Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
3 Pages  1 2 3 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V10, Merry X'Mas and Happy New Year

views
     
thpace
post Oct 14 2013, 07:56 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Oct 14 2013, 11:16 AM)
The decision to blow the 2 condor is coming from the the General Aboo Samah himself,
when he give the order to the ATGM team to blow it up, the US commander was looking at each other
they said that they would not have the guts to carried out  critical order such order without any authorization from Pentagon even though it was the best thing to do
*
what was in the condor until need to be blowed up?

or was it to prevent the apc from being repaired and used by the somalis militant?

QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Oct 14 2013, 01:08 PM)
That I don't know,
But at the ops center at the stadium where our Malbatt was stationed,
the US officer was stun with the swift decision to send the ATGM to destroy the condor by Aboo Samah
IINM one of them even asked him if he want to inform KL first and he said no that this is critical and time sensitive.
*
sorry but what is ATGM?
thpace
post Oct 18 2013, 03:53 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
seem like tldm and tudm is having a shopping spree..

any procurement by Malaysia army? They like keeping silent only. Do hope they can get some advance SAM like S400 or at least S300

seeing SG have going for aster, i think Malaysia would like go for russian.
thpace
post Oct 22 2013, 07:21 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
^ while also gauge each other personal army strength and possible shopping list to rival each other
thpace
post Oct 22 2013, 07:28 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(kerolzarmyfanboy @ Oct 22 2013, 07:25 PM)
info plz~ whats the red and yellow rings means?  sad.gif
*
I think,
yellow current capability
red with new SU-35
thinner red line possible with external fuel tank or air refueling

now i can see why Malaysia move their air base toward north and sub base at sabah. whistling.gif
Now let see if malaysia will get new longer range SAM System to counter a rising threat from china
thpace
post Oct 23 2013, 11:28 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Oct 23 2013, 12:31 AM)
benda baru plan, US plak beriya2 nak bagi barang!
*
If it something neighbor does not have or similar, Malaysia would most likely it take it. Seeing our past purchase history

So offer dulu, tengok we angkat the bait tak.

QUOTE(ichi_24 @ Oct 23 2013, 12:34 AM)
Murica also want to reconcile our business partnership back laugh.gif
*
Russia always wait and see, then just offer after reviewing others. Most can see Russian offer the best bargain for any deals
For marine, i think that not russian forte so they dont offer it, even if they have US have better equipments suited for marine than russia

Plus, Malaysia also have to buat muka with US buy something.. if not US muka masam tak beli apa-apa from him tongue.gif
Although, Malaysia preference now was from Europe and former soviet states

Malaysia air defense should improve since china planned SU-35 can now enter Malaysia air space. Long-range and mid range would be nice. Would be nice if there one SAM at peninsular and another at sabah. If any china jet come in, shoot them down into the south china sea laugh.gif
Wonder what anti aircraft system malaysia going to go for? Russian S300 or if lucky their new S400 or US Patriot system. Europe unlikely since SG sudah beli dari mereka whistling.gif
thpace
post Oct 23 2013, 11:30 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Oct 23 2013, 11:28 AM)
USS Denver salah satu kapal paling tua woo
tp dia nak bagi penuh, with LCAC ngan semua marine eq dlm perut kapal tu
on my 1st thought kalo tuk buat establish for us to learn the trades takde salah
tp on deeper thought, idak la kot
hahaha
*
tu Dokdo-class tak jadi?

i thought South Korea even offer malaysia a smaller size one laugh.gif
thpace
post Oct 23 2013, 12:00 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Oct 23 2013, 11:33 AM)
I remember, some one from Air force defense said that US offer us NASAMS when we wanted to retire the starburst
then the Pantsir hype up and now all quiet  vmad.gif
*
I also read but so far so silent already.. Tu jernas i tengok macam tembak nyamuk. Need more capable system for malaysia air defense

