Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

119 Pages « < 64 65 66 67 68 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Basic Intake and Exhaust Modification Guide, for normal aspirated cars v1.0

views
     
luqmanz
post Oct 12 2011, 04:00 PM

Trading Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,185 posts

Joined: Oct 2005


QUOTE(caarzee @ Oct 12 2011, 03:44 PM)
hi


I had been reading some of the forum replies (of recent ones), and this is just based on my understanding,

1) I need a (2.0 cc * 2L =) 4L bullet volume?
2) stick with 1.6" diameter pipping and stock muffler (i think it's U-shape)?
3) i don't think i want to go for hotbits due to rumours of "cracks".
4) how do I go about calc the tuned length of extractor and collector, or length before the termination box ie bullet/midbox? Staying at 3500RPM, and I played around with the online calculators, it was recommended that I'll go with extractor header of 48" (15"+33"). Is this correct? I am still at loss how to go about getting the length of collector.
5) I'm leaning against taking out the cat, and if I don't, kind of defeat the whole purpose right?
6) what will be your recommendation for the whole setup?

thanks.
*
Whats your engine Max HP and the RPM at Max HP ? (ok i found it)

4-2-1 header
Total length from exhaust port till the bullet = 51 inch (for RPM 3000) or 44 inch (for RPM 3500)
Bullet volume ... 4 lt ...
Can use Stock muffler if the flow rate is 305 Cubic feet per min ..
Remove the cat
Stock 1.6" piping should suffice ..

Just a suggestion lol ...

This post has been edited by luqmanz: Oct 12 2011, 04:35 PM
mADmAN
post Oct 12 2011, 04:09 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
10,530 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Petaling Jaya & Mid Valley


QUOTE(amir_tengkorak @ Oct 12 2011, 03:41 PM)
want to wait also caaaannnnnn...
confirm paling bising gila punya.. laugh.gif
*
well..with the newer higher compression... the exhaust is supposed to be louder brows.gif

imagine before this it was already very loud... wonder how loud the new setup is gonna be... this is gonna be.........interesting hehehhe


lucky i dont have high cams... otherwise.... brap brap brap brap brap brap

This post has been edited by mADmAN: Oct 12 2011, 04:11 PM
amir_tengkorak
post Oct 12 2011, 04:30 PM

Wow..Amazing...
******
Senior Member
1,347 posts

Joined: May 2009
From: From: From: From:


beli sudah..wei u still go for B20?
caarzee
post Oct 12 2011, 04:34 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
hi luqmanz,

140hp (103kW) at 6000rpm. I think the cutoff is around 6.5k rpm. never tried these though smile.gif

not sure if stock muffler is a straight flow. currently stock exhaust setup is as such
user posted image

I measured the length from header outlet (6.exhaust front tube) to bullet (10.exhaust center tube) is about 55".

As such, I just need to get
1) 4-2-1 extractor
2) get new pipping from exhaust outlet to bullet at 44" lenght
2) remove cat
3) get a 4L bullet
4) stay with stock muffler

did i get this right?

thanks.

This post has been edited by caarzee: Oct 12 2011, 04:45 PM
luqmanz
post Oct 12 2011, 04:37 PM

Trading Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,185 posts

Joined: Oct 2005


QUOTE(caarzee @ Oct 12 2011, 04:34 PM)
hi luqmanz,

140hp (103kW) at 6000rpm. I think the cutoff is around 6.5k rpm. never tried these though smile.gif

thanks.
*
Ok ... I amended the calculation above LOL ...


weeen11
post Oct 12 2011, 05:29 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
8 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
Wanna ask some sifu here, which header is better for auto car??? 4-2-1 or 4-1? And also S-flow or Straight flow muffler better ?
mADmAN
post Oct 12 2011, 06:04 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
10,530 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Petaling Jaya & Mid Valley


QUOTE(amir_tengkorak @ Oct 12 2011, 04:30 PM)
beli sudah..wei u still go for B20?
*
yup....need torque tongue.gif
kokhing520
post Oct 12 2011, 06:06 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: May 2011
From: KL



I want to ask ... Which distance is best for auto 1.0 from bullet tO the midbox and then to the tip?
upontheriversky
post Oct 12 2011, 09:42 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
12 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(amir_tengkorak @ Oct 12 2011, 09:17 AM)
JOM! but...where u guys staying leh?
*
im in desa petaling area, a bit far but no problem coming sunway


