Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
112 Pages « < 95 96 97 98 99 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Samsung Galaxy S4 (S IV?), The New King of Android?

views
     
bestofel
post Mar 31 2013, 03:27 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
528 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Klang Valley


I posted about it here la yesterday.

Source: http://www.sammobile.com/2013/03/20/your-c...ave-the-answer/
XeactorZ
post Mar 31 2013, 04:09 PM

♥ PandaDog ♥
*********
All Stars
31,607 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
QUOTE(joelucas91 @ Mar 31 2013, 11:01 AM)
The slimmer body has probably something to do with the new Gorilla Glass 3 as it is even thinner than it's predecessor smile.gif
*
gorilla glass 3 just the screen only
what I means is screen size @@
joelucas91
post Mar 31 2013, 05:38 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
436 posts

Joined: Apr 2011


QUOTE(XeactorZ @ Mar 31 2013, 04:09 PM)
gorilla glass 3 just the screen only
what I means is screen size @@
*
Yup, that's why I said SLIMMER. I didn't say the bezel is less and thinner because of the Gorilla Glass. I said the thickness of the phone is thinner because of the Gorilla Glass smile.gif
emy_xvidia
post Mar 31 2013, 06:23 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,735 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: Malaysia - Swindon Town
QUOTE(skyline100 @ Mar 30 2013, 09:16 PM)
Well it happens to every brand's fanboys.

Samsung's fans once bashed that the iphones' design are not innovative, well now look at S4 vs S3. Not to forget the original Galaxy S series design is an obvious copycat of iphone.
Nokia is so proud of it's polycarbonate design, keep on reusing it, until today still no major changes.
LG no need mention, look at the optimus pro G.
*
yup, i agree with you. Sadly thats the case nowadays. Nexus with their own fanboys, HTC, Samsung. biggrin.gif

just that, Im sticking with Samsung now due to the fact that they offer us freedom from Google demands; no SD slot, no removable battery. Not to say that Im biased on Samsung, but really, I am no Google yes-man either. Why would a customer follow what they want, which is to depend on the cloud, hence the 16GB max offering from the Nexus 4? I understand that its one of their money-makin part of businesses, but by restricting our options on local storage? Thats like, they're heading little by little to what Apple is now. Some might not agree with me with this, but this is just my opinion that what Samsung is offering, is a good thing for us. Freedom of not opting to go for the cloud, plus the removable battery, which as you know, battery capacity reduces with time. It's gonna be a whole lot cheaper to be able to take out the battery and replace it with another battery rather than having to send out the whole phone to the service centre in order to replace it. Rationally, why would you hate Samsung for allowing this, aside from championing the company that restricts our options? smile.gif

This post has been edited by emy_xvidia: Mar 31 2013, 06:24 PM
Andrewtst
post Mar 31 2013, 07:14 PM

Forgiveness is Happiness
*********
All Stars
29,764 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
From: Johor, Malaysia.


For me, as long storage 32gb and above, no point having SD card as that also lead to slower performance.

A lot normal user even 16GB also enough for them. I am not superb light user but definitely 32GB was enough for me.

I don't really see follow trend of removing sdcard is a bad move.

2nd - I never change battery for my phone in my life before. So with none removable battery can build better solid back cover is a plus for me. Nowadays a lot user change phone every year or at least two years per one. Within this period, normally battery still serve you well.

This post has been edited by Andrewtst: Mar 31 2013, 07:18 PM
Andrewtst
post Mar 31 2013, 07:23 PM

Forgiveness is Happiness
*********
All Stars
29,764 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
From: Johor, Malaysia.


QUOTE(XeactorZ @ Mar 31 2013, 03:52 AM)
totally no idea how they do it with slimmer body + narrow from s3 shakehead.gif

http://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone2=4238
but that s4 is using snapdragon s600
not exynos 5 octa, waiting for this <<<
*
Actually when you check on S III it was obvious they still room for them to fit in the extra 0.2mm screen size. It was possible. As for the slight slimmer was nothing impossible to happen.

As camera, I was damn surprise Samsung put in such narrow view of camera in S 4. This was really a big cons even but just compare itself with S III only.
Andrewtst
post Mar 31 2013, 07:26 PM

Forgiveness is Happiness
*********
All Stars
29,764 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
From: Johor, Malaysia.


QUOTE(girl83 @ Mar 31 2013, 11:59 AM)
for some reason, i always don't like first batch launch phone be it car, laptop, camera, etc.. feels like a testing mouse .. in chinese we called it "bai lao shu" lol
*
I always love to be "bai lao shu". Haha! Anything I want not getting in first hand make me feel outdated. tongue.gif

This post has been edited by Andrewtst: Mar 31 2013, 07:26 PM
girl83
post Mar 31 2013, 07:30 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,871 posts

Joined: Dec 2012


QUOTE(Andrewtst @ Mar 31 2013, 07:26 PM)
I always love to be "bai lao shu". Haha! Anything I want not getting in first hand make me feel outdated. tongue.gif
*
haha... you can report to us how its going when you get it during launching
SUSLordDenning
post Mar 31 2013, 07:33 PM

peanut butter jelly
******
Senior Member
1,502 posts

Joined: Oct 2012
QUOTE(Andrewtst @ Mar 31 2013, 07:23 PM)
Actually when you check on S III it was obvious they still room for them to fit in the extra 0.2mm screen size. It was possible. As for the slight slimmer was nothing impossible to happen.