That i why say.. straight go for long range instead of short or medium range for future needs. Jernas should be able to cover short range requirements. I think two battalion of S300 would be nice each opposite of malaysia. Any nyamuk come in.. straight swim into south china sea tongue.gif

QUOTE(periuk_api1209 @ Oct 23 2013, 11:34 AM)
USS Denver tu kalu dah offer murah siap ngan package heli ngan AAV,  ambik jer buat permulaan..pastu leh tambah ngan Dokdo..hahahah
*
iinm, malaysia doctorate dont like buy second hand things unless is the best bargain unlike pinoy watever US offer angkat dulu laugh.gif

Plus, the cost of retrofitting and modify to suit our needs, would take up additional cost. Unless, US give us the denver for FREE rolleyes.gif

QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Oct 23 2013, 11:37 AM)
aku pun tak tau, senyap semacam
kes sama jugak, korea offer dokdo, french offer mistral

Malaysia pening  rclxub.gif
and both got stood up  laugh.gif
*
since kd inderapura fire and decommision, Malaysia lack landing ship. P

if mistral, straight can put our maybe eurocopter tiger on it whistling.gif
bundle deal

it like alot of things to buy but putrajaya dunno wat to buy 1st since everywhere offer us

thpace
post Oct 23 2013, 12:09 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(zimhibikie @ Oct 23 2013, 12:05 PM)
I forgot about Indon Makassar-class  tongue.gif  tongue.gif  tongue.gif

Indon can build their own LPD, Malaysia bila lagi? tak rasa tercabar ke?  laugh.gif  laugh.gif  laugh.gif
*
nanti kena Scorpène sunk whistling.gif
thpace
post Oct 23 2013, 12:14 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(zimhibikie @ Oct 23 2013, 12:11 PM)
dunno if Indon got good ASW, but they also got subs and have more experience in using subs than us  tongue.gif  tongue.gif  tongue.gif

alang2 tu, beli je la Zubr-class hovercraft  tongue.gif  tongue.gif  tongue.gif
*
ours more modern

zubr class tu macam gajah plus bising macam anjing gila. It like telling everyone within i am coming. Even starting it will wake everyone at base up
thpace
post Oct 23 2013, 03:18 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(zimhibikie @ Oct 23 2013, 12:18 PM)
or maybe its telling everyone I am coming, so everyone will shit in their pants  tongue.gif  tongue.gif  tongue.gif

any hovercraft will make big noise, even those puny pathetic hovercrafts the Brits are using..but the uss denver is bundled with aav and some lcac, why not go buy...with the possibility of armed conflict in south china sea, we can either be US or China's beetch..
*
lcac?

tat thing is a waste of money.. even US see no benefits in it already plus maintenance is huge. It will be useful if in beach assault landing like in ww2. Mass force come in

but now it all about tactical strike precision. get in get out asap. That why all are going for amphibious armed vehicles that can provide support and bring toops until main force arrive instead of dedicated unarmed transporter like lcac

QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Oct 23 2013, 12:20 PM)
aku rasa dlu ada team bousted gi belajor/evaluate Rotterdam Class sama Galicia Class, tp macam biasa... senyap jugak

me thinks the climax to this was when Korean are offering us their Go Jun Bong class LST until the arrival of Dokdo
since Malaysia senyap we have to wait until next DSA or LIMA
*
Dokdo macam cheaper than mistral if the smaller version. Plus since got hali pad.. much better also for our eurocopter to land in big area

QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ Oct 23 2013, 02:46 PM)
it's not about boleh buat ke x boleh. like our brand new training ship. we build it under DSME supervision. but now with all them FAC replacement, OPV project, lekiu batch 2? heheh .....cukup tangan ke nk buat benda2 ne semua  laugh.gif

besides afaik makassar-class design is derived from ferry so i don't think it's that complicated. it's not the shipbuilding itself that we have prob, but the electronic suite (radar, sonar, system integration,etcetc )
*
lekiu bathc 2?

i thought sudah replace with next generation patrol vehicle and LCS Gowind

BTW, air and navy macam ada news, our land army no list to buy?