QUOTE(low yat 82 @ Oct 12 2011, 09:27 AM)
kanasai. meet up around sunway la.... wan go dyno ma... uponskyriver u dyno d? mayb we go dyno la..huhu.. easier to chat wit graph infront us biggrin.gif
*
no havent done, poket still got holes to sew haha but if all wanna do i think i can stretch my budget a bit hehehe


QUOTE(caarzee @ Oct 12 2011, 03:44 PM)
hi

I drive a Xtrail 2.0 2005 year AT car, NA with K&N drop in. I've been looking around to upgrade my exhaust. The stock setup is currently 4-1, cat, bullet, (looks like U-shape) muffler . I'm looking for a everyday city drive, therefore are looking at 4-2-1 setup. My usual AT drive, autogear changes on around 2.5k-3k rpm. at most, i'll hold it till 3.5k rpm but never passes that. my drive is always below 140kmph on highway, and city about 100kmph. I'm looking for torque-y at lower rev and for faster speed recovery without the sacrifice of FC. as the chinese thinking goes, better if can improve on FC along with the rpm powerband. current FC is about 7.6km/ltr or 13L/100km. ideally, I am looking at 11L/100km or 9km/ltr.

the car specs are as follows:

Displacement (cc): 1998
Arrangement and No. of cylinders: Inline 4-cylinder
Type of combustion chamber: Cross-flow, pentroof
Valve mechanism: Chain-drive DOHC with 4 valves/cylinder
Fuel system: Port injection
Bore x stroke (mm): 89.0 x 80.3
Compression ratio: 9.9:1
Valve head diameter (mm): Intake: 35.5; Exhaust: 30.5
Cylinder bore pitch (mm): 97.0
Crankshaft pin-journal diameter (mm): 45.0
Crankshaft main-journal diameter (mm): 55.0
Connecting rod length (mm): 152.9
BTDC: 26
ABDC: 30
BBDC: 29
ATDC: 3
(see http://www.4freeimagehost.com/uploads/fb412ebc1dee.png)

I had been reading some of the forum replies (of recent ones), and this is just based on my understanding,

1) I need a (2.0 cc * 2L =) 4L bullet volume?
2) stick with 1.6" diameter pipping and stock muffler (i think it's U-shape)?
3) i don't think i want to go for hotbits due to rumours of "cracks".
4) how do I go about calc the tuned length of extractor and collector, or length before the termination box ie bullet/midbox? Staying at 3500RPM, and I played around with the online calculators, it was recommended that I'll go with extractor header of 48" (15"+33"). Is this correct? I am still at loss how to go about getting the length of collector.
5) I'm leaning against taking out the cat, and if I don't, kind of defeat the whole purpose right?
6) what will be your recommendation for the whole setup?

thanks.
*
mine is close to luqmanz result, with BBDC of 29 degree, these are the results:

tuned rpm - 3000 , exhaust port length+header + downpipe length before bullet = 59"
tuned to engine max torque rpm 4000, total length of 44.5"

i suggest u do it shorter by 2" because this length includes the port length inside ur engine head as well

im not sure whether im getting this right but since u can hold maximum of 3.5k rpm then shift gear, probably best to tune it to run at around 3k so during upshifting, the rpm will drop to around 3k which is near to the tuned setup rpm so hopefully torque can be sustained longer across gears and rpm without having engine to push extra to climb back to tuned rpm everytime gear changes

but ur engine has 4k and 6k for max torque and max hp respectively so makes me wonder should u tune the exhaust to these rpm? haha but come to think about it, no matter how powerful the engine is, the power delivered to the wheel is still governed by the gearbox so 3k is probably a good start

if u are willing to further trial and error, get the longer 59" one first so in case u need more power at higher rpm, just cut it shorter to the next tuned rpm and place the bullet there. if u start shorter then later u will need to add more length in case u need torque at lower rpm, welds will be all over the downpipe area and does not look nice especially these parts are where power is being unleashed the most hehe

when u look for the 4-2-1, pay attention to the primary pipe size, i have read that good ratio for primary size to port size is around 1.15, i.e. if port diameter is 1.2" then best primary pipe will have around 1.4" in diameter but generally u will see bigger than this so get whichever close enough. also there should be at least 2" of straight line at each primary pipe on the header in line with ur exhaust port, if they are bended down straight away after the flange then its not really good in design. both these features improve anti-reversion of the header design to prevent exhaust gases going back to the chamber especially at idle and low rpm when gases are moving slow

