the matter is not bassy or not. the bad thing about M3300 sub is that its too muddy, just like the case with X300 and MP300.
lack of subwoofer crossover may be one. second is because lack of power. if u heard E3100, its much refined in the bass dept. but lacking of clarity.

i try bypassing subwoofer crossover in the klipsch gmx, it sounds as muddy as M3300, but then still sounds better because of the power...
anyway i think im gonna sell my gmx.

wtf it's hard to find something that really suits you isn't it?

This post has been edited by zs3889: May 2 2009, 07:14 PM

yeah i do but u kno, i need some immediate cash now...

i'll browse ebay and other forums for something better in the future...
GMX is the best 2.1 i've ever own. hope this guy offering my gmx quickly buy it... lol... how ur M3300SF? so far so good ?

My MX5021 will suffer from high pitch distortion when playing certain piano music, any of ur guys MX5021 got this problem?

Wow, that's kinda fast to sell it, you just bought it 1-2 months ago isn't it? What's ur next speaker I wonder

try to lower the input volume (windows sound card volume).

---

Added on May 2, 2009, 10:40 pma lot of entry level speakers has the same problem...the sub freq response is at the high range, 70-300hz, at this point the satellite also could produce the range from 100hz and up, thats why the bass seems can't separate from the satellite and made the sound 'muddy'.

This post has been edited by coolkwc: May 2 2009, 10:40 PM

i got an offer to get an klipsch i-fi thats why i wanna sell it.
unless i get the i-fi, i wont release my gmx. lol

no wonder...

I'm satisfied la, since I only can afford an entry level speaker at the moment

1st time i get the M3300 also happy. much better than competitor, VS4121.
later than kena poison here and there, then infected...

i forgot, u were lucky, because u get M3300SF instead of M3300, with more RMS and slimmer sat.
when i need a speaker, only M3300 avail that time... and i purposely choose M3300 because of its slim sat.

This post has been edited by nismo91: May 3 2009, 02:25 PM

Actually not much differences between SF and normal, someone even said normal better

well this is normal perception for majority of forumers, normal/old batch/1st batch better than redesign/2nd batch because redesign/2nd batch = cut cost, although i'm not totally agree on that.

well, i suppose the SF is better, because the RMS is higher, means the op-amp used should be better than the normal.

and, since the SF much more thinner, its better, can just blu-tack to the wall then so thin liao.

but for the altec mx5021, i had to say, the 1st batch is better than the 2nd one. vs4121 and atp3, havnt heard yet...

Except post from Jimmy Blog and Techenclave, anyone have other link to mod newer version of MX5021 ?

This post has been edited by Faint: May 4 2009, 11:27 PM

For Edifier I'm not sure, as for AL, there's bloody hell big diff btw the older and newer batch.

when you come into audio world. do not listen to idiot. talking about speaker without knowledge about electronic are really bullshit. get degree first and we come to talk about.

Not much differences for the thickness as well just shiny a bit..

Chillax boss , this is discussion thread, it's where we learn and talk about speakers. I don't think we need degree to differentiate between a gd and poor SQ.

yes, its about 1 month i use. then i sell it back.
just acquire my klipsch ifi from ebay. this Caucasian bought it from Adelphi about a year ago.

sounds excellent for music. and can go exceptionally loud. only GMX is boomer. ifi sub is very2 smooth.

at first they talk. second day they open speaker box.

Jimmy's is the old one, the guide on Techenclave refers to the new one. The ones I did on mine are similar to the Techenclave guide with the exception of a few tweaks I thought sounded better.