Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Military Thread V11, #Condolences9MMRO :(
|
Strike
|
Mar 18 2014, 12:04 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(aztechx @ Mar 17 2014, 10:18 PM) And i thought id never see posts like this anymore in kopitiam with everyone seeming to agree with everything the white people say.. Im particularly wondering why Are the western media so unusually interested my guess, south china sea issue.. last time thousands for oil and pipeline this time also the same??
|
|
|
|
|
|
HuorEarfalas
|
Mar 18 2014, 12:26 PM
|
|
QUOTE(yinchet @ Mar 18 2014, 02:46 AM) Again you are pointing finger at military without knowing what actually have happen. As I have already said it could be lots of factors going there. Until the full report is out it will hard to determine where is the faults. Sop? Dca? Military? Yes thing must be rectified like the sop, intergration dca atc to the military network and so on.Precisely for this, I am blaming the military (or the government if the military had earlier proposed such integration but was never approved) for jeapordising national securityit still raised lots of question not just for malaysia but the entire aviation industry. How much control do we have on the commercial aviation?
|
|
|
|
|
|
HuorEarfalas
|
Mar 18 2014, 12:34 PM
|
|
QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ Mar 18 2014, 03:02 AM) Why put much pressure on the military, is not in their jurisdiction to monitor commercial flight, much less notice if anything wrong with a particular flight that is not informed by the ATC Then it is high time that government and military approves the budget to implement the necessary integration so such thing does not happen in the near future. They better not sit idly by while the enemy of this nation are gathering valuable information of our military flaws and plan their next attack. National security should be put above all else, even if they have to stretch the national budget.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSyinchet
|
Mar 18 2014, 12:46 PM
|
If you wish for peace, prepare for war
|
I find Hawkermaya comments at ma blogs winrar. QUOTE As lame as a scenario could be but shall we consider this?A kid on his way to school. Somewhere along the way he changed clothes and diverted elsewhere. Well the parents obviously thought that their child is at school not until the teacher calls home asking the parents where their child is. Culprit 1 – ParentsNot monitoring their child movement. Culprit 2 – TeachersNot/late informing the parents/police/whoever of the child not coming to school. Culprit 3 – PoliceFor not ensuring that the child goes straight to school. Culprit 4 – The childEither he acted on his own or he got a friend waiting at a junction or worst, was kidnapped on his way to school
Anybody can judge and blame any of the culprits. With regards to our situation right now, CULPRIT 3 is public enemy no. 1. It’s easy for us, a bystander at the roadside to point fingers demanding explanation. A kid walking on the street wouldn’t raise any suspicion to the police on his patrolling round. Likewise, an anonymous airliner flying in the airways will not trigger the red button not unless it is observed to be diverting going straight to klcc or the kl tower. Being the guy in the air defence radar room, he obviously was not in the know of the flight plan of these aircrafts simply because those are not the thing that’s required off him to know. An air defence radar as the name imply monitor threats coming from the outside or any pop-up unidentified tracks. Primary radar sees hundreds of blips on real time as long as an element produce a significant radar return. Air defence and air traffic control is two different business altogether.
An unidentified blip originating from a known track flying steadily on an airways in a non-suspicious manner wouldn’t warrant the red button being triggered. Yes, could have been better should the radar operator picked up his phone and call the ATC to reconfirm, as in the school kid scenario where the police on patrol could have stopped and asked the kid of his intention. But on a street where there are hundreds of kids walking, how on earth could he know which kid is which not unless he saw one running around wielding parang or one pedaling his bicycle ramming straight into their patrol car! Even so, an abducted kid subdued and dragged in a Myvi would surely pass most prying eyes.
Having said all that, certainly an improvement to the SOP’s of national ATC is required. If i recall correctly even the acting transportation minister did suggested earlier of integrating RMAF officers into the DCA. If only it was done sooner.
Not that i’m defending the authorities when they themselves have a lot of other accountability issues. But lets have some respect to those working hard in the effort rather than engage in the endless blaming game. Some information is just beyond our paygrade so lets focus on things that we know rather than speculative assumption.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSyinchet
|
Mar 18 2014, 12:50 PM
|
If you wish for peace, prepare for war
|
QUOTE(HuorEarfalas @ Mar 18 2014, 12:26 PM) Blamming the government instead of the military. Military can only proposed to the government but its upto the government to approve or not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
atreyuangel
|
Mar 18 2014, 01:10 PM
|
|
QUOTE(maryjane9996 @ Mar 18 2014, 07:41 AM) anybody from Malaysian Navy here ? wanna ask few question. ltzbut shoot anyway!
