Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
119 Pages « < 35 36 37 38 39 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V9, Happy birthday Malaysia & ATM ke 50 & 80

views
     
kerolzarmyfanboy
post May 22 2013, 06:58 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
575 posts

Joined: Feb 2013
QUOTE(wanvadder @ May 22 2013, 06:37 PM)
user posted image

Aircraft Carrier in different sizes.
*
should have add the Nimitz-class..that monsterous carrier.. biggrin.gif
SUSMrUbikeledek
post May 22 2013, 06:59 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


I believe R-73 doesn't have datalink like the AIM-9X.
noavatar
post May 22 2013, 07:18 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Mar 2013


QUOTE(kerolzarmyfanboy @ May 22 2013, 06:53 PM)
1.8 mil per missile?? damnnn~ whats the price for a Russian Amraamski?
*
Malaysia bought 35 Vympel R-77 RVV-AE air-to-air missiles last year ......The missile deal is worth RM106.4 million ($35 million).


Source




This post has been edited by noavatar: May 22 2013, 07:21 PM
kerolzarmyfanboy
post May 22 2013, 07:33 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
575 posts

Joined: Feb 2013
QUOTE(noavatar @ May 22 2013, 07:18 PM)
Malaysia bought 35 Vympel R-77 RVV-AE air-to-air missiles last year ......The missile deal is worth RM106.4 million ($35 million).
Source
*
ooo..so 800k dollar cheaper than an AIM-9X..
noavatar
post May 22 2013, 07:45 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Mar 2013




The Russians have always been excellent missile designers and their AAM's, SAM's, MANPADs and Theatre weapons are well regarded. The sidewinder 9x is said to be a far superior short range hitter though.

It was mentioned somewhere that the Russians offered to develop and share data on a longer range R-77 if Australia purchased SU-35's.

Talking bout Russian technology....I also heard that many years ago during FPDA (Five Powers Defence Arrangements) exercise, the RMAF Migs give the RAAF F/A-18A pilots an unpleasant surprise when the Migs were able to "defeat" The RAAF "Bugs" in the simulated combat. Because of this that the RAAF decide to acquire some AMRAAM and the JHMMCS capability
ayanami_tard
post May 22 2013, 11:26 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
QUOTE(noavatar @ May 22 2013, 05:32 PM)
user posted image
*
i just love how russian media conveniently used F-22 as the target. hell even the french used F-22 as target as well
noavatar
post May 22 2013, 11:42 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Mar 2013


QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ May 22 2013, 11:26 PM)
i just love how russian media conveniently used F-22 as the target. hell even the french used F-22 as target as well
*
I have the feeling that US aviation development will be much affected by their economy....after all military industrial complex need sales....and their govt has been strict about selling only to their allies...look at how the French have twice downsize their Rafale requirements this year....which is the reason why they are not giving up on the Indian salaes.....while the Russians are looking for new markets everywhere....and their fourth and fifth generation developments are onstream
ayanami_tard
post May 23 2013, 12:03 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
it's all about keeping the price down. the US approach to F-22 is to start from scratch, by developing from new canvas.new engine, new radar, new computer system,etc.

what the russian did is by using existent technology and refine it. the russian benefitted from their parallel aircraft development,which some of its system predates the airframe itself(TVC-capable engine, IRST, AESA-capable radar,etc). all they have to do is to design an airframe with stealth capability and put existing equipment in it

what i foresee in the future is that only 4 country that are capable to produce their own fighter;US of A, russia, japan and china. other country will rely on JV, akin to eurfighter typhoon.

South Korea already have strong military ties with Turkiye, while the french are considering joint effort with brazil. india will always be india; a fiasco
noavatar
post May 23 2013, 12:16 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Mar 2013


QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ May 23 2013, 12:03 AM)
it's all about keeping the price down. the US approach to F-22 is to start from scratch, by developing from new canvas.new engine, new radar, new computer system,etc.

what the russian did is by using existent technology and refine it. the russian benefitted from their parallel aircraft development,which some of its system predates the airframe itself(TVC-capable engine, IRST, AESA-capable radar,etc). all they have to do is to design an airframe with stealth capability and put existing equipment in it

what i foresee in the future is that only 4 country that are capable to produce their own fighter;US of A, russia, japan and china. other country will rely on JV, akin to eurfighter typhoon.

