QUOTE(duckevo @ Apr 2 2017, 07:30 AM)
This proves my "hypothesis" that there is no such thing as "branded diamonds".Thanks for sharing bro!
Advice Wanted [WTA] Proposal Ring & Wedding Bands, Please advice me!! Need Help!!
|
|
Apr 2 2017, 11:13 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,439 posts Joined: Jan 2011 From: Ipoh, Perak |
QUOTE(duckevo @ Apr 2 2017, 07:30 AM) This proves my "hypothesis" that there is no such thing as "branded diamonds".Thanks for sharing bro! |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 2 2017, 11:50 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
15 posts Joined: Aug 2008 |
GIA: 5176318230
0.37c E color VS1 with setting with small side diamonds RM5.2k Worth it? |
|
|
Apr 2 2017, 01:09 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
76 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
QUOTE(naijnaij @ Apr 2 2017, 11:50 AM) This diamond is slightly on the shallow side, with the wider table and slightly short crown height.34 degree crown angle is an acceptable angle, but I would prefer something between 34.3 to 34.9 in order to get more fire. But this is just my personal preference, getting a 34.x degree crown angle is already something not that easy in the market. So I will consider this diamond one of the better ones. I based this on AGA/NAJA cut class grader: http://datlas.com/AGA_NAJA_Cut_Class_grader/index.php Tab Percent: 1B Crown Angle: 1A Crown Height: 1B Pavilion Depth: 1A Girdle: 1A Depth: 1A Polish: 1A Symmetry: 1A TotalGrade: 1B HCA is 1.4 Light Return: Excellent Fire: Excellent Scintillation: Very Good Spread or diameter for weight: Very Good Total Visual Performance 1.4 - Excellent within TIC range Enchanted Cut Score is 97.2% Overall, I would say that this diamond is considered better than most you can find. This diamond has been there since May 5, 2014. I would feel strange that it is still there, considering the proportions and price. My guess is that: 1. It is already preset in a ring setting and has been in the shelf since some time ago and now they are doing promotion to let go of this diamond ring. Correct me if I am wrong though. 2. The diamond doesn't look great when you look at it. Hence, it is not sold. Remember that good proportions does not translate to good performance because we do not know about the cut quality based on proportions alone. However, I have to say the price seems fair enough, considering you are getting side stones on a 18k white gold (Is 18k right?) |
|
|
Apr 2 2017, 01:42 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
15 posts Joined: Aug 2008 |
QUOTE(kambingkoh @ Apr 2 2017, 01:09 PM) This diamond is slightly on the shallow side, with the wider table and slightly short crown height. Thx for the insight. Appreciate it.34 degree crown angle is an acceptable angle, but I would prefer something between 34.3 to 34.9 in order to get more fire. But this is just my personal preference, getting a 34.x degree crown angle is already something not that easy in the market. So I will consider this diamond one of the better ones. I based this on AGA/NAJA cut class grader: http://datlas.com/AGA_NAJA_Cut_Class_grader/index.php Tab Percent: 1B Crown Angle: 1A Crown Height: 1B Pavilion Depth: 1A Girdle: 1A Depth: 1A Polish: 1A Symmetry: 1A TotalGrade: 1B HCA is 1.4 Light Return: Excellent Fire: Excellent Scintillation: Very Good Spread or diameter for weight: Very Good Total Visual Performance 1.4 - Excellent within TIC range Enchanted Cut Score is 97.2% Overall, I would say that this diamond is considered better than most you can find. This diamond has been there since May 5, 2014. I would feel strange that it is still there, considering the proportions and price. My guess is that: 1. It is already preset in a ring setting and has been in the shelf since some time ago and now they are doing promotion to let go of this diamond ring. Correct me if I am wrong though. 2. The diamond doesn't look great when you look at it. Hence, it is not sold. Remember that good proportions does not translate to good performance because we do not know about the cut quality based on proportions alone. However, I have to say the price seems fair enough, considering you are getting side stones on a 18k white gold (Is 18k right?) Yes bro..The diamond already set..As for the price..I guess it's the discount I'm getting from a friend's referral. It's from one of those old school Chinaman jewellery shops in an old shopping complex in KL. I'm comparing with this actually: GIA:5176569863 0.34c F SI1 Similar setting in 18k rose gold rm4.2k To be honest..I can't really tell the difference between these 2 diamonds in terms of brightness..fire etc. It kinda looks the same to me.. the only major noticeable difference is the size..haha |
|
|
Apr 2 2017, 03:55 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,439 posts Joined: Jan 2011 From: Ipoh, Perak |
QUOTE(naijnaij @ Apr 2 2017, 01:42 PM) Thx for the insight. Appreciate it. Of course you will notice the size difference cuz one is 60.5% depth (shallow cut) and the other is 62.4%. One good thing about shallow cut is that it will appear larger face-up. So if you don't mind sacrificing a bit of fire here and a bit of brilliance there, then go for shallow cut.Yes bro..The diamond already set..As for the price..I guess it's the discount I'm getting from a friend's referral. It's from one of those old school Chinaman jewellery shops in an old shopping complex in KL. I'm comparing with this actually: GIA:5176569863 0.34c F SI1 Similar setting in 18k rose gold rm4.2k To be honest..I can't really tell the difference between these 2 diamonds in terms of brightness..fire etc. It kinda looks the same to me.. the only major noticeable difference is the size..haha |
|
|
Apr 2 2017, 05:41 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
76 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
