Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

119 Pages « < 62 63 64 65 66 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Basic Intake and Exhaust Modification Guide, for normal aspirated cars v1.0

views
     
Ridt_Henshin
post Oct 8 2011, 07:46 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
380 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


hi , i own a peugeot 206 1.6 16v AUTOMATIC transmission

current mod is

1)4-2-1 extractor (custom by JFA)
2) k & n drop in filter
3)topcat muffler s flow, piping 1.6 mid and 1.6 end ( all done at everco)

recently done decarbo as mileage is 90K ++ . after all this i fell really minor improvement. response only better. about performance... still cant really tell. top speed still same..after 150km/h going to 160 170 180 190 takes a while..especially past 170... top speed now is at 180, 190 after a waiting for a while. was looking to get to the 200 area...

im thinking of getting k & n typhoon from my friend. (now using 2.0gti)
he has dyno charts proven that the combination of this typhoon and extractor has impressive gains.

what are you opinions? will it work well? compared to my drop in.




my dyno chart by jc racing on wheel is 85.01 and 13.12 torque. torque comes around 2k plus. 0-100 is decent i guess for an automatic..

dyno chart is before k & n typhoon. and my next step is

1) denso iridium plugs IKH20
2) k & n typhoon
3) unichip q

anything u guys can recommend besides this? as im gonna unichip last. and im not sure i post in right section. if wrong please move tq

*camshaft and polish is too expensive n not worth it for auto gearbox. anything else ?*

This post has been edited by Ridt_Henshin: Oct 8 2011, 07:53 PM
iAme
post Oct 8 2011, 11:00 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
72 posts

Joined: May 2010
From: Johore
QUOTE(vr2turbo @ Oct 3 2011, 04:38 PM)
Still on original cast iron header with turbine from 4G63.... smile.gif
*
wow, valy nais notworthy.gif
luqmanz
post Oct 9 2011, 02:06 AM

Trading Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,185 posts

Joined: Oct 2005


QUOTE(upontheriversky @ Oct 7 2011, 12:14 PM)
using pressure wave speed as 1650 feet/s, i calculated header + downpipe length of 47.3".

if u know the needed runner length and diameter and the plenum volume needed to fit ur application best then can custom manifold, on the intake pipe side im not so sure how to apply pressure wave tuning to complement manifold and exhaust ones, need more time digging out hidden info on the net hehe

but u can refer to this article, he dyno-ed different open pod pipe length to see how length affects the powerband of the engine, and it seems that long pipe wins over short ram hands down:

http://autospeed.com/cms/title_Pipe-Dreams...49/article.html

i think k3ve2 cam profile is quite aggressive already for daily drive, overlap of 54, intake duration 260, exhaust duration 227, almost have trait of mild performance cam d, no need to reprofile unless higher power is needed
*
I just read the article that says longer ram-pipe equal to faster power generation .. the article says nothing about tuning the length (exhaust style) .. however I think the gain there is because of the speed of air-intake .. air in longer pipe flow faster than air in short pipe ...

I suspect the result could have been better with a properly tuned length..but wonder if this is even possible LOL ...

This post has been edited by luqmanz: Oct 9 2011, 02:12 AM
upontheriversky
post Oct 10 2011, 06:23 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
12 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(Ridt_Henshin @ Oct 8 2011, 07:46 PM)
hi , i own a peugeot 206 1.6 16v AUTOMATIC transmission

current mod is

1)4-2-1 extractor (custom by JFA)
2) k & n drop in filter
3)topcat muffler s flow, piping 1.6 mid and 1.6 end ( all done at everco)

recently done decarbo as mileage is 90K ++ . after all this i fell really minor improvement. response only better. about performance... still cant really tell. top speed still same..after 150km/h going to 160 170 180 190 takes a while..especially past 170... top speed now is at 180, 190 after a waiting for a while. was looking to get to the 200 area...

im thinking of getting k & n typhoon from my friend. (now using 2.0gti)
he has dyno charts proven that the combination of this typhoon and extractor has impressive gains.

what are you opinions? will it work well? compared to my drop in.
my dyno chart by jc racing on wheel is 85.01 and 13.12 torque. torque comes around 2k plus. 0-100 is decent i guess for an automatic..

dyno chart is before k & n typhoon. and my next step is

1) denso iridium plugs IKH20
2) k & n typhoon
3) unichip q

anything u guys can recommend besides this? as im gonna unichip last. and im not sure i post in right section. if wrong please move tq

