Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
126 Pages « < 48 49 50 51 52 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Samsung Galaxy Note 3 - Official v6, 3rd gen of the best phablet ever!!

views
     
SUSdestEX
post Oct 1 2013, 07:15 PM

oink oink
*******
Senior Member
3,432 posts

Joined: Apr 2010



QUOTE(shockk @ Oct 1 2013, 07:10 PM)
There's a microchip at the SView cover (the part where you cover the back of the phone, replacing your original Note III back cover) which has two metal connectors. These two same connectors make contact with another two perfectly aligned contacts on the Note III internally, the area next to the battery. If they have this, not sure if they still need NFC since the phone itself can already read the SView cover's data through these physical connectors.

I'll try to post up a photo later so that everyone knows clearly what I'm referring to.
*
so it actually replaces the whole backcover oh? no wonder i see the camera area why is it protruding slightly and i thought the s-view cover must be really thin!
shockk
post Oct 1 2013, 07:15 PM

[ T A R G E T - L 0 C K E D ]
Group Icon
VIP
11,883 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(881118 @ Oct 1 2013, 07:07 PM)
Somehow my guess is the Sview cover got a 5 gold pins that connect to the back of your device (5 gold slots)
Previously I saw someone posted his cover (non wireless charging type) but with 5 gold pins. He thought those are for wireless charging.
Normal backplate don't have any pin at all.

Maybe 3 pins are designed for wireless charging while 2 pins are for sview cover authentication.
But anyway, this is kinda lame.
*
Yes, this is correct.

5 contacts - for the Wireless SView covers with wireless-charging ability.
2 contacts - for the standard Sview covers just for transmitting authentication data to the Note III to confirm that the SView cover is indeed original.

This post has been edited by shockk: Oct 1 2013, 07:16 PM
SUSdestEX
post Oct 1 2013, 07:16 PM

oink oink
*******
Senior Member
3,432 posts

Joined: Apr 2010



QUOTE(shockk @ Oct 1 2013, 07:15 PM)
Yes, this is correct.

5 contacts - for the Wireless SView covers with wireless-charging ability.
2 contacts - for the standard Sview covers just for transmitting authentication data to the Note III to confirm that the SView cover is indeed original.
*
eh? so now got 2 different version of s-view covers ah? rclxub.gif

then the RM189 one is which type?
TSjoytest
post Oct 1 2013, 07:17 PM

Vox populi vox dei? Quot homines,tot sententiae
********
All Stars
13,188 posts

Joined: Dec 2011
From: 127.0.0.1


QUOTE(shockk @ Oct 1 2013, 07:15 PM)
Yes, this is correct.

5 contacts - for the Wireless SView covers with wireless-charging ability.
2 contacts - for the standard Sview covers just for transmitting authentication data to the Note III to confirm that the SView cover is indeed original.
*
So did you get the one with 2 pins or 5 pins?
shockk
post Oct 1 2013, 07:17 PM

[ T A R G E T - L 0 C K E D ]
Group Icon
VIP
11,883 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(destEX @ Oct 1 2013, 07:16 PM)
eh? so now got 2 different version of s-view covers ah?  rclxub.gif

then the RM189 one is which type?
*
RM189 is just the standard one without wireless charging capability. The wireless version is not out yet.
shockk
post Oct 1 2013, 07:17 PM

[ T A R G E T - L 0 C K E D ]
Group Icon
VIP
11,883 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(joytest @ Oct 1 2013, 07:17 PM)
So did you get the one with 2 pins or 5 pins?
*
Mine has 2 pins only.

TSjoytest
post Oct 1 2013, 07:18 PM

Vox populi vox dei? Quot homines,tot sententiae
********
All Stars
13,188 posts

Joined: Dec 2011
From: 127.0.0.1


QUOTE(shockk @ Oct 1 2013, 07:17 PM)
RM189 is just the standard one without wireless charging capability. The wireless version is not out yet.
*
3 pins for wireless charging ..... 1 must be for voltage detection and adjustment....

It will be interesting to see how that works out. If it can provide GCC readings of 600mA or more, then it's worth getting.
SUSgogo2
post Oct 1 2013, 07:18 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(shockk @ Oct 1 2013, 07:15 PM)
Yes, this is correct.