As camera, I was damn surprise Samsung put in such narrow view of camera in S 4. This was really a big cons even but just compare itself with S III only.
*
Hmm. If im not mistaken, the narrow field of view is software related, so samsung might be able to do something about it before the official sales of the phone, or push updates out once people got their phone already.. Btw, according to GSM, S4 camera quality better than One wor. tongue.gif but One win S4 in terms of camera features. lol

This post has been edited by LordDenning: Mar 31 2013, 07:38 PM
girl83
post Mar 31 2013, 08:15 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,871 posts

Joined: Dec 2012


If people prefer camera quality, i think they will go for SONY tongue.gif
waveweaver
post Mar 31 2013, 08:21 PM

★★Android & Apple★★
********
All Stars
13,192 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
From: Middle of Avalon
QUOTE(girl83 @ Mar 31 2013, 08:15 PM)
If people prefer camera quality, i think they will go for SONY tongue.gif
*
Sony XperiaZ camera is....mehh doh.gif
emy_xvidia
post Mar 31 2013, 08:22 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,735 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: Malaysia - Swindon Town
QUOTE(Andrewtst @ Mar 31 2013, 07:14 PM)
For me, as long storage 32gb and above,  no point having SD card as that also lead to slower  performance.

A lot normal user even 16GB also enough for them. I am not superb light user but definitely 32GB was enough for me.

I don't really see follow trend of removing sdcard is a bad move.

2nd - I never change battery for my phone in my life before.  So with none removable battery can build better solid back cover is a plus for me. Nowadays a lot user change phone every year or at least two years per one. Within this period, normally battery still serve you well.
*
what i wrote just now is not about what you need or you think is sufficient. It's the freedom of having that option whereas other manufacturers have followed suit to what Google want. Everytime this is mentioned, cloud is something that most people would say is the future, not here, but on some other forums. Tell me, do you really wanna be that dependent on Google now? Well this is just my opinion btw, to me, its better having that options rather than not having it at all. smile.gif

This post has been edited by emy_xvidia: Mar 31 2013, 08:23 PM
waveweaver
post Mar 31 2013, 08:26 PM

★★Android & Apple★★
********
All Stars
13,192 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
From: Middle of Avalon
Having a sdcard slot and removable battery is a must for me. biggrin.gif
skyline100
post Mar 31 2013, 08:37 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
345 posts

Joined: Apr 2011
QUOTE(Andrewtst @ Mar 31 2013, 07:14 PM)
For me, as long storage 32gb and above,  no point having SD card as that also lead to slower  performance.

A lot normal user even 16GB also enough for them. I am not superb light user but definitely 32GB was enough for me.

I don't really see follow trend of removing sdcard is a bad move.

2nd - I never change battery for my phone in my life before.  So with none removable battery can build better solid back cover is a plus for me. Nowadays a lot user change phone every year or at least two years per one. Within this period, normally battery still serve you well.
*
QUOTE(emy_xvidia @ Mar 31 2013, 08:22 PM)
what i wrote just now is not about what you need or you think is sufficient. It's the freedom of having that option whereas other manufacturers have followed suit to what Google want. Everytime this is mentioned, cloud is something that most people would say is the future, not here, but on some other forums. Tell me, do you really wanna be that dependent on Google now? Well this is just my opinion btw, to me, its better having that options rather than not having it at all.  smile.gif
*
QUOTE(waveweaver @ Mar 31 2013, 08:26 PM)
Having a sdcard slot and removable battery is a must for me. biggrin.gif
*
The SD card slot is not that important for me, but I do know there are a lot of people need it. Sometimes the purpose is not because of expanding the storage, but for the portability. With SD card you can move and exchange data fast. Further more I think with SD card, hacking(jailbreak/root) will be easier.
Andrewtst
post Mar 31 2013, 08:49 PM

Forgiveness is Happiness
*********
All Stars
29,764 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
From: Johor, Malaysia.


QUOTE(girl83 @ Mar 31 2013, 07:30 PM)
haha... you can report to us how its going when you get it during launching
*
I not getting it. Hehe

QUOTE(LordDenning @ Mar 31 2013, 07:33 PM)
Hmm. If im not mistaken, the narrow field of view is software related, so samsung might be able to do something about it before the official sales of the phone, or push updates out once people got their phone already.. Btw, according to GSM, S4 camera quality better than One wor. tongue.gif but One win S4 in terms of camera features. lol
*

So.. buying phone look every part not only one part. Hehe. Htc one still outstanding and good enough serving me. smile.gif

And narrow view shall be sensor related which can't be solved by software.

