Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
125 Pages « < 53 54 55 56 57 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V10, Merry X'Mas and Happy New Year

views
     
KYPMbangi
post Nov 1 2013, 10:54 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


US Navy cancels notice on F/A-18 fighter jet order plan

user posted image
QUOTE
WASHINGTON - The U.S. Navy on Thursday canceled a notice about a possible
order of up to 36 more Boeing Co F/A-18 fighter jets or EA-18G electronic warfare planes
after the posting on a federal procurement website sparked confusion this week.


The pre-solicitation notice, which first became public this week, had triggered renewed questions about the Navy’s
commitment to the 392 billion radar-evading F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program by Lockheed Martin Corp.  

Boeing has sought for years to sell the Navy more of its F/A-18E/F Super Hornets for use on aircraft carriers, as a
hedge in case the more capable carrier variant of the F-35 fighter jet runs into further delays or technical challenges.   

Navy officials this week said they had no plans to buy more Super Hornets or EA-18G Growlers in fiscal 2015 despite
the notice on a federal procurement website. They said the notice was meant to ensure the “proper acquisition process”
was in place if more U.S. or foreign orders materialized. 

But the posting caught Pentagon officials by surprise, since the current Navy budget calls for F/A-18 funding to end in
fiscal 2014, with production of the planes to end in 2016.  

It was not immediately clear why Naval Air Systems Command, or Navair, decided to cancel the notice, which was
first posted Oct. 17. The procurement website was updated on Thursday to say the notice had been canceled,
but no explanation was provided.  

Officials with Navair, which oversees aviation programs such as the F/A-18, could not be reached for comment. - Reuters


[The Star]
[Reuters]


Comparison
user posted image

Growler spec
user posted image



While on another news, mrca programme is going to be delayed.. more..
Dammit

This post has been edited by KYPMbangi: Nov 1 2013, 11:18 AM
thpace
post Nov 1 2013, 11:25 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ Nov 1 2013, 10:54 AM)
US Navy cancels notice on F/A-18 fighter jet order plan

user posted image
[The Star]
[Reuters]
Comparison
user posted image

Growler spec
user posted image
While on another news, mrca programme is going to be delayed.. more..
Dammit
*
source of news for the mrca delay?
KYPMbangi
post Nov 1 2013, 11:32 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(thpace @ Nov 1 2013, 11:25 AM)
source of news for the mrca delay?
*
[Berita Hari2]

QUOTE
LONDON: Keputusan Malaysia untuk membeli jet pejuang baru menggantikan 18 pesawat MiG-29
buatan Russia mungkin mengambil masa kerana negara kini memberi tumpuan untuk mengurangkan
bajet defisitnya, kata Datuk Seri Najib Razak.

azriel
post Nov 1 2013, 11:33 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
QUOTE(thpace @ Nov 1 2013, 11:25 AM)
source of news for the mrca delay?
*
From source

QUOTE
Boeing's F/A-18 is also short-listed in Malaysia's competition to replace 18 Russian-made MIG-29s, but Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak told Reuters on Thursday that the country's decision could be delayed by budget pressures.



kernel123
post Nov 1 2013, 12:10 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,746 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(MrUbikeledek @ Nov 1 2013, 09:11 AM)
Only hezb are brave enough to retaliate. When the Israel launch artillery strike into lebanon, hezb will launch rocket into Israel.
*
why ah? is it that the hez is militant group? hmm.gif
thpace
post Nov 1 2013, 07:36 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
SGPV is mean for patrolling key economic zone. So instead of point defence for defending itself, should not it have area defence capabilities instead of point defence?

mica is marketed as point defence system and not area defence. RMN shoulf consider having area defence capacity instead of just self defence
Phillip_x
post Nov 1 2013, 07:46 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2013
QUOTE(thpace @ Nov 1 2013, 07:36 PM)
SGPV is mean for patrolling key economic zone. So instead of point defence for defending itself, should not it have area defence capabilities instead of point defence?

mica is marketed as point defence system and not area defence. RMN shoulf consider having area defence capacity instead of just self defence
*
soupir....Qui sommes-nous pour juger !

This post has been edited by Phillip_x: Nov 1 2013, 09:48 PM
TSyinchet
post Nov 1 2013, 08:29 PM

If you wish for peace, prepare for war
Group Icon
Elite
1,157 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Petaling Jaya

QUOTE(thpace @ Nov 1 2013, 07:36 PM)
SGPV is mean for patrolling key economic zone. So instead of point defence for defending itself, should not it have area defence capabilities instead of point defence?

mica is marketed as point defence system and not area defence. RMN shoulf consider having area defence capacity instead of just self defence
*
I dub really mind if mica were selected but the price tags must be reasonable.
So wait official announcement baru comment.