pay attention to the merge collectors too, look inside for casting marks and merge quality. good header will have long and smooth merge at every collector i.e. at 4-2 merge and 2-1 merge collectors. smooth long collector improves the flow easeness and most importantly, although pressure wave reflection is weaker but the reflection duration will be lengthened due to the long merge and powerband is wider. short collector will have narrower powerband but in return pressure reflection will be much stronger, good for high rpm take off, not really for speed recovery in city drive

so, to sum up:
-4-2-1,
-1.6" stock pipe
-4L bullet/midbox or if u cant fit them under the car, 2.5L or 3L will also do the job if u are not going for 5k and above. 4L makes sure that the tuned length is kept until ur max engine rpm, if u dont go that high, lower than 4L still ok. but make sure u keep at least 0.5" diameter difference between bullet and downpipe. say if u use 1.6" downpipe, try get something like 2.5" bullet which has 0.9" difference. if u use 2" bullet, at one point im afraid the bullet will be considered as extension to the downpipe , the length will go out of tune so efficiency is lost there.
- im not sure the stock muffler is capable of flowing the gas ur engine expelling due to manufacturer noise regulation. they always compromise exhaust efficiency for a lot quiter sound and low cost in muffler design but stick to the stock first and see how the new upgrade does to u, let us know the result and we come up with another proposal for u biggrin.gif

sorry for long explaination but i just thought u deserve to know at least the essentials biggrin.gif


QUOTE(weeen11 @ Oct 12 2011, 05:29 PM)
Wanna ask some sifu here, which header is better for auto car??? 4-2-1 or 4-1? And also S-flow or Straight flow muffler better ?
*
depends on ur driving style and engine speed preference. 4-2-1 always good for torque sustain at high gear cruising and speed recovery from stopping and braking and 4-1 always good for low gear pickup and straight line acceleration to max rpm.

use sflow if u want cheap solution to noise issues and straight flow if u are after efficiency. power in straight flow setup is easier to predict, sflow can be hard to predict, sometimes u satisfied sometimes not. im always a fan of silent straight flow smile.gif

QUOTE(kokhing520 @ Oct 12 2011, 06:06 PM)
I want to ask ... Which distance is best for auto 1.0 from bullet tO the midbox and then to the tip?
*
best setup consists of either one midbox or one bullet only, if u need more than one to be satisfied, it simply means the piping is too big in diameter smile.gif

generally keep at least 30-45" of pipe between extractor and bullet but this is not entirely accurate. need to know engine spec and cam timing to know for sure

This post has been edited by upontheriversky: Oct 13 2011, 12:47 AM
kokhing520
post Oct 13 2011, 04:24 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: May 2011
From: KL



QUOTE(kokhing520 @ Oct 12 2011, 06:06 PM)
I want to ask ... Which distance is best for auto 1.0 from bullet tO the midbox and then to the tip?




best setup consists of either one midbox or one bullet only, if u need more than one to be satisfied, it simply means the piping is too big in diameter

generally keep at least 30-45" of pipe between extractor and bullet but this is not entirely accurate. need to know engine spec and cam timing to know for sure
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

currently my setup is..
- 3-1
- straight flow with modify bullet (to increase backpressure)
- big S-flow muffler
- piping 1.6"
low yat 82
post Oct 13 2011, 08:28 AM

time is nearing to end
*******
Senior Member
4,081 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


this 1 need confirm wit king amir lo.. if he really wanna do dyno, then wait for him lo... i lately burnt a hole in d pocket as well... somemore this end of month goin holiday at langkawi...lucky this month salary comes out at 2Xhb sweat.gif sweat.gif

ldhong
post Oct 13 2011, 09:59 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
620 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Subang Jaya


QUOTE(low yat 82 @ Oct 13 2011, 08:28 AM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


this 1 need confirm wit king amir lo.. if he really wanna do dyno, then wait for him lo... i lately burnt a hole in d pocket as well... somemore this end of month goin holiday at langkawi...lucky this month salary comes out at 2Xhb  sweat.gif  sweat.gif
*
I want dyno as well...Where is ur preference place for dyno????

