QUOTE(peri peri @ Nov 29 2012, 02:48 PM)
Bro,
There are always Speculation and current market value.
Im not sure how valuer did their valuation.
If to value a prop from rm100k to rm150k, justifiable
If to value a prop from rm100k to rm500k, how rationale is that? Bank mgt ask the valuer wats the main factor for that, valuer replied because similar property also transact at rm500k. will the bank mgt approved?
Maybe u can share with me how the valuer report substantiated to their proposed prop value?
Says for a case, the developer purposely overprice their props, then pakat with panel bank for max loan. Some rich dude BBB becoz of its brand. After complete, subsale, new finance bank will still value above the overpriced sub sale prop? There are a lot incident like this happened. Its happen in Prime prop like those facing KLCC, speculation too high, bank hard to commit high loan, end up a lot vacant unsold unit.
just my 2cents.
Hi Peri Gor,
Yea, you are right, I am not a valuer but did engaged a valuer to value a subsale property for loan purposes. One of the way they valuer do is refer to latest few transacted properties selling price within the same area & finally they derived their own valuation basis. Normally the value given would not run to far from that latest transacted price.
For WOTP, only block C has such issue right? say after 3 yrs after VP, other blocks are selling at the range of RM500k, so wouldn;t this be a indicative value for block C too? I know the block C original selling price is RM100 that is not the issue, it would be incorrect to produce a valuation report that block C is worth much lesser than other block right?
Bank of course are not stupid, that is why they will lend to the buyers based on the reasonable market value.
i believe the question here lies as to : What is the value to be reported based on the valuation report
If valuation report shows current market value, no problem for subsequent buyer to borrow.

Just my 20 sen
cheers all bro