5 contacts - for the Wireless SView covers with wireless-charging ability.
2 contacts - for the standard Sview covers just for transmitting authentication data to the Note III to confirm that the SView cover is indeed original.
*
I'm shocked that Samsung now fighting case piracy rclxub.gif
881118
post Oct 1 2013, 07:20 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
912 posts

Joined: Dec 2005


QUOTE(joytest @ Oct 1 2013, 07:12 PM)
Copper laaa....

Pins and Contacts, not slots tongue.gif

IF it comes with Wireless charging, then 189 is a good price. The receiving coil is already around RM50 from China manufacturers.
*
well I meant gold color pins..

for cover that comes with those pins and a coil (you can see some circular coils), then it has wireless charging

some covers come with those pins BUT no wireless coil, means no wireless charging support (don't understand why it needs those pins anyway)
that is why I suspect those pins are for the authentic SView cover authentication with the device itself

Edit: It was answered above by shockk

This post has been edited by 881118: Oct 1 2013, 07:21 PM
jason111785
post Oct 1 2013, 07:21 PM

To Eat or Not To Eat
******
Senior Member
1,214 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: KaY El (KL)



QUOTE(shockk @ Oct 1 2013, 07:25 PM)
Hey everyone and TS joytest

Wanna share my experience and some info with the original SView cover for the Note III.

I tested my white Note III with a black SView cover and the auto lock/unlock works including the SView feature but ONLY limited to when you are receiving calls. Everything else does NOT work unfortunately - like when u close the cover, the display on the SView window is blank.

Now after changing to a white SView cover instead, every SView function works perfectly.

So if u have a black or white Note III, u should get the same coloured SView the same as your Note III. As the other SView cover colours are not out yet besides black and white, I'm hoping that Samsung fixes this issue in a newer firmware.

Happy shopping for your SView cover ! biggrin.gif
*
I'm a black N3 users... and on white s-view cover. Everything works.

user posted image

user posted image
SUSgogo2
post Oct 1 2013, 07:22 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(jason111785 @ Oct 1 2013, 07:21 PM)
I'm a black N3 users... and on white s-view cover. Everything works.

user posted image

user posted image
*
probably shockk gotten fake S-View cover and the seller try to save his ass by saying its color coded. laugh.gif
881118
post Oct 1 2013, 07:24 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
912 posts

Joined: Dec 2005


user posted image

So far I am not impressed with the battery life
With normal usage, need to charge every 12 hours
With average low usage, need to charge every 24 hours (include sleeping time 10 hours not using the phone)
Andrewtst
post Oct 1 2013, 07:24 PM

Forgiveness is Happiness
*********
All Stars
29,764 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
From: Johor, Malaysia.


QUOTE(shockk @ Oct 1 2013, 06:25 PM)
Hey everyone and TS joytest

Wanna share my experience and some info with the original SView cover for the Note III.

I tested my white Note III with a black SView cover and the auto lock/unlock works including the SView feature but ONLY limited to when you are receiving calls. Everything else does NOT work unfortunately - like when u close the cover, the display on the SView window is blank.

Now after changing to a white SView cover instead, every SView function works perfectly.

So if u have a black or white Note III, u should get the same coloured SView the same as your Note III. As the other SView cover colours are not out yet besides black and white, I'm hoping that Samsung fixes this issue in a newer firmware.

Happy shopping for your SView cover ! biggrin.gif
*
Color won't affected la, probably the previous one is defective.
SUSdestEX
post Oct 1 2013, 07:24 PM

oink oink
*******
Senior Member
3,432 posts

Joined: Apr 2010



QUOTE(gogo2 @ Oct 1 2013, 07:22 PM)
probably shockk gotten fake S-View cover and the seller try to save his ass by saying its color coded.  laugh.gif
*
owned! laugh.gif laugh.gif
shockk
post Oct 1 2013, 07:25 PM

[ T A R G E T - L 0 C K E D ]
Group Icon
VIP
11,883 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(joytest @ Oct 1 2013, 07:18 PM)
3 pins for wireless charging ..... 1 must be for voltage detection and adjustment....

It will be interesting to see how that works out. If it can provide GCC readings of 600mA or more, then it's worth getting.
*
Yes, IIANM it should be Qi standard.

