I dun really mind if the opposition bs crap out.
it would let the procurement under highlights which is a good thing as many malaysian dun care about such thing.

I prefer a much lighter and agile tank like the cv90120t instead of PT91
I wish to see AEW and MPA
More cb90s is much needed in sabah esszone

adnans will 1 heck of an ugly IFV with 120mm cannons.
cv90120T for the win

The above pic is of a CV90. Here are the pics of the BAE Ground Combat Vehicle. As you can see the massive add-on armor on each side of the hull.

viper without a doubt.
government would go for tiger though.

blackshark have more safety features than other helicopters..it should be given the chance to prove its capabilities in actual battle..great to see another blackshark's peminat here..i thought i was the only one..lol

Aku tak boleh nak cerita real figure of operation cost of 17 Squadron per annum,
takut nanti boleh disalah guna oleh orang yang tak bertanggung jawab serta ada harapan aku masuk lokap (hishhh mintak jauhhhhh~)

Typhoon.
1. Cost per aircraft mahal (T3)
2. Support crew ramai
3. Supports machine seperti, dehumidifier, total renovation of hanger to fully air condition, extra care product (nak jaga fuselage kat cuaca panas)
4. Limited technology due to many of it still in testing phase
5. Nak bayar duit kat 5 negara (remember that this plane is build from 5 different nation)
6. Not battlefield proved yet!

Superhornet (or other US plane)
The most best choice, in term of money and matured technology but
1. Limited technology, resource and weapon. Yes US will determined and controled what we will get. (The closer you with US, they will favour you. We are not that close to US like the SG, TH and Indo)
2. Close watch from the US congress and every major decision or modification on the toys need the US congress written consent.
3. Banyak procedure nak kene buat bila dealing with US toys.
4. Rujuk no.3 WE CAN'T GET WHAT WE WANT - kalau tidak in 2000++ kita dah pakai SH with AESA radar. Malaysia was the 1st country offered to have SH in exchange for their F/A-18D
5. Again political factor involved is huge
Rafale
1. Cost more than SH but less then Typhoon
2. Battlefield proven and good track record during Libya war where only the Rafale go deep to destroy SAM battery radars
3. Have a good weapon proven system.
4. We can built our own Rafale kat Malaysia
5. We can get what we want in term of weapon, system and sensors.
6. MKM have a similar system to Rafale so TUDM have operated a familiar system to Rafale (tak percaya tengok video pilot TUDM MKM pilot sekarang pakai helmet French)
7. Again, the weapon in rafale also can be used with MKM (MICA)

Gripen
1. The most economical choice
2. Less crew to operate and less support crew need
3. TUDM prefer dual engine but ready to make exception
4. Some parts esp the engine are US made, so tengok balik SH no.1
5. Good weapon system
6. Leased with option to buy are available.
7. A good interim replacement for MMRCA candidate (Rafale/Typhoon/SH) before the arrival in 2020
8. Good replacement for F5E fleet and Hawk!

so tengok sendiri la kenapa wa PILIH rafale over Typhoon! 

aik pasal aku ke?
err sapa2 loyer kat /K sila tolong aku mintak duit consultant dari France defense punya firm!

Watch world war Z. Good movie. I give 10 out of 10. That stupid doctor killed himself because of fail trigger control discipline . Ha ha ha

all asean countries began their military's shopping spree..meanwhile in malaysia, still struggling in the Mig-29 replacement programme, lacks of modern navy ships and patrol boats, opposition kept questioning military purchases like they know better than the generals of the ATM, etc..goddamnit Malaysia!