Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Basic Intake and Exhaust Modification Guide, for normal aspirated cars v1.0

views
     
caarzee
post Oct 12 2011, 03:44 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
hi

I drive a Xtrail 2.0 2005 year AT car, NA with K&N drop in. I've been looking around to upgrade my exhaust. The stock setup is currently 4-1, cat, bullet, (looks like U-shape) muffler . I'm looking for a everyday city drive, therefore are looking at 4-2-1 setup. My usual AT drive, autogear changes on around 2.5k-3k rpm. at most, i'll hold it till 3.5k rpm but never passes that. my drive is always below 140kmph on highway, and city about 100kmph. I'm looking for torque-y at lower rev and for faster speed recovery without the sacrifice of FC. as the chinese thinking goes, better if can improve on FC along with the rpm powerband. current FC is about 7.6km/ltr or 13L/100km. ideally, I am looking at 11L/100km or 9km/ltr.

the car specs are as follows:

Displacement (cc): 1998
Arrangement and No. of cylinders: Inline 4-cylinder
Type of combustion chamber: Cross-flow, pentroof
Valve mechanism: Chain-drive DOHC with 4 valves/cylinder
Fuel system: Port injection
Bore x stroke (mm): 89.0 x 80.3
Compression ratio: 9.9:1
Valve head diameter (mm): Intake: 35.5; Exhaust: 30.5
Cylinder bore pitch (mm): 97.0
Crankshaft pin-journal diameter (mm): 45.0
Crankshaft main-journal diameter (mm): 55.0
Connecting rod length (mm): 152.9
BTDC: 26
ABDC: 30
BBDC: 29
ATDC: 3
(see http://www.4freeimagehost.com/uploads/fb412ebc1dee.png)

I had been reading some of the forum replies (of recent ones), and this is just based on my understanding,

1) I need a (2.0 cc * 2L =) 4L bullet volume?
2) stick with 1.6" diameter pipping and stock muffler (i think it's U-shape)?
3) i don't think i want to go for hotbits due to rumours of "cracks".
4) how do I go about calc the tuned length of extractor and collector, or length before the termination box ie bullet/midbox? Staying at 3500RPM, and I played around with the online calculators, it was recommended that I'll go with extractor header of 48" (15"+33"). Is this correct? I am still at loss how to go about getting the length of collector.
5) I'm leaning against taking out the cat, and if I don't, kind of defeat the whole purpose right?
6) what will be your recommendation for the whole setup?

thanks.
caarzee
post Oct 12 2011, 04:34 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
hi luqmanz,

140hp (103kW) at 6000rpm. I think the cutoff is around 6.5k rpm. never tried these though smile.gif

not sure if stock muffler is a straight flow. currently stock exhaust setup is as such
user posted image

I measured the length from header outlet (6.exhaust front tube) to bullet (10.exhaust center tube) is about 55".

As such, I just need to get
1) 4-2-1 extractor
2) get new pipping from exhaust outlet to bullet at 44" lenght
2) remove cat
3) get a 4L bullet
4) stay with stock muffler

did i get this right?

thanks.

This post has been edited by caarzee: Oct 12 2011, 04:45 PM
caarzee
post Oct 13 2011, 11:36 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
QUOTE(upontheriversky @ Oct 12 2011, 09:42 PM)
mine is close to luqmanz result, with BBDC of 29 degree, these are the results:

tuned rpm - 3000 , exhaust port length+header + downpipe length before bullet = 59"
tuned to engine max torque rpm 4000, total length of 44.5"

i suggest u do it shorter by 2" because this length includes the port length inside ur engine head as well
it's a good start. thanks for providing the estimates for this.

QUOTE(upontheriversky @ Oct 12 2011, 09:42 PM)
im not sure whether im getting this right but since u can hold maximum of 3.5k rpm then shift gear, probably best to tune it to run at around 3k so during upshifting, the rpm will drop to around 3k which is near to the tuned setup rpm so hopefully torque can be sustained longer across gears and rpm without having engine to push extra to climb back to tuned rpm everytime gear changes

but ur engine has 4k and 6k for max torque and max hp respectively so makes me wonder should u tune the exhaust to these rpm? haha but come to think about it, no matter how powerful the engine is, the power delivered to the wheel is still governed by the gearbox so 3k is probably a good start
the same engine runs on sentra manual transmission models, and there are sporty versions of it (ie Spec V models but not available here). hence they're able to hold it at 6k rpm. mine is AT but I guess, if i wanted to hold it at 6k, i'll need to enable the overdrive button and keep my foot on the pedal and hope i dont hit anything along the way. haha. nonetheless, this is more of a family car, haha, I'm less incline to do so especially with our traffic here in KL/PJ.