|
|
|
|
|
|
atreyuangel
|
Mar 18 2014, 01:47 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Learjet35
|
Mar 18 2014, 01:48 PM
|
|
QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Mar 18 2014, 01:10 PM) thanks bro. i just wondering,is our navy ship have capabilities for sea-skimming threat ? to shoot down low missile/drone/aircraft ? low as in angel 50ft.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSyinchet
|
Mar 18 2014, 01:55 PM
|
If you wish for peace, prepare for war
|
QUOTE(maryjane9996 @ Mar 18 2014, 01:48 PM) thanks bro. i just wondering,is our navy ship have capabilities for sea-skimming threat ? to shoot down low missile/drone/aircraft ? low as in angel 50ft. Drone and aircraft yes. missile I doubt ds30m ciws capable of shooting down highspeed russian asm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Learjet35
|
Mar 18 2014, 01:59 PM
|
|
QUOTE(yinchet @ Mar 18 2014, 01:55 PM) Drone and aircraft yes. missile I doubt ds30m ciws capable of shooting down highspeed russian asm. highspeed in how many knot ? 250knot ? cwis using 30mm bullet ? thanks bro.
|
|
|
|
|
|
atreyuangel
|
Mar 18 2014, 02:01 PM
|
|
QUOTE(maryjane9996 @ Mar 18 2014, 01:48 PM) thanks bro. i just wondering,is our navy ship have capabilities for sea-skimming threat ? to shoot down low missile/drone/aircraft ? low as in angel 50ft. it called CIWS capability the radar will detect it and gun missile are deployed to shoot it down it is all automated and guided by the radar
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSyinchet
|
Mar 18 2014, 02:08 PM
|
If you wish for peace, prepare for war
|
QUOTE(maryjane9996 @ Mar 18 2014, 01:59 PM) highspeed in how many knot ? 250knot ? cwis using 30mm bullet ? thanks bro. Yes it use 30mm bullet. Missile like klub-s, brahmos goes super sonic like mach 2 speed. these kind of missile extremely deadly if we dun have good ciws. ds30m could still able to shoot down harpoon though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSyinchet
|
Mar 18 2014, 02:12 PM
|
If you wish for peace, prepare for war
|
QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Mar 18 2014, 02:01 PM) it called CIWS capability the radar will detect it and gun missile are deployed to shoot it down it is all automated and guided by the radar Sedih kalau gowind kita tak ambik millennium ciws dan searam.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Learjet35
|
Mar 18 2014, 02:13 PM
|
|
QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Mar 18 2014, 02:01 PM) it called CIWS capability the radar will detect it and gun missile are deployed to shoot it down it is all automated and guided by the radar thank u bro. QUOTE(yinchet @ Mar 18 2014, 02:08 PM) Yes it use 30mm bullet. Missile like klub-s, brahmos goes super sonic like mach 2 speed. these kind of missile extremely deadly if we dun have good ciws. ds30m could still able to shoot down harpoon though. thats super fast. was thinking to provide low level height keeping target for the navy. any of u involving in coming AAG in butterworth ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
kinabalu
|
Mar 18 2014, 02:29 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MrSyakir
|
Mar 18 2014, 02:39 PM
|
Getting Started

|
On MH370, I have a strong feeling that the reason we were unsure whether MH370 was the plane seen on military radar at 2:15AM was because the plane crossed Thailand at the edge of our radar scope. This would explain why PTU said the bleep were intermittent in nature instead of a consistent track, the latter which we would obtain if the plane flew across Kota Bharu, Penang and to Pulau Perak as reported in the media. There are also couple factors that strengthened my view on this 1) media report that Thailand may not operate primary radar durning the night 2) Hat Yai has an international airport that serves flights to Phuket which may provide the commercial air route MH370 to slip into. Hat Yai itself is a commercial route coming from Cambodia. 3) Why would the person handling MH370 choose to fly in and out of Malaysia at sharp turns? It is easier to choose a more direct route The lesson learned is threats are gonna be more and more sophisticated (eg the diversion that plane might have crashed that duped the ATCs), so we have to learn from this and prepare ourselves. This post has been edited by MrSyakir: Mar 18 2014, 02:41 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
HangPC2
|
Mar 18 2014, 02:59 PM
|
|
QUOTE(yinchet @ Mar 18 2014, 02:12 PM) Sedih kalau gowind kita tak ambik millennium ciws dan searam. nanti Otai military kata ini bukan '' Destroyer ''
|
|
|
|
|
|
zimhibikie
|
Mar 18 2014, 05:13 PM
|
|
QUOTE(HangPC2 @ Mar 18 2014, 02:59 PM) nanti Otai military kata ini bukan '' Destroyer '' tak pun, "CIWS is serious business yo.."
|
|
|
|
|