James831
post Nov 1 2013, 10:03 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
152 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
From: somewhere in PJ


QUOTE(yinchet @ Nov 1 2013, 08:29 PM)
I dub really mind if mica were selected but the price tags must be reasonable.
So wait official announcement baru comment.
*
what if SGPV use 2 type missiles for air defence,
MICA for short range, XXX missile for long range?
is it possible to do that?
Phillip_x
post Nov 1 2013, 10:03 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2013
QUOTE(yinchet @ Nov 1 2013, 08:29 PM)
I dub really mind if mica were selected but the price tags must be reasonable.
So wait official announcement baru comment.
*
soupir....ne fera aucune différence
thpace
post Nov 1 2013, 10:47 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(James831 @ Nov 1 2013, 10:03 PM)
what if SGPV use 2 type missiles for air defence,
MICA for short range, XXX missile for long range?
is it possible to do that?
*
impossible unless they have enough $$$$
Having two system is not cheap

maybe they can fit aster and mica if the VL system is compatible but then again, the radar system purchased or confirm is unable to support aster 15 sad.gif
TSyinchet
post Nov 1 2013, 10:55 PM

If you wish for peace, prepare for war
Group Icon
Elite
1,157 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Petaling Jaya

QUOTE(James831 @ Nov 1 2013, 10:03 PM)
what if SGPV use 2 type missiles for air defence,
MICA for short range, XXX missile for long range?
is it possible to do that?
*
Choose aster15/30 will be cheaper.
Or we can go for searams + mica/essm.
Phillip_x
post Nov 1 2013, 10:58 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2013
QUOTE(thpace @ Nov 1 2013, 10:47 PM)
impossible unless they have enough $$$$
Having two system is not cheap

maybe they can fit aster and mica if the VL system is compatible but then again, the radar system purchased or confirm is unable to support aster 15 sad.gif
*
This post has been edited by Phillip_x: Nov 2 2013, 12:04 AM
Phillip_x
post Nov 1 2013, 11:05 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2013
QUOTE(yinchet @ Nov 1 2013, 10:55 PM)
Choose aster15/30 will be cheaper.
Or we can go for searams + mica/essm.
*
This post has been edited by Phillip_x: Nov 2 2013, 12:04 AM
hafizushi
post Nov 2 2013, 12:30 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
28 posts

Joined: Aug 2010


QUOTE(yinchet @ Nov 1 2013, 10:55 PM)
Choose aster15/30 will be cheaper.
Or we can go for searams + mica/essm.
*
searams + essm + nsm would be the best combo for me
or mica + nsm also good

nsm with with stealth missile is very suitable for our sgpv design since its contain stealth element while still maintaining the effective range of 200km the same range as the exocet block 3

i have little doubt about essm since its a guided missile unlike mica its a fire and forget type of missile but it does hv awesome range of 50km and speed of mach 4+ unlike mica mach 3
TSyinchet
post Nov 2 2013, 12:45 AM

If you wish for peace, prepare for war
Group Icon
Elite
1,157 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Petaling Jaya

QUOTE(hafizushi @ Nov 2 2013, 12:30 AM)
searams + essm + nsm would be the best combo for me
or mica + nsm also good

nsm with with stealth missile is very suitable for our sgpv design since its contain stealth element while still maintaining the effective range of 200km the same range as the exocet block 3

i have little doubt about essm since its a guided missile unlike mica its a fire and forget type of missile but it does hv awesome range of 50km and speed of mach 4+ unlike mica mach 3
*
Depend on the budget.
TSyinchet
post Nov 2 2013, 12:43 PM

If you wish for peace, prepare for war
Group Icon
Elite
1,157 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Petaling Jaya

Happy deepavalli to all
azriel
post Nov 3 2013, 10:44 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
Indonesian Air Force Live Firing Exercise - Angkasa Yudha 2013.




kerolzarmyfanboy
post Nov 3 2013, 01:22 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
575 posts

Joined: Feb 2013
pinoys still pissed at us for LD..lol they still think we are coward for sending jets and artillery against them instead of mano-o-mano in the jungle..i had a good fight with them on FB..hehe like atre/heavyduty/yinchet said before, war's never fair.. biggrin.gif
prezioso
post Nov 3 2013, 01:36 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Jun 2011
Past AR singapore made

user posted image

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SR_88

user posted image

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAR_80

125 Pages « < 53 54 55 56 57 > » 
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0321sec    0.72    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 11:37 AM