Why driving a safe car makes sense
|
|
 Jul 24 2013, 04:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Newbie
9 posts Joined: May 2012 
|
QUOTE(sleepwalker @ Jul 24 2013, 04:43 PM) This is not a fair comparison as cars from the early 90s didn't have to face strict regulations in safetly. Most cars from that era are nothing more than eggshells on wheels. They didn't build bad cars then, it is just that the regulations that they have to follow were bad. I think it is about putting more importance on safety instead of RV when choosing cars. Not which car is better or worse. |
|
|
Jul 24 2013, 06:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Newbie
9 posts Joined: May 2012
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtxd27jlZ_g
2009 Chevy Malibu vs 1959 Chevy Bel Air, a SOLID, METAL car. Malaysians would test by knocking the cars skin and listed to the sound. And we'd say the Bel Air is SOLID and QUALITY! |
|
|
Jul 26 2013, 05:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Newbie
9 posts Joined: May 2012
|
QUOTE(Martinis @ Jul 26 2013, 05:35 PM) Looking at the current Accord, only the 2.4 have dual side airbags. The 2.0 dun have even costing close to 150k. Fxxk!! Just went to honda website, yeah no side airbag. Don't think Camry 2.0 has it too.This post has been edited by sanadi: Jul 26 2013, 05:53 PM |
| Change to: |  0.0263sec
 0.39
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 10:59 AM |
Quote