GT-Auto ok??? brows.gif brows.gif brows.gif
caarzee
post Oct 13 2011, 11:36 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
QUOTE(upontheriversky @ Oct 12 2011, 09:42 PM)
mine is close to luqmanz result, with BBDC of 29 degree, these are the results:

tuned rpm - 3000 , exhaust port length+header + downpipe length before bullet = 59"
tuned to engine max torque rpm 4000, total length of 44.5"

i suggest u do it shorter by 2" because this length includes the port length inside ur engine head as well
it's a good start. thanks for providing the estimates for this.

QUOTE(upontheriversky @ Oct 12 2011, 09:42 PM)
im not sure whether im getting this right but since u can hold maximum of 3.5k rpm then shift gear, probably best to tune it to run at around 3k so during upshifting, the rpm will drop to around 3k which is near to the tuned setup rpm so hopefully torque can be sustained longer across gears and rpm without having engine to push extra to climb back to tuned rpm everytime gear changes

but ur engine has 4k and 6k for max torque and max hp respectively so makes me wonder should u tune the exhaust to these rpm? haha but come to think about it, no matter how powerful the engine is, the power delivered to the wheel is still governed by the gearbox so 3k is probably a good start
the same engine runs on sentra manual transmission models, and there are sporty versions of it (ie Spec V models but not available here). hence they're able to hold it at 6k rpm. mine is AT but I guess, if i wanted to hold it at 6k, i'll need to enable the overdrive button and keep my foot on the pedal and hope i dont hit anything along the way. haha. nonetheless, this is more of a family car, haha, I'm less incline to do so especially with our traffic here in KL/PJ.

QUOTE(upontheriversky @ Oct 12 2011, 09:42 PM)
if u are willing to further trial and error, get the longer 59" one first so in case u need more power at higher rpm, just cut it shorter to the next tuned rpm and place the bullet there. if u start shorter then later u will need to add more length in case u need torque at lower rpm, welds will be all over the downpipe area and does not look nice especially these parts are where power is being unleashed the most hehe
yea, agreed. i'll probably go with your suggestion smile.gif

QUOTE(upontheriversky @ Oct 12 2011, 09:42 PM)
when u look for the 4-2-1, pay attention to the primary pipe size, i have read that good ratio for primary size to port size is around 1.15, i.e. if port diameter is 1.2" then best primary pipe will have around 1.4" in diameter but generally u will see bigger than this so get whichever close enough. also there should be at least 2" of straight line at each primary pipe on the header in line with ur exhaust port, if they are bended down straight away after the flange then its not really good in design. both these features improve anti-reversion of the header design to prevent exhaust gases going back to the chamber especially at idle and low rpm when gases are moving slow
the 1.15" / 1.2" port diameter size that you're refering to is the engine manifold exhaust outlets, did I get this right? this then best fitted with 1.4" primary pipes (ie cyclinders), this will be the extractor head/header that goes to the engine manifold exhaust. is this correct? then it should be 2" in length horizontally on the primary before a curve bend downwards. hope i get this right. I read here that a good design, the diameters of the extractor to be slightly increased/decrease as it goes to the collector. a bad design is where the exhaust port and engine manifold port diameters the same.

QUOTE(upontheriversky @ Oct 12 2011, 09:42 PM)
pay attention to the merge collectors too, look inside for casting marks and merge quality. good header will have long and smooth merge at every collector i.e. at 4-2 merge and 2-1 merge collectors. smooth long collector improves the flow easeness and most importantly, although pressure wave reflection is weaker but the reflection duration will be lengthened due to the long merge and powerband is wider. short collector will have narrower powerband but in return pressure reflection will be much stronger, good for high rpm take off, not really for speed recovery in city drive
this is good stuff info! powerband means, the ability to expand/hold the torque?