*camshaft and polish is too expensive n not worth it for auto gearbox. anything else ?*
*
i'll sum up my point of view to help u choose better

IMO, the pipe size is good enough for an auto so what u can do is swap that s-flow muffler to 1.6" big body straight flow muffler, dont use bullet style muffler as the noise could be unbearable, big body muffles a lot better. Also dont get 2" straight flow because its not efficient, people might say its ok but i dont think it is coz 1.6" expand to 2" will slow the exhaust down by a lot and cause turbulence thus backpressure, this disadvantage is more obvious at higher rpm / higher speed when everything in engine is moving really fast where 1% difference could be felt

also its good to know the primary pipe size and length of ur custom header so u could get the exhaust port / primary size ratio. most aftermarket header here will give u racing spec primary pipe size which does not work below 3k

before u decide on getting typhoon, compare the internal volume of typhoon intake and ur airbox, the one having most litres are the winner for ur auto and presumably a daily car, because more litres mean u'll have plenty of air reservoir stored for better take-off acceleration so if in any case the header lowers the low end torque, u got airbox to counter balance and boost it up, powerband is flatter and wider, not peaky and narrow

i have studied extensively enough to say that if the airbox design has a substantial restriction in the first place, no aftermarket drop in can help u gain noticeable power gain. basically decreasing airbox intake restriction will give a gain of approx. square root of pressure difference, in other word, decreasing intake restriction by 50% (making pressure difference bigger) will give u gain of 6-8% ponies.

Enlarge the snorkel pipe and airbox inlet if u feel there is a choke at higher rpm. typhoon might work on ur friend's car but does not mean it will work on yours. compare the rpm powerband between ur engine and his gti. usually high rev engines will benefit a lot more from open-pod style than low rev engines. open pod style on bigger engines will have more benefit than smaller engines because bigger engine has bigger torque to begin with so any low range power drop will not be as sufferable as small engine on open pod

i personally think using more expensive spark plug does not give u any noticeable gain in power except it will last longer for easier maintenance. Peugeot and all manufacturers must have "superior fuel efficiency" to meet the marketing target so i dont think they will cut a slack on combustion efficiency. Unlike exhaust and intake where noise regulation applies that engine efficiency has to be compromised. So the stock plug must have enough characteristics to give complete combustion on stock engine, anything more is not necessary unless u do something to the engine i.e. increasing the cc or something. Using expensive and higher quality engine oil will definitely increase hp and torque but not on the plug so no point using expensive plug if power is what u after.

no comment on unichip coz i havent got the chance to enter air fuel tuning world yet smile.gif but an advice from old timers ive got is always try to get the best tuner to do it and saves cost and more worth it. dont cut budget on finding pro tuner.

QUOTE(luqmanz @ Oct 9 2011, 02:06 AM)
I just read the article that says longer ram-pipe equal to faster power generation .. the article says nothing about tuning the length (exhaust style) .. however I think the gain there is because of the speed of air-intake .. air  in longer pipe flow faster  than air in short pipe ...

I suspect the result could have been better with a properly tuned length..but wonder if this is even possible LOL ...
*
he didnt do the exact calculation but when different pipe length was dyno tested, i reckon it is safe to conclude from the article that the length achieving highest hp is probably closest to the tuned length intake for that engine.

proof is he tested up to 100cm intake pipe length but 60cm pipe length wins the dyno so there has to be a reason why 60cm wins despite air travelling in 100cm pipe should be faster.

what we need to do is to find out how that length is derived with maths equation and generalise it to apply to all engines - reverse engineering smile.gif

This post has been edited by upontheriversky: Oct 10 2011, 06:25 PM
luqmanz
post Oct 10 2011, 06:49 PM

Trading Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,185 posts

Joined: Oct 2005


QUOTE(upontheriversky @ Oct 10 2011, 06:23 PM)


proof is he tested up to 100cm intake pipe length but 60cm pipe length wins the dyno so there has to be a reason why 60cm wins despite air travelling in 100cm pipe should be faster.

what we need to do is to find out how that length is derived with maths equation and generalise it to apply to all engines - reverse engineering smile.gif
*
Yup exactly ... lets do the reverse engineering ... I wonder from where should we measure the length ... open pod intake tuning sounds like a cheap upgrade ...


Do you think a long pipe open pod should give better low-rpm torque ? I think the air in long pipe should work much like the air in the airbox.