This post has been edited by thpace: Oct 23 2013, 03:34 PM
thpace
post Oct 23 2013, 11:05 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Oct 23 2013, 05:36 PM)
user posted image

user posted image

not sure your can read chinese or not, from chinapress, Army interested on LY-80
*
china stuffs?

i think malaysia still like western equipments. i heard news of Russia willing to offer their S300 system to us. Thus, making us the among the first within the SEA region with long range air defense capabilities. Of course, it does not come cheap even for a country tat frequently buy their weapons sweat.gif

US banyak susah.. nak beli their barang so many procedures and worse it like we renting and canot change or modify without their permission.

plus, future threat most likely coming from china. Tak kan we want buy equipments from state who built their own weapon. surely they know the weakness and possible ways to hack and dis-activate it. whistling.gif


QUOTE(yinchet @ Oct 23 2013, 09:18 PM)
It based on damen enforcer ldp design
*
is dokdo class too big for our LDP?

but it look nice wub.gif

thpace
post Oct 24 2013, 03:18 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Oct 23 2013, 11:41 PM)
think too much ..... our Mindef can't afford S-300 ... long range defense missile
some china stuff Value for money.... just like army buying FN-6
Just like in Turkey HQ-Q(FD-2000) more cheaper and more advance than S-300 and get some TOT from china....
Singapore already buying Aster 30.. SAM system
back to LY-80 just middle range defense Missile 50km range, just suitable for now for our defense missile and TOT more suitable to capability of local defense company。
*
HQ-Q is based on S300 anyway which china license built. So dont expect it to be cheaper but then again CHINA? It not their things is bad but you are essentially buying from would be enemy in future. Common sense will say better dont who know wat they planted inside sweat.gif
Unlike patriot, S300 can be adapted for any requirement, medium range and long range
Just change the missile and you can have different capabilities. So it not like wow.. MALAYSIA suddenly get anti ballistic missile capability doh.gif

Plus, if malaysia sure will have some modification to it s300 system, maybe integrate some European parts instead of 100% Russia. So we may or may not see a new variant of S300 system if Malaysia were to purchase.
According to potential S300 sales to syria, one S300 system likely to cause around $110~$200Million including missiles.

We already have china at our doorsteps. Having TOT is like inviting a robber coming into your house and you know he confirm will steal something.

QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ Oct 24 2013, 02:08 AM)
with the debacle surrounding james shoal,spratlys,etcetc, i have huge doubt that Mindef will seriously considers chinese weaponry, especially the one with such strategic importance (klu setakat ATGM or manpads boleh lagi la kot)

no matter.plenty other option out there. if PAC-3 or S-300 is considered as out of reach, we can always opt other systems. them korean KM SAM is nice, but the system will be only fully operational in 2018.

there's other system that we can consider. NASAMS, Buk M2, maybe can also ask Unker sam for surplus PAC-2
*
PAC-3 i think highly unlikely.. uncle sam does not thrust us that much tongue.gif *YET
I was surprise SG didnt go for Patriot considering how closer they are to uncle sam than US. They still emo we didnt but their Super Hornet last time tongue.gif

I think mindef, initially was concern about china warships and that is why they are rapidly buying & installing Exocet anti-ship missile.
Suddenly, China will have SU-35 and air base closer to us. Now SAM also important in to buy list

This post has been edited by thpace: Oct 24 2013, 03:24 AM
thpace
post Oct 24 2013, 10:04 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(zimhibikie @ Oct 24 2013, 09:06 AM)
looks damn nice...guess no funding..pity, if develop properly, then can market to other countries..
besar tul main gun dia  tongue.gif  tongue.gif  tongue.gif ...bukan slalu ye for this type of vessels, only have air defense capabilities?
Vietnam already got that..
I tot US once offered us PAC-3, knock down version but still a PAC-3..I agree with u, medium-long range SAM is essential..
*
tat was b4 Vietnam. If we have taken tat offer, we have the system by now.