QUOTE(upontheriversky @ Oct 12 2011, 09:42 PM)
so, to sum up:
-4-2-1,
-1.6" stock pipe
-4L bullet/midbox or if u cant fit them under the car, 2.5L or 3L will also do the job if u are not going for 5k and above. 4L makes sure that the tuned length is kept until ur max engine rpm, if u dont go that high, lower than 4L still ok. but make sure u keep at least 0.5" diameter difference between bullet and downpipe. say if u use 1.6" downpipe, try get something like 2.5" bullet which has 0.9" difference. if u use 2" bullet, at one point im afraid the bullet will be considered as extension to the downpipe , the length will go out of tune so efficiency is lost there.
- im not sure the stock muffler is capable of flowing the gas ur engine expelling due to manufacturer noise regulation. they always compromise exhaust efficiency for a lot quiter sound and low cost in muffler design but stick to the stock first and see how the new upgrade does to u, let us know the result and we come up with another proposal for u biggrin.gif
actually the 1.6" stock pipe is my own guessing. it could as well be a 2" pipe. as such, i'll need a bullet of 3" diameter. how do you go about calculating the bullet volume? say if it's 15" in length and has 3" diameter? I read earlier at one of your suggestions is to add some pipe of 3" length before and after the bullet if the bullet volume is insufficient. 4L is hard to find for a bullet. as one of the guys found out, the longest length for the bullet is 15". unsure.gif

will try with stock muffler first and if not that good, save some $$ and get a better one. some reviews of matola seems promising.

i've got to ask this, and this maybe silly noob question. why not use the cat convertor as termination box? what are the downside besides noise suppression? how about placing a catcon after the midbox bullet, although logically this is restrictive setup but it's better to have the cat before the midbox.

QUOTE(upontheriversky @ Oct 12 2011, 09:42 PM)
sorry for long explaination but i just thought u deserve to know at least the essentials biggrin.gif
hey, no need to be sorry. in fact, i should say thank you for taking time to put this together. i am quite happy with the lengthy notes. these explaination helps me to understand more. now i know why the collector's length is important because it also helps to create a vacuum for the gas to be pushed out as the BBDC cycle goes, types of collectors layouts, cylinder firing sequence and how it relates to the header non-sequential paring. before this, i know nuts about exhaust system! truly good stuff and it's science at work.

This post has been edited by caarzee: Oct 13 2011, 11:50 AM
upontheriversky
post Oct 13 2011, 12:10 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
12 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(kokhing520 @ Oct 13 2011, 04:24 AM)
QUOTE(kokhing520 @ Oct 12 2011, 06:06 PM)
I want to ask ... Which distance is best for auto 1.0 from bullet tO the midbox and then to the tip?
best setup consists of either one midbox or one bullet only, if u need more than one to be satisfied, it simply means the piping is too big in diameter

generally keep at least 30-45" of pipe between extractor and bullet but this is not entirely accurate. need to know engine spec and cam timing to know for sure
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

currently my setup is..
- 3-1
- straight flow with modify bullet (to increase backpressure)
- big S-flow muffler
- piping 1.6"
*
what engine is ur 1.0?

honestly 1.6" is too big, mine is kelisa and used to have 1.6" piping and sflow and it is not fast at all, pickup is fairly good but later on high gear felt like driving lorry, slow and no torque boost at higher rpm, FC becomes higher because i kept on pushing the car as it wont accelerate faster at high gear speed, it was worst than my stock piping, standard muffler with 3-1 extractor. i was very disappointed and that was when i start studying about all these exhaust stuff

it is a standard setup from every exhaust shop i went for 1.0, where they suggest 1.6" pipe and use sflow to increase backpressure from that 1.6" pipe

i have seen a kelisa 1.0 with stock 1.3"-1.4" piping, change extractor, straight bullet and straight flow muffler and the performance is really satisfying. the exhaust sounds fast and the feeling not like lorry at high gearing speed. definitely way faster than my last 1.6" and sflow setup

if u can have access to ur stock pipe again, i strongly suggest u get them back on, put straight bullet in the middle and custom a 1.5" straight flow muffler at supercircuit for rm350++. if budget does not allow, 2" straight flow is more readily available sometimes at cheaper price, but most importantly get smaller piping

trust me, u will gain much more power in ur driving at all rpm, guaranteed. 1.6" is superb on 1.3 myvi auto
luqmanz
post Oct 13 2011, 02:31 PM

Trading Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,185 posts

Joined: Oct 2005


QUOTE(upontheriversky @ Oct 13 2011, 12:10 PM)


if u can have access to ur stock pipe again, i strongly suggest u get them back on, put straight bullet in the middle and custom a 1.5" straight flow muffler at supercircuit for rm350++. if budget does not allow, 2" straight flow is more readily available sometimes at cheaper price, but most importantly get smaller piping

trust me, u will gain much more power in ur driving at all rpm, guaranteed. 1.6" is superb on 1.3 myvi auto
*

Let say .. exhaust open 30 BBDC intake open 30 BTDC
One question... what happen if we tune the length so that the wave arrives back at the exhaust port only 180 degree after its released ? (the same exhaust cycle)