This post has been edited by luqmanz: Oct 10 2011, 06:54 PM
amir_tengkorak
post Oct 10 2011, 07:31 PM

Wow..Amazing...
******
Senior Member
1,347 posts

Joined: May 2009
From: From: From: From:


Hai guys.i'm new in this lowyat forum.

Currently driving satria 1.3 carburetor.
My current exhaust setup is
1)Zenden 4-2-1 Extractor
2)2 inch nenas/flexi pipe
3)1.7 inch piping with 2 inch mid bullet
4)2 inch straight flow muffler

Previously i was using stock nenas/flexi which is the size is around 1.5 or 1.6 inch..
I've decided to change to bigger nenas because i scared of bottleneck in my exhaust system..
After changed to 2 inch nenas/flexi,low end tarak power already..
Should i stick with it,change to 1.7 inch nenas,or change back to stock nenas?

Thanks for reading yo.
low yat 82
post Oct 10 2011, 07:43 PM

time is nearing to end
*******
Senior Member
4,081 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



QUOTE(amir_tengkorak @ Oct 10 2011, 07:31 PM)
Hai guys.i'm new in this lowyat forum.

Currently driving satria 1.3 carburetor.
My current exhaust setup is
1)Zenden 4-2-1 Extractor
2)2 inch nenas/flexi pipe
3)1.7 inch piping with 2 inch mid bullet
4)2 inch straight flow muffler

Previously i was using stock nenas/flexi which is the size is around 1.5 or 1.6 inch..
I've decided to change to bigger nenas because i scared of bottleneck in my exhaust system..
After changed to 2 inch nenas/flexi,low end tarak power already..
Should i stick with it,change to 1.7 inch nenas,or change back to stock nenas?

Thanks for reading yo.
*
wahahah!! king amir also come here~~

prepare kena mind twistin theory la...lol!

lol... i till noe no dare sentuh pipe diameter coz scare my low end disturbed...zzz
samwongjyhhorng
post Oct 10 2011, 07:55 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
10 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


my car was use 4-2-1,12inch bullet and midbox,then is s flow muffler..plan to take out the bullet and use midbox onli,is it will affect the performance?my car is persona auto..the pipe diameter still remain stock..is it i need to change to more larger or more smaller diameter?
amir_tengkorak
post Oct 10 2011, 07:55 PM

Wow..Amazing...
******
Senior Member
1,347 posts

Joined: May 2009
From: From: From: From:


QUOTE(low yat 82 @ Oct 10 2011, 07:43 PM)
wahahah!! king amir also come here~~

prepare kena mind twistin theory la...lol!

lol... i till noe no dare sentuh pipe diameter coz scare my low end disturbed...zzz
*
dei..apa king laaaa..
actually,its just slightly low end power lost..
and the good side is,when the torque kicks in,fuh..
gear 3 macam nak terbang siot.. sweat.gif
low yat 82
post Oct 10 2011, 08:46 PM

time is nearing to end
*******
Senior Member
4,081 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



QUOTE(amir_tengkorak @ Oct 10 2011, 07:55 PM)
dei..apa king laaaa..
actually,its just slightly low end power lost..
and the good side is,when the torque kicks in,fuh..
gear 3 macam nak terbang siot..  sweat.gif
*
ooo...good for u la.. i cannot.. everyday drive town. low end must take care.. icon_question.gif icon_question.gif
upontheriversky
post Oct 10 2011, 10:09 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
12 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(low yat 82 @ Oct 10 2011, 08:46 PM)
ooo...good for u la.. i cannot.. everyday drive town. low end must take care.. icon_question.gif  icon_question.gif
*
same for me also.. if low end lost i couldn sleep at night hahaha
Ridt_Henshin
post Oct 10 2011, 11:03 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
380 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


QUOTE(upontheriversky @ Oct 10 2011, 10:09 PM)
same for me also.. if low end lost i couldn sleep at night hahaha
*
but then bila at highway no funn sad.gif cnt feel the pull.. especially when holding gears
amir_tengkorak
post Oct 11 2011, 12:30 AM