QUOTE(gogo2 @ Oct 1 2013, 07:18 PM)
I'm shocked that Samsung now fighting case piracy  rclxub.gif
*
Yes, indeed very weird. Unless they became very greedy?

QUOTE(jason111785 @ Oct 1 2013, 07:21 PM)
I'm a black N3 users... and on white s-view cover. Everything works.

user posted image

user posted image
*
Interesting. Perhaps only the fault lies in black SView cover on white Note III. Need another person with black SView cover to test on their white Note III. biggrin.gif
TSjoytest
post Oct 1 2013, 07:25 PM

Vox populi vox dei? Quot homines,tot sententiae
********
All Stars
13,188 posts

Joined: Dec 2011
From: 127.0.0.1


QUOTE(881118 @ Oct 1 2013, 07:20 PM)
well I meant gold color pins..

for cover that comes with those pins and a coil (you can see some circular coils), then it has wireless charging

some covers come with those pins BUT no wireless coil, means no wireless charging support (don't understand why it needs those pins anyway)
that is why I suspect those pins are for the authentic SView cover authentication with the device itself

Edit: It was answered above by shockk
*
I have bought wireless charging coils for my Note 2 and wife's S3. It's a bit thick, about 1.5mm, but the normal back cover can still be snapped shut albeit with a very slight bulge.

With regards to covers with built in coils, I don't think Samsung produced a lot for the Note 2 or S3. There were some reviews about the charging backcovers that was it.

Most other devices that support wireless charging have non-removable covers (Nokia, LG)
shockk
post Oct 1 2013, 07:27 PM

[ T A R G E T - L 0 C K E D ]
Group Icon
VIP
11,883 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Andrewtst @ Oct 1 2013, 07:24 PM)
Color won't affected la, probably the previous one is defective.
*
Yes, most likely so if someone else here did not have the issue apparently. Or there was a batch of defective ones. Funny that they tested the black SView on another black Note III and it works at the shop, but not on my white Note III. The irony!

Cause the SView does work when receiving calls, but only turns blank when doing other things. biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by shockk: Oct 1 2013, 07:28 PM
Andrewtst
post Oct 1 2013, 07:28 PM

Forgiveness is Happiness
*********
All Stars
29,764 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
From: Johor, Malaysia.


QUOTE(shockk @ Oct 1 2013, 07:25 PM)
Yes, IIANM it should be Qi standard.
Yes, indeed very weird. Unless they became very greedy?
Interesting. Perhaps only the fault lies in black SView cover on white Note III. Need another person with black SView cover to test on their white Note III. biggrin.gif
*
The Samsung shop you went just not sincere, they ignoring the faulty cover they give you and said crap. Impossible color affecting. Don't think any manufacture that stupid do such silly product, if this is real, then all others fancy color cannot use already as no phone is those color.

Above user also proof it. smile.gif

This post has been edited by Andrewtst: Oct 1 2013, 07:28 PM
881118
post Oct 1 2013, 07:28 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
912 posts

Joined: Dec 2005


QUOTE(joytest @ Oct 1 2013, 07:25 PM)
I have bought wireless charging coils for my Note 2 and wife's S3. It's a bit thick, about 1.5mm, but the normal back cover can still be snapped shut albeit with a very slight bulge.

With regards to covers with built in coils, I don't think Samsung produced a lot for the Note 2 or S3. There were some reviews about the charging backcovers that was it.

Most other devices that support wireless charging have non-removable covers (Nokia, LG)
*
hmm.. my fren LG Optimus PRO korean version got free FLIP Cover with built-in wireless charging. (got gold pins and coil)
his original blackplate also got gold pins but NO coil. (don't know why it need the pins)

but he says he seldom use the wireless charging anymore, because quite slow.

user posted image
normal backplate, NO coil, got pins



This post has been edited by 881118: Oct 1 2013, 07:32 PM
SUSdestEX
post Oct 1 2013, 07:29 PM

oink oink
*******
Senior Member
3,432 posts

Joined: Apr 2010



btw i notice the s-view cover don't really protect the edges huh, although got a bit buffer area from the cover but not being protected is doh.gif

126 Pages « < 48 49 50 51 52 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0275sec    0.30    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 12:34 PM