QUOTE(naijnaij @ Apr 2 2017, 01:42 PM) Thx for the insight. Appreciate it. Well, I won't consider the 0.34c F SI1 because:Yes bro..The diamond already set..As for the price..I guess it's the discount I'm getting from a friend's referral. It's from one of those old school Chinaman jewellery shops in an old shopping complex in KL. I'm comparing with this actually: GIA:5176569863 0.34c F SI1 Similar setting in 18k rose gold rm4.2k To be honest..I can't really tell the difference between these 2 diamonds in terms of brightness..fire etc. It kinda looks the same to me.. the only major noticeable difference is the size..haha 1. 62.4% is cut too deep, as indicated by bb100. 2. 36 degree crown angle is too steep. It will be a good idea to keep things between 34 - 35 degrees. 3. SI1 with feather and twinning wisp? Without knowing the location of the inclusion is a no-no to me. The benefit of the earlier 0.37 is definitely the size, as indicated by bb100 as well. However, if you don't mind a slightly smaller diamond, you may refer to this diamond that I have chosen from WhiteFlash just now to compare the price: http://myengagementringexperience.blogspot...whiteflash.html This post has been edited by kambingkoh: Apr 2 2017, 05:46 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 2 2017, 05:48 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
76 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
QUOTE(duckevo @ Apr 2 2017, 07:30 AM) Hahaha, saw it on FB this morning. |
|
|
Apr 2 2017, 06:37 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,439 posts Joined: Jan 2011 From: Ipoh, Perak |
QUOTE(kambingkoh @ Apr 2 2017, 05:41 PM) Well, I won't consider the 0.34c F SI1 because: Bro, don't give me all the credits bro. I only back up what you said je.1. 62.4% is cut too deep, as indicated by bb100. 2. 36 degree crown angle is too steep. It will be a good idea to keep things between 34 - 35 degrees. 3. SI1 with feather and twinning wisp? Without knowing the location of the inclusion is a no-no to me. The benefit of the earlier 0.37 is definitely the size, as indicated by bb100 as well. However, if you don't mind a slightly smaller diamond, you may refer to this diamond that I have chosen from WhiteFlash just now to compare the price: http://myengagementringexperience.blogspot...whiteflash.html |
|
|
Apr 2 2017, 06:42 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
76 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
|
|
|
Apr 3 2017, 07:07 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
12 posts Joined: Mar 2017 |
My stone from WF dah sampai. XD. Looks really good. The ring box is awesome. Btw, how can we check the inscription? The viewer provided tak cukup power pun.
|
|
|
Apr 4 2017, 12:31 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
76 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
QUOTE(cakoi898 @ Apr 3 2017, 07:07 PM) My stone from WF dah sampai. XD. Looks really good. The ring box is awesome. Btw, how can we check the inscription? The viewer provided tak cukup power pun. The H&A viewer is meant to look at the hearts from the bottom of the diamond and arrows from the top of the diamond. In order to view the inscription, you will need a loupe and look at the girdle of the diamond from the side. You can request the jeweler that will help you set the diamond to show it to you. Depends on individual, some may take some time and effort to really see the inscription on the girdle. |
|
|
Apr 4 2017, 06:37 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
12 posts Joined: Mar 2017 |
QUOTE(kambingkoh @ Apr 4 2017, 12:31 AM) The H&A viewer is meant to look at the hearts from the bottom of the diamond and arrows from the top of the diamond. In order to view the inscription, you will need a loupe and look at the girdle of the diamond from the side. You can request the jeweler that will help you set the diamond to show it to you. Depends on individual, some may take some time and effort to really see the inscription on the girdle. Thanks Koh. Memory jewellery says they have x10 magnifying glass that can view the inscription. x10 powerful enuff? or can only do it with trained eye. Still deciding between both Eumayco and memory jewellery as both of them offer same price for ring setting. Anyone has experience with both of them here?This post has been edited by cakoi898: Apr 4 2017, 06:38 AM |
|
|
Apr 4 2017, 09:49 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
76 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
QUOTE(cakoi898 @ Apr 4 2017, 06:37 AM) Thanks Koh. Memory jewellery says they have x10 magnifying glass that can view the inscription. x10 powerful enuff? or can only do it with trained eye. Still deciding between both Eumayco and memory jewellery as both of them offer same price for ring setting. Anyone has experience with both of them here? According to what I have just read, 10x maybe not so clear, try 20x: https://www.serendipitydiamonds.com/blog/ho...n-your-diamond/Anyway, why don't you pay a visit to both and see how things go? How much they are charging you for ring setting anyway? This post has been edited by kambingkoh: Apr 4 2017, 09:51 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 4 2017, 11:26 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
12 posts Joined: Mar 2017 |
QUOTE(kambingkoh @ Apr 4 2017, 09:49 AM) According to what I have just read, 10x maybe not so clear, try 20x: https://www.serendipitydiamonds.com/blog/ho...n-your-diamond/ One in Sentul, one in Empire damansara. Both so far. Have to plan a weekend to visit there.Anyway, why don't you pay a visit to both and see how things go? How much they are charging you for ring setting anyway? custom made = 1.3K from Eumayco and 1.5k from memory jewellery (After bargain bargain got 1.3k) This post has been edited by cakoi898: Apr 4 2017, 11:27 AM |
|
|
Apr 4 2017, 01:54 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
76 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
|
|
|
Apr 4 2017, 02:47 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
12 posts Joined: Mar 2017 |
classic solitaire with twist on top design
|
|
|
Apr 4 2017, 11:36 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#637
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
76 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
|
|
|
Apr 5 2017, 12:40 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
12 posts Joined: Mar 2017 |
|
|
|
Apr 11 2017, 12:31 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
76 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
|
|
|
Apr 12 2017, 03:00 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
12 posts Joined: Mar 2017 |
|
| Change to: | 0.0211sec
0.41
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 07:38 PM |