multirole support ship

ATM depends on these ships for sealift capability

logistics are currently crippled when that one ship got burned,but don't tell the sulus that

its not in our military culture.we're more known as 'quiet professionals' than chest beating monkeys

why is it when its ATM kills terrorists its acceptable to take pictures but when I take a picture of me tea-bagging a dead terrorist its suddenly 'poor taste' and a 'war crime'

F*ck you JAG

flait sarjan

sajen mejer bukan pangkat

lagipun,gile tua sajen mejer baru nak kawin

meh even a 7.62 round can make a hole the size of your fist

almost every tracked IFV looks like that,its the generic look for em'

unmanned turret,something for ATM to look into,better than their hard-on for one man turrets

ramainya polis gemuk.mana larinya standards

it ensures check and balance.silence will get the sharks hungry



on another topic,bangla senang2 boleh IC,aku nak visa bukan main payah

ASTROS.the one in the background looks like a Grad

crossing the ocean is one thing,TNI doesn't have the means to sustain an expeditionary force.plus they would get owned by the RAAF and RAN before they even reach Australia
rapid deployment force

a show that ranks military vehicles or units into a top 10 anything is retarded and gay

anyone who watches it is therefore homo by proxy

too late to defend yourself fag

btw,what was numbah one?T-34?

greedy bastards who siphon public money and hiding it in the name of 'security' is natang babi

izzah is just maintaining check and balance

Adnans with 120mm rifled cannons

This post has been edited by heavyduty: May 8 2013, 10:17 PM

fine,put some of those 90mm cockerill guns on the Adnan .The army ordered some ACVS for mortars,add some more for scorpion replacement

An armoured fire support weapon which will sustain the ACV-300 production line for a couple more years,reasonably heavy,and with 200+ adnans already in service,logistics and crew training wont be a problem



wider tracks doesn't matter when you can't cross bridges

This post has been edited by heavyduty: May 9 2013, 11:44 AM

It would be better just to mount a dedicated TOW launcher like they did with the bakhtar shikan because turret mounted TOWs like the M901 are known to be crap

M901 and NM142?

the M3 bradley,as a reconnaissance vehicle made first contact with the enemy so its not suprising they had more kills.I doubt most of it was the result of TOW hits.the vehicle needed to be stationary and its take a lot of time to set up the TOW,it is only used during an ambush or fired at stand off range

you have to take into account the human factor,shit like number of kills is grossly exaggerated

ko ni dari tadi the best of the best of the bestest of bestestetst

there's no such thing as the best.only what suits you the most


This post has been edited by heavyduty: May 11 2013, 02:59 AM

the USMC issues the M4 to officers and SNCOs

the US army are withdrawing the M16 in favour of the M4 in frontline service