Is this good or bad ?
kokhing520
post Oct 13 2011, 08:54 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: May 2011
From: KL



QUOTE(upontheriversky @ Oct 13 2011, 12:10 PM)
what engine is ur 1.0?

honestly 1.6" is too big, mine is kelisa and used to have 1.6" piping and sflow and it is not fast at all, pickup is fairly good but later on high gear felt like driving lorry, slow and no torque boost at higher rpm, FC becomes higher because i kept on pushing the car as it wont accelerate faster at high gear speed, it was worst than my stock piping, standard muffler with 3-1 extractor. i was very disappointed and that was when i start studying about all these exhaust stuff

it is a standard setup from every exhaust shop i went for 1.0, where they suggest 1.6" pipe and use sflow to increase backpressure from that 1.6" pipe

i have seen a kelisa 1.0 with stock 1.3"-1.4" piping, change extractor, straight bullet and straight flow muffler and the performance is really satisfying. the exhaust sounds fast and the feeling not like lorry at high gearing speed. definitely way faster than my last 1.6" and sflow setup

if u can have access to ur stock pipe again, i strongly suggest u get them back on, put straight bullet in the middle and custom a 1.5" straight flow muffler at supercircuit for rm350++. if budget does not allow, 2" straight flow is more readily available sometimes at cheaper price, but most importantly get smaller piping

trust me, u will gain much more power in ur driving at all rpm, guaranteed. 1.6" is superb on 1.3 myvi auto
*
Really appreciate on your explanation bro!! thumbup.gif
currently engine if not mistaken..should be EJ-VE..
so...wat is the size of the piping u recommanded?

luqmanz
post Oct 13 2011, 10:51 PM

Trading Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,185 posts

Joined: Oct 2005


QUOTE
actually the 1.6" stock pipe is my own guessing. it could as well be a 2" pipe. as such, i'll need a bullet of 3" diameter. how do you go about calculating the bullet volume? say if it's 15" in length and has 3" diameter? I read earlier at one of your suggestions is to add some pipe of 3" length before and after the bullet if the bullet volume is insufficient. 4L is hard to find for a bullet. as one of the guys found out, the longest length for the bullet is 15".  

will try with stock muffler first and if not that good, save some $$ and get a better one. some reviews of matola seems promising.


Just use the high-school math formula to calculate ........ Volume = PI x radius x radius x Length = PI x 1.5 x 1.5 x 15

QUOTE
i've got to ask this, and this maybe silly noob question. why not use the cat convertor as termination box? what are the downside besides noise suppression? how about placing a catcon after the midbox bullet, although logically this is restrictive setup but it's better to have the cat before the midbox.


A termination box is used to "fool" the pressure wave into thinking that the pipe has ended. So this TB needs to have a big volume to "mimick" atmosphere. Cat-con is just a narrow pipe with filters.
When it thinks the pipe has ended, the wave will later be reflected back to the exhaust port in an upside-down manner.


Added on October 13, 2011, 10:58 pmupontheriversky...

Did u notice that .. if u tune the exhaust at 4000 RPM ... you can also gain the same effect at 2000 RPM ... the same thing if you tuned for 6K RPM .. you can get the same effect at 3K RPM ... is this normal ?

This post has been edited by luqmanz: Oct 13 2011, 10:58 PM
caarzee
post Oct 14 2011, 09:52 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
QUOTE(upontheriversky @ Sep 29 2011, 09:54 PM)
2.6L can be equivalent of 3" diameter bullet having 22" length, the volume inside would give approx. 2.6L of air. u can use bullet/midbox if u got the space as long as after tuned downpipe, the piping change of area is significant and volume is close to 2.6L.
hi luqmanz,

pardon my ignorance, haha.

ok ok, i googled around. first get the vol jisim, and then convert it to litres smile.gif

so, to get 4L, with 3"diameter bullet, this translation that I need the length of 35.4" for a bullet shocking.gif haha.

( a ) therefore, if there is a length of 15" bullet, i'll need to join two bullets to make it 30" and adds two 3" length of 3"diameter pipes before and after these two bullets to make it somewhat total length of 36" (ie eq to 4L), or
( b ) should I go with one bullet of 15" length, and extend the pipping of 3" diameter after the bullet to make it 36" in total length (ie 4L), before it reaches the stock muffler, or
( c ) since I have a muffler (and it's not a straight flow), just leave it as one 15" bullet

what would be the logical and economical option?

and thanks for replying in the termination box smile.gif

thanks.