QUOTE(girl83 @ Mar 31 2013, 08:15 PM)
If people prefer camera quality, i think they will go for SONY tongue.gif
*
Sony camera sensor ia good but sony not good given better output.

QUOTE(emy_xvidia @ Mar 31 2013, 08:22 PM)
what i wrote just now is not about what you need or you think is sufficient. It's the freedom of having that option whereas other manufacturers have followed suit to what Google want. Everytime this is mentioned, cloud is something that most people would say is the future, not here, but on some other forums. Tell me, do you really wanna be that dependent on Google now? Well this is just my opinion btw, to me, its better having that options rather than not having it at all.  smile.gif
*
I pick better look, feel and material. Without having that two options is better fo me. smile.gif Samsung clumsy fragile back cover all because of integration of removable battery, SD card still can be solved by put at side.

This post has been edited by Andrewtst: Mar 31 2013, 08:56 PM
girl83
post Mar 31 2013, 09:29 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,871 posts

Joined: Dec 2012


QUOTE(Andrewtst @ Mar 31 2013, 08:49 PM)
I not getting it. Hehe

So.. buying phone look every part not only one part. Hehe. Htc one still outstanding and good enough serving me. smile.gif

And narrow view shall be sensor related which can't be solved by software.
Sony camera sensor ia good but sony not good given better output.
I pick better look, feel and material. Without having that two options is better fo me. smile.gif Samsung clumsy fragile back cover all because of integration of removable battery, SD  card still can be solved by put at side.
*
sticking to your note2 or s3? or aiming for note 3?
Andrewtst
post Mar 31 2013, 09:46 PM

Forgiveness is Happiness
*********
All Stars
29,764 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
From: Johor, Malaysia.


QUOTE(girl83 @ Mar 31 2013, 09:29 PM)
sticking to your note2 or s3? or aiming for note 3?
*
Using S3 now, will switching to HTC one soon. smile.gif
girl83
post Mar 31 2013, 10:06 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,871 posts

Joined: Dec 2012


QUOTE(Andrewtst @ Mar 31 2013, 09:46 PM)
Using S3 now, will switching to HTC one soon. smile.gif
*
why htc? processor?
Andrewtst
post Mar 31 2013, 10:14 PM

Forgiveness is Happiness
*********
All Stars
29,764 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
From: Johor, Malaysia.


QUOTE(girl83 @ Mar 31 2013, 10:06 PM)
why htc? processor?
*
I cannot feel anything new on S 4. It was too much look like S III or Note II.

HTC one is something new look solid build with awesome spec. smile.gif
joytest
post Mar 31 2013, 10:18 PM

Vox populi vox dei? Quot homines,tot sententiae
********
All Stars
13,188 posts

Joined: Dec 2011
From: 127.0.0.1


QUOTE(skyline100 @ Mar 30 2013, 10:28 PM)
Funny because when I said trend, I mean "larger, thinner, lighter than its predecessor, more radio chips also bigger battery capacity", isn't this the trend of the flagships over the years? 5" is just a tiny part of the facts.

Not trying to argue, but I pointed out that every flagships are improving, not just S4, but are they enough to be called "innovative"? Bigger screen with similar size = innovative? That is the point. I think I had made myself quite clear. My bad maybe I should have made it more obvious for people.

You don't have to be that offensive, for sure you can support anything you like.
*
QUOTE(joelucas91 @ Mar 30 2013, 11:51 PM)
+1

I gotta admit that I am seriously not a fan of the iphone 5 when it was launched. Even now I'm still not a fan, but holding one in the hand, the design and materials used are top notch and the build of it exudes premium quality. Did I mention that it's seriously light too? smile.gif

The materials used are great and the feel is pretty awesome. Was seriously surprised, and in a pleasant way too. That said, I'm still not gonna buy one tongue.gif
*
Lighter, thinner, faster cpu, bigger battery , larger screen is all that's left in the race moving forward until someone creates something revolutionary. The laptop form factor has been the same for 20+ years, nobody complains it's a screen with kbd and battery. Even the macbook air is an extremely thin device that has the same elements.

QUOTE(emy_xvidia @ Mar 31 2013, 08:22 PM)
what i wrote just now is not about what you need or you think is sufficient. It's the freedom of having that option whereas other manufacturers have followed suit to what Google want. Everytime this is mentioned, cloud is something that most people would say is the future, not here, but on some other forums. Tell me, do you really wanna be that dependent on Google now? Well this is just my opinion btw, to me, its better having that options rather than not having it at all.  smile.gif
*
For cloudy fans, search for a recent legal case in the US last year whereby the judgment was that once it's on the cloud, Uncle Sam owns all your bits, not you.
I'd rather control my own bits thank you very much.

QUOTE(girl83 @ Mar 31 2013, 10:06 PM)
why htc? processor?
*


Our friend andrew trumps design over all.

112 Pages « < 95 96 97 98 99 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0198sec    0.40    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 06:43 AM