thats why malaysia not interested in buying us stufts. a knock down version? better get a full version from other country plus can add in this and that.
thpace
post Oct 24 2013, 05:11 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ Oct 24 2013, 07:21 AM)
I think mindef has this kind of mentality of that the best anti-aircraft weapon is simply another aircraft i;e interceptor/superiority type
Someone must a make a point that maintaining a battery or two mid/long range sam is a very good and a cheaper solution to counter enemy air intrusion

Taiwan and China sam range
user posted image
*
one at kelantan another at sabah.. any one come in better learn how to swin in south china sea. hehehe

syria can get it for usd100 million. I think that is cheaper than buying aircraft and arming them.
according to s300 tech sheet, it missile come in sealed cannister and require no major maintenance

QUOTE(zimhibikie @ Oct 24 2013, 10:06 AM)
thats the problem, buying either US, Russian, Chinese or European has its own disadvantage..
*
it like buying a expensive car but can only drive and not add any accessories

better buy proton letak turbo. sama juga 4 roda
QUOTE(Phillip_x @ Oct 24 2013, 03:01 PM)
Also all the talk of the Baby Dokdo seem to me to be quite irrelevant as the Dokdo is built by  Hanjin under the Hyundai group while DSME is their competitor. Also to clarify my earlier post it was a contract for 5 ships..the types were unspecified nor the country but to date we are the only ones who fit the bill, so to speak. The two training vessels cost around US$40m to US$50 m or so each leaving around US$900m and this amount in itself would preclude them from being vessels of the training type.
*
if have noticed dsme and hanjin design for the lpd is not the same. It not uncommon for company even of same country to offer two diff built. Dokdo design seem can fit more heli on top dec.
thpace
post Oct 27 2013, 02:14 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(ikmal2129 @ Oct 27 2013, 11:59 AM)
user posted image

SOUTH CHINA SEA (Oct. 25, 2013)
Royal Malaysian Navy patrol vessel KD Pahang (171) is
underway along side the U.S. Navy's forward-deployed
aircraft carrier USS George Washington (CVN 73) during a
training exercise.

user posted image

SOUTH CHINA SEA (Oct. 25, 2013)
U.S. Navy F/A-18 Super Hornets and Royal Malaysian air
force Su-30MKM aircraft conduct a fly-by over the U.S.

user posted image

SOUTH CHINA SEA (Oct. 25, 2013)
(From top to bottom) The U.S. Navy's forward-deployed
aircraft carrier USS George Washington (CVN 73), steams
alongside Royal Malaysian navy Kedah-class offshore
patrol vessel KD Pahang (172), Ticonderoga-class guided-
missile cruiser USS Antietam (CG 54), and Arleigh Burke-
class guided-missle destroyer USS McCampbell (DDG 85)
during a training exercise.
*
Aiya.. ours look like a speedboat when pictured together with US ships tongue.gif

so small in size if compared..

BTW our lekiu class 2nd batch it is still on or sudah cancelled?

This post has been edited by thpace: Oct 27 2013, 02:20 PM
thpace
post Oct 27 2013, 09:13 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ Oct 27 2013, 04:04 PM)
replace with SGPV. at 3000 tonnes and costing MYR1.5bil, it's pretty much a frigate
*
but why it called Patrol vessel?
thpace
post Oct 27 2013, 09:53 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Oct 27 2013, 09:44 PM)
news from france... 3/oct

(using google translate)
http://www.latribune.fr/entreprises-financ...le-de-mbda.html  

Defence: three new export contracts into the hands of MBDA

MBDA wins in Malaysia and ... Vietnam

MBDA is waiting for a notification (LOA or Letter of Approval) a contract for the installation of missile on the six corvettes Gowind, whose design was sold by DCNS kind . The amount of the order is valued at just under 100 million euros. But who says shooting facilities said future orders missiles. MBDA and should sell surface-to-air missiles VL Mica, and anti-ship Exocet block 3. The future control is estimated between 300 and 400 million euros. A beautiful victory over U.S. rivalRaytheon who presented the ESSM (Evolved Sea Sparrow Missile).

