QUOTE(Duke Red @ Dec 27 2012, 11:41 AM)
Like it or loath it, BR will continue to play the way he wants the team to play. There has always been an argument between setting your side out to suite other teams, or do impose your style of play on others. Which is better? The Liverpool of old didn't care who they were up against. We played our way. A less glamorous team who does the same thing today is Stoke City. If you've got tall, big blokes, you lob the ball in to them. Everton did the same with Fellaini when they played us.
The question I have is this since I didn't watch the game. How does everyone reckon we could have done better against Stoke, tactically?
I myself would like a little steel in midfield, an enforcer of sorts. Stevie is getting on and the only other physical bloke we've got is Jonjo. Having said that, we could never have gone toe-to-toe with Stoke even if we had Mascherano or Hamann back in midfield. Could we have done better defensively knowing they are a physical side who dominates every opponent in that category?
Sometimes, the manager needs to admit the team is weak and not good enough.
A team that fail to have good run (very seldom win more than 2 match in a row, and leaking goal here and there and having some difficulty to score), yet the manager dare to say 2nd place is the aim not long ago (just after first 2 win in a row)?
http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story/_/...-second?cc=4716When the team is weak (everyone know Stoke is more physical strong and tend to play in this way), the team needs to adjust tactically to counter the opponents threat.
Still playing the same way, almost mean a gift to opponent.
The team only can impose your style of play, if the team is really good, typically Barca, MU, or having good strength is certain area (like Stoke with more physical factor, West Ham -direct football), Aka you scare me on this factor, instead I adjust myself.
While Liv is good at ???
Apart of having more possession than opponent, I do not see any strength that currently team has. Having more possession should mean opponent has little of the ball and less chance to score, but the reality is not, how many time, the team shipped more than 2 goal per game? 10 matches in 19.
The old Liv team can do, because they are good be it having good manager and good player and good winning mentality.
The match against Villa has exposed the defence deficiency seriously, just 2 week later, the same scoreline appear again, and same problem again (possession without goal while leaking 3 goals)
The Jan fixture is not going to be easy, MU, ManCity, Arsenal. The team easily slip into bottom half table again, if lose those matches. Have an aim on second place??
If keep on like this, it is matter of time, fans starting losing faith on the manager.
Added on December 27, 2012, 3:32 pmQUOTE(Duke Red @ Dec 27 2012, 03:11 PM)
We've experimented with various formations already this season but you are right in the sense that we play the same game of passing the ball about. The question I have it whether or not it is a good BR gained Swansea promotion playing tiki taka and they held their own in the Premiership despite being favourites to go back down. What is true is that this brand of football works, whether or not you are a fan of it. I am personally a fan of it. It isn't all about goals, a million stepovers and lung busting runs for me.
In my opinion it isn't about changing the way we play. It's about making adjustments to perfect it.
Why always need to talk about Swansea football?
Swansea league position was not better than Liv last season. 11th position.
Stat speaks all. Not kili kala or lala.
The brand of football may be enough for midtable and need not to worry about relegation, if Liv set its aim for it, then fine, no argument.
Many promoted team has overachieved it before as well. Swansea is the first to against the odd of favourite to go down.
Fulham, Charlton and many in the past as well.
I do not know why so many still talk about Swansea football, when the manager is managing Liv.
This post has been edited by cherroy: Dec 27 2012, 03:32 PM