Wow..Amazing...
******
Senior Member
1,347 posts

Joined: May 2009
From: From: From: From:


wei tauke 5770,come la test my car first..tak try tak tau maaa..sudah try hari hari mau maaa.. laugh.gif
upontheriversky
post Oct 11 2011, 04:16 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
12 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(Ridt_Henshin @ Oct 10 2011, 11:03 PM)
but then bila at highway no funn sad.gif cnt feel the pull.. especially when holding gears
*
true also, i couldn get the take-off rush speeding after paying toll as fast as when i was on bigger pipe anymore haha but top speed sustain is much superior with smaller pipe, just need to open throttle gradually instead of floor it down right from beginning. i had problem sutaining power at high gear speed with bigger pipe
Ridt_Henshin
post Oct 11 2011, 09:01 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
380 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


QUOTE(upontheriversky @ Oct 11 2011, 04:16 AM)
true also, i couldn get the take-off rush speeding after paying toll as fast as when i was on bigger pipe anymore haha but top speed sustain is much superior with smaller pipe, just need to open throttle gradually instead of floor it down right from beginning. i had problem sutaining power at high gear speed with bigger pipe
*
right now my pickup is really great when i floor the pedal...but i seem to be loosing out on mid.. m reading to ure posts bro. very informative.. hehe just wish we cn get on both worlds.. smile.gif

p/s

jst found below layer to protect car frm water. and gonna get my k and n typhoon this week.hopefull i will se noticeable gains with my current setup ... and i just installed denso iridium today
low yat 82
post Oct 11 2011, 09:09 AM

time is nearing to end
*******
Senior Member
4,081 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



QUOTE(upontheriversky @ Oct 10 2011, 10:09 PM)
same for me also.. if low end lost i couldn sleep at night hahaha
*
haha!

QUOTE(amir_tengkorak @ Oct 11 2011, 12:30 AM)
wei tauke 5770,come la test my car first..tak try tak tau maaa..sudah try hari hari mau maaa.. laugh.gif
*
haha! kanasai la u. dun poison me la. =.=!

QUOTE(upontheriversky @ Oct 11 2011, 04:16 AM)
true also, i couldn get the take-off rush speeding after paying toll as fast as when i was on bigger pipe anymore haha but top speed sustain is much superior with smaller pipe, just need to open throttle gradually instead of floor it down right from beginning. i had problem sutaining power at high gear speed with bigger pipe
*
how it happen cant sustain power at high speed gear wit bigger pipe?


Ridt_Henshin
post Oct 11 2011, 09:10 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
380 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


QUOTE(amir_tengkorak @ Oct 10 2011, 07:55 PM)
dei..apa king laaaa..
actually,its just slightly low end power lost..
and the good side is,when the torque kicks in,fuh..
gear 3 macam nak terbang siot..  sweat.gif
*
what car bro?sound cool rclxms.gif

This post has been edited by Ridt_Henshin: Oct 11 2011, 09:10 AM
amir_tengkorak
post Oct 11 2011, 10:21 AM

Wow..Amazing...
******
Senior Member
1,347 posts

Joined: May 2009
From: From: From: From:


QUOTE(low yat 82 @ Oct 11 2011, 09:09 AM)
haha! kanasai la u. dun poison me la. =.=!
*
Dei..mana ada poison..i mau hilangkan u mia curious je..hehehehehe

QUOTE(Ridt_Henshin @ Oct 11 2011, 09:10 AM)
what car bro?sound cool  rclxms.gif
*
Old satria 1.3 carburetor only..small ciku slow car.. sweat.gif
Ridt_Henshin
post Oct 11 2011, 12:54 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
380 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


QUOTE(amir_tengkorak @ Oct 11 2011, 10:21 AM)
Dei..mana ada poison..i mau hilangkan u mia curious je..hehehehehe
Old satria 1.3 carburetor only..small ciku slow car.. sweat.gif
*
but body is light. hehe . take me for a ride cn? smile.gif u guys dont do TT? wish to mix with other car users hehe
amir_tengkorak
post Oct 11 2011, 04:46 PM

Wow..Amazing...
******
Senior Member
1,347 posts

Joined: May 2009
From: From: From: From:


QUOTE(Ridt_Henshin @ Oct 11 2011, 12:54 PM)
but body is light. hehe . take me for a ride cn? smile.gif u guys dont do TT? wish to mix with other car users hehe
*
Can..but my car slow ler..if got any TT i'll inform u.

OR,

U guys want to TT?
Basic Intake and Exhaust Modification TT.
Can hear lots of mufflers.. brows.gif


119 Pages « < 62 63 64 65 66 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0331sec    0.79    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 12:19 PM