QUOTE(SiuYi @ Nov 14 2012, 10:45 PM)
Which question? QUOTE(SiuYi @ Nov 14 2012, 07:23 PM)
i told u jor the design u want is much expensive from my side. paiseh ar.
eeeeeeeeeee...tarak tau malu......
This 1 ar? You're a seller right? That's why I say people love and hate me for the same reason la eeeeeeeeeee...tarak tau malu......
QUOTE(SiuYi @ Nov 14 2012, 08:28 PM)
can i say we charge the VS by starting the battery, but not the engine? i mean 1st click of the key, but not ignition.
and i'm very curious sg9999's vs is from which seller or brand?
By right the alternator send charge of 14.5 volts to the capacitor. When you off engine, the VS will send 14.5 volts to continue charge your batter until both VS and battery normalized at an agreeable value, then slowly discharge GUA. To find out more, better consult erictioh himself. These are my theory nia.and i'm very curious sg9999's vs is from which seller or brand?
Like coolkwc say, if you use a something super duper machine gun radar jammer chaohigh frequency meter to detect, you'll see the electric flow actually vary from time to time. The normal test meter only can show the round up figure. Me and magician have very little knowledge about electronics, but according to him due to the vary of voltage being sending in to the voltage stabilizers, the small capacitor actually very hard to fully charge itself and to send similar charge to medium/high capacitors is another pain in the butt. However, static charge might actually reduce the variance. Theoretically my way of "dry run in" with a static charger works even better then letting the alternator alone to charge the VS up.
Anyways, these are all theory and butt dyno effects. It could be my poor battery is going to drain, and after the static charged the engine response became powderful can also caused by the battery itself instead of the VS.
Eating dinner(supper) now, will post video after shower
Nov 14 2012, 11:15 PM

Quote
0.0276sec
0.33
6 queries
GZIP Disabled