Reportedly, MBDA will also equip them with the VL Mica and Exocet two corvettes Dutch shipyard Damen purchased by Vietnam (+ two optional). A new very nice shot for MBDA.

In addition to these three contracts, MBDA never announces the signing of the export contracts due to the discretion of the customer, was up, according to La Tribune, some nice contracts, which will join the orders of 2013 . And maybe even surpassed the record in 2012 (1.5 billion euros) . Especially if the missile is able to finally get one of mégacontrats on which it competes, including through combat aircraft (including Rafale, Eurofighter and Gripen but even Tornado).

VL-MICA win..... ?
sad news if true .....
*
http://www.defencereviewasia.com/articles/...into-two-halves

RMN prefer sea spparow and naval strike missile for it sgpv. I think because sea sparow is battle proven in sea combat while mica is relatively new system

but seem that there no fund and have to go for cheaper option. Then again why cant the gomen give wat the navy wants for national defence instead of some program of giving free money everywhere doh.gif

like there no priority for defense instead donate and throw money everywhere

This post has been edited by thpace: Oct 27 2013, 09:56 PM
thpace
post Oct 27 2013, 10:30 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(yinchet @ Oct 27 2013, 09:58 PM)
If it is true than our sgpv is not even worth the money we are paying.
What more we are only equip it with ds30m as ciws.
Only retard justified such purchase.
Tldm lost the battle entirely. First setis, than mica than exocets.
There we go buy proton with a ferari price tags.
*
it like we buy a ferrari shell but use engine from proton.. doh.gif

exocets is so commonly used and ppl already know how to counter it. Plus it cheap armament for such an expensive ship


QUOTE(waja2000 @ Oct 27 2013, 10:01 PM)
some big amount is pay for TOT and Intellectual Property(IP) licensing  for local production. (some military expert said)
*
IP by right should come together with the ship. It not a separate accessories where we have to buy

QUOTE(yinchet @ Oct 27 2013, 10:11 PM)
If they lower down the procurement cost then no problem.
But rm1.5bil for a ship with mica, ds30m, and exocet.
Boleh accept kah? Tak ada money or buying at a very high markup price?
Crap of bull for those who said that, show me the ip cost.
*
How the hell for such armement which the RMN also dont want can be selected? RMN no balls to fight?
thpace
post Oct 27 2013, 10:50 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(yinchet @ Oct 27 2013, 10:11 PM)
If they lower down the procurement cost then no problem.
But rm1.5bil for a ship with mica, ds30m, and exocet.
Boleh accept kah? Tak ada money or buying at a very high markup price?
Crap of bull for those who said that, show me the ip cost.
*
is tat ds30m is even considered a ciws?

at least give it a proper ciws like millenium or better phlax or it can get Goalkeeper
doh.gif doh.gif

This post has been edited by thpace: Oct 27 2013, 10:51 PM
thpace
post Oct 27 2013, 10:53 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(zimhibikie @ Oct 27 2013, 10:51 PM)
Gowind-class TLDM dh jadik mangsa songlap ke? fikir2 kan la..
*
based on armement macam sudah jadi mangsa.. rm1.6 billion

macam gajah hitam kena cat putih..

with this type of armament.. even Formidable-class frigate much better and cheaper.
Boleh jadi scout saja lah our sgpv doh.gif

This post has been edited by thpace: Oct 27 2013, 10:55 PM

3 Pages  1 2 3 >
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0597sec    0.48    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 01:39 AM