new camera with 65 af focus points. Plus 10fps on the 7d mark ii.
Since he already owns the 60D, i don't see any good reason to upgrade to 7d mark ii, spending thousands just to have a better AF. In my opinion, if you are not shooting olympics, F1 or any high end sports frequently, then don't need the 7d mark ii AF system. Maybe upgrade to FF, it opens up another whole new level of photography world for you. Different perspective, different image quality, different bokeh quality. If you already fully utilizing the APSC sensor, maybe you can jump to FF, but need enough budget as well.  icon_rolleyes.gif
*
That saves some $$.
llsphinxll
post Sep 18 2014, 12:13 PM

debt that all men pay..
*******
Senior Member
2,197 posts

Joined: Nov 2008



guys,
my 60d masuk air. the main turning thing not working properly. it is set to M but shows AP. also, the on/off button doesnt work. its constantly on, the only way to off it is to take out the battery.

any chance for repairing it? if yes, where? thanks sifus. notworthy.gif
prody
post Sep 18 2014, 12:25 PM

Dance while the record spins
******
Senior Member
1,548 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(Michaelbyz23 @ Sep 18 2014, 10:52 AM)
why not go straight for 5d mark iii? or 6d? biggrin.gif
*
FF is too expensive, mark iii is about 11k for the body alone.

I also recently bought the 17-55mm f/2.8 IS. smile.gif

The much improved auto focus will come in very handy with my wife's shooting of action shots at parties and my shooting of my kids.
mingyuyu
post Sep 18 2014, 01:07 PM

B A N N E D
Group Icon
Elite
3,249 posts

Joined: Oct 2011


QUOTE(prody @ Sep 18 2014, 12:25 PM)
FF is too expensive, mark iii is about 11k for the body alone.

I also recently bought the 17-55mm f/2.8 IS.  smile.gif

The much improved auto focus will come in very handy with my wife's shooting of action shots at parties and my shooting of my kids.
*
why not 70D? it's like RM2k cheaper than the 7D mark II. The AF from the 70D is taken from 7D I.
prody
post Sep 18 2014, 01:42 PM

Dance while the record spins
******
Senior Member
1,548 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(mingyuyu @ Sep 18 2014, 01:07 PM)
why not 70D? it's like RM2k cheaper than the 7D mark II. The AF from the 70D is taken from 7D I.
*
I would not upgrade to a 70d, the change from a 60d to a 70d is not so significant unless you use your camera mainly for video.


lanusb
post Sep 18 2014, 02:06 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
807 posts

Joined: May 2005


will they have articulating lcd for FF in near future?
mingyuyu
post Sep 18 2014, 03:03 PM

B A N N E D
Group Icon
Elite
3,249 posts

Joined: Oct 2011


QUOTE(prody @ Sep 18 2014, 01:42 PM)
I would not upgrade to a 70d, the change from a 60d to a 70d is not so significant unless you use your camera mainly for video.
*
which part do you feel lacking in the 70D? mind you the 7D AF system is very capable even after so many years as what you will get in the 70D. Don't mind the name, the 70D is stil a solid upgrade from the 60D imo.

QUOTE(lanusb @ Sep 18 2014, 02:06 PM)
will they have articulating lcd for FF in near future?
*
perhaps the 6D II?
Rice_Owl84
post Sep 18 2014, 03:15 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
603 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
QUOTE(tboxmy @ Sep 18 2014, 11:57 AM)
I saw a site selling Tamron lens for the 300mm. Why some are at RM2,985 (28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di VC PZD Lens (Model A010) for Canon EOS ) and some RM490 (70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro Zoom Telephoto Autofocus Lens)?

Such a big difference if I just need to shoot zoomed distance objects.
*
You paying for optical quality, image stabilization and focus motor quality. Sometimes paying for the super zoom range, which optically not great but its for people seeking convenience for a one lens does it all.

The reviews for the Tamron 70-300 Di Macro cheapo lens are not good. For rm490 Budget zoom the canon 55-250mm IS ii is better. Optically good with decent image stabilization but not so good autofocus.

But the Tamron 70-300mm VC USD (price around rm1300) has ton of good reviews and says it has very good optics for its value. Good optics and good image stabilization and decent motor focus. Many reviews recommend this lens as best value telephoto.

It all depends on your budget and what quality you want. You wiling to spend more for IQ than look at the 70-200mm by both Canon L and Tamron.
prody
post Sep 18 2014, 03:34 PM

Dance while the record spins
******
Senior Member
1,548 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(mingyuyu @ Sep 18 2014, 03:03 PM)
which part do you feel lacking in the 70D? mind you the 7D AF system is very capable even after so many years as what you will get in the 70D. Don't mind the name, the 70D is stil a solid upgrade from the 60D imo.
*
The 70d is a fine camera, but I already have a 60d. The autofocus system on the 70d is of course better then that of the 60d, but it is not enough for me to change the camera.

The change in autofocus system from 60d to 7d mark ii is huge though.

Michaelbyz23
post Sep 18 2014, 04:22 PM

Sarawak Maju Makmur
*******
Senior Member
4,558 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
From: Selangor / Sarawak / New York



if i were you, i will not even think of upgrading. since you just purchased the 17-50, just stick with it. I have shot tons of sports photos with canon 500d, one of the most basic AF system, and published too. 60d is far far better in terms of AF. plus, shooting fast moving subject is not entirely dependent on your camera as well, mostly on skills and experience, and also on your lens quality. trust me on this, u are just thinking of upgrading because of the hype!
so i really don't see the point of upgrading to 70d, 7d, or even 7d mark ii. save some money up first if budget is your problem. i really recommend your next camera to be a Full frame sensor cam if u really want to upgrade. smile.gif just my two cents.



171 Pages « < 15 16 17 18 19 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.1093sec    0.98    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 10:25 PM