South Korea already have strong military ties with Turkiye, while the french are considering joint effort with brazil. india will always be india; a fiasco
*
Chinese are cloners
heavyduty
post May 23 2013, 12:42 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
127 posts

Joined: Aug 2010


QUOTE(kerolzarmyfanboy @ May 22 2013, 06:58 PM)
should have add the Nimitz-class..that monsterous carrier..  biggrin.gif
*
the Gerald R. Ford class has the same hull size as the (new) Nimitz clas
noavatar
post May 23 2013, 01:19 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Mar 2013


This monster is even larger than the Nimitz class!


user posted image







kerolzarmyfanboy
post May 23 2013, 03:41 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
575 posts

Joined: Feb 2013
QUOTE(noavatar @ May 23 2013, 01:19 AM)
This monster is even larger than the Nimitz class!
user posted image
*
mmm..this design..must be modified from the scrapped Soviet's Ulyanovsk supercarrier design..looks similar in shape..
kerolzarmyfanboy
post May 23 2013, 04:26 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
575 posts

Joined: Feb 2013
QUOTE(noavatar @ May 23 2013, 12:16 AM)
Chinese are cloners
*
damn rite..a good cloner too..i'm waiting for Shenyang J-20 though..wonder how well it would be compare to F-35 or other stealth jets..
souless223
post May 23 2013, 04:47 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
60 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
is anybody kind enough to share malaysian confirm procurement
and possible procurement(in negotiation /final decision)
just wondering biggrin.gif
atreyuangel
post May 23 2013, 08:19 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



QUOTE(souless223 @ May 23 2013, 04:47 AM)
is anybody kind enough to share malaysian confirm procurement
and possible procurement(in negotiation /final decision)
just wondering biggrin.gif
*
rilek bang, baru tukar menteri tuu!
SUSMrUbikeledek
post May 23 2013, 08:26 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(noavatar @ May 23 2013, 01:19 AM)
This monster is even larger than the Nimitz class!
user posted image
*
QUOTE(kerolzarmyfanboy @ May 23 2013, 03:41 AM)
mmm..this design..must be modified from the scrapped Soviet's Ulyanovsk supercarrier design..looks similar in shape..
*
it's not real la.
noavatar
post May 23 2013, 10:31 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Mar 2013


QUOTE(MrUbikeledek @ May 23 2013, 08:26 AM)
it's not real la.
*
You are rite....only exist in the virtual world
noavatar
post May 23 2013, 11:03 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Mar 2013


Do you know that we almost had a nuclear war in 1983………

The Man Who Saved the World

On September 26, 1983 Lt Col. Stanislav Yevgrafovich Petrov was the duty officer at the command center for the Oko nuclear early-warning system when the system reported a missile being launched from the United States. Petrov judged that the report was a false alarm. This decision is credited with having prevented an erroneous retaliatory nuclear attack on the United States and its NATO allies, which could have resulted in large-scale nuclear war. Investigation later confirmed that the satellite warning system had malfunctioned.

Petrov, as an individual, was not in a position where he could have single-handedly launched any of the Soviet missile arsenal. But had Petrov reported incoming American missiles, his superiors might have launched an assault against the United States, precipitating a corresponding nuclear response from the United States.




kerolzarmyfanboy
post May 23 2013, 04:20 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
575 posts

Joined: Feb 2013
QUOTE(souless223 @ May 23 2013, 04:47 AM)
is anybody kind enough to share malaysian confirm procurement
and possible procurement(in negotiation /final decision)
just wondering biggrin.gif
*
blom lgi bro..lambat lagi..kabinet un xdeclare lagi ntuk discuss procurement2 nih kat dewan rakyat nanti..
Frostlord
post May 23 2013, 04:26 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,723 posts

Joined: Jun 2007


QUOTE(noavatar @ May 23 2013, 11:03 AM)
Do you know that we almost had a nuclear war in 1983………

The Man Who Saved the World

On September 26, 1983 Lt Col. Stanislav Yevgrafovich Petrov was the duty officer at the command center for the Oko nuclear early-warning system when the system reported a missile being launched from the United States. Petrov judged that the report was a false alarm. This decision is credited with having prevented an erroneous retaliatory nuclear attack on the United States and its NATO allies, which could have resulted in large-scale nuclear war. Investigation later confirmed that the satellite warning system had malfunctioned.

Petrov, as an individual, was not in a position where he could have single-handedly launched any of the Soviet missile arsenal.  But had Petrov reported incoming American missiles, his superiors might have launched an assault against the United States, precipitating a corresponding nuclear response from the United States.
*
close shave sweat.gif

119 Pages « < 35 36 37 38 39 > » 
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0314sec    0.75    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 11:25 AM