QUOTE(David83 @ Jun 27 2013, 08:14 PM)
I based my statement on Pub-Mut Bhd own report i.e. Rtn & Volatility Measures for Public Mutual Funds for 3 years period ended 31/3/2013 which is a report only accessible to its own agents.
Agents who are worth their salt should regularly assess it (through UTC Connect) and make scientific calculation so that to benefit clients.
Sadly, many do not and we end up agents advising all sort of nonsense to the mass market such as asking client to buy shitty funds like PSF.
OK, lets get back to business:
PSF avr rtn for the past 3 years is 6.01% p.a. Its benchmark i.e. FBM KLCI is 8.16% p.a.
PSF 3 year average std-dev is 10.0% and FBM KLCI's 3 year average std-dev is 10.3%
PSF perform below its benchmark and it is just as risky as investing into KLCI. Why should we pay 5.5% service charge and 1.5% annual management fee to the stupid fund managers to perform even worse than its benchmark?
The above is my reason to say PSF is a bad, bad bad fund David.
Xuzen