This post has been edited by caarzee: Oct 14 2011, 10:06 AM
[ r u g a ]
post Oct 15 2011, 12:58 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
662 posts

Joined: Aug 2005


QUOTE(caarzee @ Oct 14 2011, 10:52 AM)
hi luqmanz,

pardon my ignorance, haha.

ok ok, i googled around. first get the vol jisim, and then convert it to litres smile.gif

so, to get 4L, with 3"diameter bullet, this translation that I need the length of 35.4" for a bullet  shocking.gif  haha.

( a ) therefore, if there is a length of 15" bullet, i'll need to join two bullets to make it 30" and adds two 3" length of 3"diameter pipes before and after these two bullets to make it somewhat total length of 36" (ie eq to 4L), or
( b ) should I go with one bullet of 15" length, and extend the pipping of 3" diameter after the bullet to make it 36" in total length (ie 4L), before it reaches the stock muffler, or
( c ) since I have a muffler (and it's not a straight flow), just leave it as one 15" bullet

what would be the logical and economical option?

and thanks for replying in the termination box smile.gif

thanks.
*
hahaha,
this is what i am thinking too. the TB box is such a headache to make up the volume.
upontheriversky
post Oct 15 2011, 01:41 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
12 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(low yat 82 @ Oct 13 2011, 08:28 AM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


this 1 need confirm wit king amir lo.. if he really wanna do dyno, then wait for him lo... i lately burnt a hole in d pocket as well... somemore this end of month goin holiday at langkawi...lucky this month salary comes out at 2Xhb  sweat.gif  sweat.gif
*
ok anytime u guys wanna do around next month count me in, never been on dyno before rclxm9.gif


QUOTE(ldhong @ Oct 13 2011, 09:59 AM)
I want dyno as well...Where is ur preference place for dyno????

GT-Auto ok???  brows.gif  brows.gif  brows.gif
*
how much GT auto charging?

QUOTE(kokhing520 @ Oct 13 2011, 08:54 PM)
Really appreciate on your explanation bro!!  thumbup.gif
currently engine if not mistaken..should be EJ-VE..
so...wat is the size of the piping u recommanded?
*
if its ej-ve, get 1.5" piping since thats the smallest ive found so far, stock piping size is hard to find in kl area, i got a friend in penang says got 1.4" if u want to travel all the way there biggrin.gif


QUOTE(luqmanz @ Oct 13 2011, 10:51 PM)
Just use the high-school math formula to calculate ........  Volume = PI x radius x radius x Length = PI x 1.5 x 1.5 x 15
A termination box is used to "fool" the pressure wave into thinking that the pipe has ended. So this TB  needs to have a big volume to "mimick" atmosphere. Cat-con is just a narrow pipe with filters.
When it thinks the pipe has ended, the wave will later be reflected back to the exhaust port in an upside-down manner.
actually the cat-con can be used as termination box as it does expand the gas to a bigger volume, its just that the boost strength wont be as high as using a bigger volume termination box. i suspect honda use catcon as part of their exhaust tuning on their new models, some of my friends on new honda jazz complaints after changing to 4-2-1 extractor and losing power they used to have but got gain in higher end, i guess the power loss is due to removal of the catcon. the tuned exhaust must have been sync-ed with oem airfuel tuning so removing it tempers with oem air/fuel ratio as well

to play safe so that we wont temper the oem exhaust tuning if there is any, can use cherry bomb bullet to replace catcon, its still an expansion chamber only its free-er flowing of course than the cat

QUOTE

Added on October 13, 2011, 10:58 pmupontheriversky...

Did u notice that .. if u tune the exhaust at 4000 RPM ... you can also gain the same effect at 2000 RPM ... the same thing if you tuned for 6K RPM .. you can get the same effect at 3K RPM ... is this normal ?
*
yea, i always thought of that but i cant be sure for now, i have to do dyno on my car and study it. there is also one thing to consider, if it resonates at 4000rpm, there has to be some rpm where anti-resonation occurs in which we will have a torque dip so i guess best to consider all this when choosing rpm to tuned for


119 Pages « < 64 65 66 67 68 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0335sec    0.47    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 01:19 PM