I tot nukilan 3 bumi units still hv plenty?

Means kena con lo

mislead me into believing i am paying about same PSF as earlier pentas phases... argh..

is there any way to know what type of measurement they use? for example, i would like to compare sf in setia alam vs in alam impian..

I measured before (use equipment)
10 m - 25 m

Oh Hello.

Let say my budget is OK, should i go get it for specifically investment?

Yeah sure.

Is that considered high or low? i am geology idiot. How about pentas.. i think even if it's 10-25m also should be relatively safe as it is far away from the river and there's water retention pond next to P1?


seems like UFO done a lot of technical research.

50m-60m is the best I think, unfortunately most AI can't reach that except the Bungalow area
Pentas is fr 24m - 32 m

This post has been edited by UFO-ET: Apr 12 2013, 05:02 PM

Pentas 3 inner build up I suspect smaller than P1/P2. Main reason they have car porch >20ft. P1/P2 car porch ~19-20ft. Back yard same ~5ft. If discounted P1 beside staircase void area only deduct 80sqft (16x5).

1) Front 4ft = 4x25x2 storey = 200sqft.
2) P3 not likely larger than P1/P2 with shorter length b/u. not to mentioned P3 claimed larger 100 to 300 sqft compare to P1.

Perhaps new metric use when they launched P3 at later date. Which I believe most developer nowadays use the same metric to include all area. They boost up the size to compete with cheaper per sqft price.

We can't say that kena con. Just we didnt check properly and brochure never stated IMS or AMS. Usually, highrise property, bungalows & semi-D prefer use IMS. Brochure will explain land of size and inner built-up different.

Usually P1-P3 are same AMS. Compare P3 have two different type A1 and A2.
A1 inner 59.4feet x 25feet, and A2 inner 54.4feet x 25feet. Meanwhile, A1 from living to kitchen longer abit 5feets. But I confused where another 500sqft, that declared with 3499sqft?

Seems, would need specialist QS or consultant to check. Or architect drawing can help us to verify on actual sized.

Build up area calculation for P3 by i&p is dubious to me

Sometimes i also ask myself. Where have the sqft gone to? I got a house which is 3200 sqft. Really feel similar size with my P1 3600 sqft

This post has been edited by AMINT: Apr 12 2013, 08:29 PM

Nadayu? 2700sf?

Nope. Subang jaya. Nadayu is 2637 sqft. Nadayu i dare not comment yet coz it was from somebody else's eyes. He said same feeling also. Lets see. Oh ya, can we have a meeting on 26th april 2013? Night time? Wanna see u guys.

This post has been edited by AMINT: Apr 12 2013, 09:12 PM

IMS or AMS...also buyer already bought liao......no point argue on this part....most important now is Fencing & Guarded.....

Anyone ?....latest update from InP.....?

Agree with you.

But I think most of the developers now measure using the first AMS you mentioned, including car porch area where covered by ceiling only, and upper floor's balcony size.

As I had asked, SP Setia did so, Sime Darby did so, Gamuda Land did for the Armaya 1-3 ( unsure others ), Mah Sing did for M Residence 1 and 2 ( not sure for others like Kinrara Residence ) ...

I think I&P did so bcz the car porch ceiling is not small, that's what I feel the large built up size came / increased from, same goes to BK side of Sapphire and Emerald's 22x75 ...

Latest update from I&P: GM will present to board on our behalf to talk about fence,proper guardhouse and boom in may 2013.

Why suddenly the change ya bro? Thats why i got confused too. I was eiii, sure or not the sqft. But if that is the new guideline, then what to do. I am more concern of f&g now

It doesn't matter whether AMS o IMS, what is important is consistency. If inp adopt IMS for P1+P2 technically they should oso adopt IMS for P3, not AMS. Otherwise you are comparing apple with orange and this can be very deceiving. Perhaps they engage diff architect for P3 and that explains the differences.

Cayalah bro Chairman!