QUOTE(upontheriversky @ Oct 12 2011, 09:42 PM)
if u are willing to further trial and error, get the longer 59" one first so in case u need more power at higher rpm, just cut it shorter to the next tuned rpm and place the bullet there. if u start shorter then later u will need to add more length in case u need torque at lower rpm, welds will be all over the downpipe area and does not look nice especially these parts are where power is being unleashed the most hehe
yea, agreed. i'll probably go with your suggestion smile.gif

QUOTE(upontheriversky @ Oct 12 2011, 09:42 PM)
when u look for the 4-2-1, pay attention to the primary pipe size, i have read that good ratio for primary size to port size is around 1.15, i.e. if port diameter is 1.2" then best primary pipe will have around 1.4" in diameter but generally u will see bigger than this so get whichever close enough. also there should be at least 2" of straight line at each primary pipe on the header in line with ur exhaust port, if they are bended down straight away after the flange then its not really good in design. both these features improve anti-reversion of the header design to prevent exhaust gases going back to the chamber especially at idle and low rpm when gases are moving slow
the 1.15" / 1.2" port diameter size that you're refering to is the engine manifold exhaust outlets, did I get this right? this then best fitted with 1.4" primary pipes (ie cyclinders), this will be the extractor head/header that goes to the engine manifold exhaust. is this correct? then it should be 2" in length horizontally on the primary before a curve bend downwards. hope i get this right. I read here that a good design, the diameters of the extractor to be slightly increased/decrease as it goes to the collector. a bad design is where the exhaust port and engine manifold port diameters the same.

QUOTE(upontheriversky @ Oct 12 2011, 09:42 PM)
pay attention to the merge collectors too, look inside for casting marks and merge quality. good header will have long and smooth merge at every collector i.e. at 4-2 merge and 2-1 merge collectors. smooth long collector improves the flow easeness and most importantly, although pressure wave reflection is weaker but the reflection duration will be lengthened due to the long merge and powerband is wider. short collector will have narrower powerband but in return pressure reflection will be much stronger, good for high rpm take off, not really for speed recovery in city drive
this is good stuff info! powerband means, the ability to expand/hold the torque?

QUOTE(upontheriversky @ Oct 12 2011, 09:42 PM)
so, to sum up:
-4-2-1,
-1.6" stock pipe
-4L bullet/midbox or if u cant fit them under the car, 2.5L or 3L will also do the job if u are not going for 5k and above. 4L makes sure that the tuned length is kept until ur max engine rpm, if u dont go that high, lower than 4L still ok. but make sure u keep at least 0.5" diameter difference between bullet and downpipe. say if u use 1.6" downpipe, try get something like 2.5" bullet which has 0.9" difference. if u use 2" bullet, at one point im afraid the bullet will be considered as extension to the downpipe , the length will go out of tune so efficiency is lost there.
- im not sure the stock muffler is capable of flowing the gas ur engine expelling due to manufacturer noise regulation. they always compromise exhaust efficiency for a lot quiter sound and low cost in muffler design but stick to the stock first and see how the new upgrade does to u, let us know the result and we come up with another proposal for u biggrin.gif
actually the 1.6" stock pipe is my own guessing. it could as well be a 2" pipe. as such, i'll need a bullet of 3" diameter. how do you go about calculating the bullet volume? say if it's 15" in length and has 3" diameter? I read earlier at one of your suggestions is to add some pipe of 3" length before and after the bullet if the bullet volume is insufficient. 4L is hard to find for a bullet. as one of the guys found out, the longest length for the bullet is 15". unsure.gif

will try with stock muffler first and if not that good, save some $$ and get a better one. some reviews of matola seems promising.

i've got to ask this, and this maybe silly noob question. why not use the cat convertor as termination box? what are the downside besides noise suppression? how about placing a catcon after the midbox bullet, although logically this is restrictive setup but it's better to have the cat before the midbox.

QUOTE(upontheriversky @ Oct 12 2011, 09:42 PM)
sorry for long explaination but i just thought u deserve to know at least the essentials biggrin.gif
hey, no need to be sorry. in fact, i should say thank you for taking time to put this together. i am quite happy with the lengthy notes. these explaination helps me to understand more. now i know why the collector's length is important because it also helps to create a vacuum for the gas to be pushed out as the BBDC cycle goes, types of collectors layouts, cylinder firing sequence and how it relates to the header non-sequential paring. before this, i know nuts about exhaust system! truly good stuff and it's science at work.

This post has been edited by caarzee: Oct 13 2011, 11:50 AM
caarzee
post Oct 14 2011, 09:52 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
QUOTE(upontheriversky @ Sep 29 2011, 09:54 PM)
2.6L can be equivalent of 3" diameter bullet having 22" length, the volume inside would give approx. 2.6L of air. u can use bullet/midbox if u got the space as long as after tuned downpipe, the piping change of area is significant and volume is close to 2.6L.
hi luqmanz,

pardon my ignorance, haha.

ok ok, i googled around. first get the vol jisim, and then convert it to litres smile.gif

so, to get 4L, with 3"diameter bullet, this translation that I need the length of 35.4" for a bullet shocking.gif haha.

( a ) therefore, if there is a length of 15" bullet, i'll need to join two bullets to make it 30" and adds two 3" length of 3"diameter pipes before and after these two bullets to make it somewhat total length of 36" (ie eq to 4L), or
( b ) should I go with one bullet of 15" length, and extend the pipping of 3" diameter after the bullet to make it 36" in total length (ie 4L), before it reaches the stock muffler, or
( c ) since I have a muffler (and it's not a straight flow), just leave it as one 15" bullet

what would be the logical and economical option?

and thanks for replying in the termination box smile.gif

thanks.

This post has been edited by caarzee: Oct 14 2011, 10:06 AM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0502sec    1.24    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 07:46 AM