-deleted-
since i also blur of the question.
This post has been edited by Agito666: Jan 30 2012, 03:50 PM
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.14, Nikon D4 $6000 only
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.14, Nikon D4 $6000 only
|
|
Jan 30 2012, 03:49 PM
|
|
Elite
11,861 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Bangalasia |
-deleted-
since i also blur of the question. This post has been edited by Agito666: Jan 30 2012, 03:50 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 30 2012, 03:59 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
141 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE(celciuz @ Jan 30 2012, 04:36 PM) It is just an f/4... compared to the previous 17-35 f/2.8 at similar pricing... :S damn poisoning.You're in luck... my recent posts are all from the 16-35 f/4 lols. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « QUOTE(ojtee @ Jan 30 2012, 04:43 PM) errr bean, correct me i'm wrong 16-35mm in FX is the equiv to 12-24mm in DX if mounted on its respective FX/DX body yes? The DX FOV of a 16-35mm is about the same as 18-55mm DX kitlens.... exactly. im in the midst funding for full frame camera, in which i need to sell my 1224 for FX wide lens. 1635 is in my mind rite now, with the reviews in the net, its quite tempting. |
|
|
Jan 30 2012, 03:59 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,883 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
QUOTE(ojtee @ Jan 30 2012, 03:43 PM) errr bean, correct me i'm wrong 16-35mm in FX is the equiv to 12-24mm in DX if mounted on its respective FX/DX body yes? The DX FOV of a 16-35mm is about the same as 18-55mm DX kitlens.... ur question is abit pelik but i assume ur asking thisthe 16-35mm on FX equals to 16-35mm FOV the 16-35mm on DX (needs to x1.5 crop factor) equals to 24-53mm so if the 12-24 on a DX means its equal to 18-36mm on FX |
|
|
Jan 30 2012, 04:04 PM
|
|
Elite
11,861 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Bangalasia |
QUOTE(Tony Stark @ Jan 30 2012, 03:59 PM) ur question is abit pelik but i assume ur asking this DX lens on DX body - need *1.5the 16-35mm on FX equals to 16-35mm FOV the 16-35mm on DX (needs to x1.5 crop factor) equals to 24-53mm so if the 12-24 on a DX means its equal to 18-36mm on FX DX lens on FX body - no need FX lens on DX body - need *1.5 FX lens on FX body - no need conclusion... FX lens or DX lens is just state suitable on what body instead of need or no need *1.5 crop factor? |
|
|
Jan 30 2012, 04:04 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(0168257061 @ Jan 30 2012, 03:48 PM) QUOTE(Irbean @ Jan 30 2012, 03:59 PM) damn poisoning. exactly. im in the midst funding for full frame camera, in which i need to sell my 1224 for FX wide lens. 1635 is in my mind rite now, with the reviews in the net, its quite tempting. ![]() Deck 4 lobby, Superstar Libra by CY Pixels, on Flickr ![]() In case of emergency, Superstar Libra by CY Pixels, on Flickr ![]() Anyone know how to play this?, Superstar Libra by CY Pixels, on Flickr 16-35 is good on FX as a UWA. But on a DX its not here not there. I used D90 + 16-35 before... it becomes extra large kit lens with better optics. |
|
|
Jan 30 2012, 04:06 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
141 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
ISO 6400. damn Full Frame body capability.. aiya..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 30 2012, 04:13 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,335 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
|
|
|
Jan 30 2012, 04:16 PM
|
|
Elite
11,861 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Bangalasia |
QUOTE(Irbean @ Jan 30 2012, 04:06 PM) true...drool .... see my colleague d700 iso 400 can shoot low light...my D70s is... canot do it at all lol. (without flash)if my memory is not wrong la...in pub something Added on January 30, 2012, 4:18 pm QUOTE(seather @ Jan 30 2012, 04:13 PM) i think calculation kena based on what body you use...DX FX label on lens just tell you can mount on what only...if DX lens on DX body no need do crop factor, then the focal range of the lens label need have 2 set of calculation then the fomula will be... DX lens on DX body - no need DX lens on FX body - need /1.5 FX lens on DX body - need *1.5 FX lens on FX body - no need i think will more confusing This post has been edited by Agito666: Jan 30 2012, 04:18 PM |
|
|
Jan 30 2012, 04:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
|
|
|
Jan 30 2012, 04:22 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
141 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
|
|
|
Jan 30 2012, 04:54 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
|
|
|
Jan 30 2012, 04:56 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,308 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(seather @ Jan 30 2012, 04:13 PM) To put it simple, all the lens is 35mm Focal Length.So, doesn't matter the lens is micro 4/3, APS-C, APS-H, Full Frame, etc. Even Compact camera... So, depending on the SENSOR SIZE, you need to multiply the crop factor to get the 35mm Format Focal Length. If you get a micro 4/3, the lens you will notice 14-42mm, which if you multiple by the crop factor (e.g. X2) = 28-84mm |
|
|
Jan 30 2012, 04:57 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,883 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 30 2012, 05:52 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,052 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: House of Wax |
how much is the 16-35mm now? below RM3500?
|
|
|
Jan 30 2012, 06:00 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
214 posts Joined: Sep 2011 |
QUOTE(Tony Stark @ Jan 30 2012, 04:59 PM) ur question is abit pelik but i assume ur asking this actually was wonderng why IrB wanted to get the 16-35mm as he already has the 12-24mm, since he is moving to FX, it actually answers the question which I put up to confuse him..... the 16-35mm on FX equals to 16-35mm FOV the 16-35mm on DX (needs to x1.5 crop factor) equals to 24-53mm so if the 12-24 on a DX means its equal to 18-36mm on FX |
|
|
Jan 30 2012, 06:05 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
473 posts Joined: Feb 2010 |
got questions wants to ask...10-20mm lens is use for??
|
|
|
Jan 30 2012, 06:07 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
116 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
Need advice.
Was thinking of getting a used 12-24 or tokina new 11-16 which price range around rm2k. Instead of getting the lens for my d7000, do u think I should instead get a j1 with 10mm or 10-30mm? Need wide lens mainly for indoor shoot. Am no expert is smaller sensor etc but just need to know if I take with a j1 with 10mm lens against above lens, would the out turn of size(not mentioning the quality etc) after develop the picture would b the same, 4r or 8r ? |
|
|
Jan 30 2012, 06:11 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,448 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
|
|
|
Jan 30 2012, 06:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,573 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
QUOTE(0163119779 @ Jan 30 2012, 06:05 PM) For taking picturesQUOTE(wke002 @ Jan 30 2012, 06:07 PM) Need advice. 10-30mm is not wide since it's a 2.7x crop, so it's an effective 27mm to 81mm Was thinking of getting a used 12-24 or tokina new 11-16 which price range around rm2k. Instead of getting the lens for my d7000, do u think I should instead get a j1 with 10mm or 10-30mm? Need wide lens mainly for indoor shoot. Am no expert is smaller sensor etc but just need to know if I take with a j1 with 10mm lens against above lens, would the out turn of size(not mentioning the quality etc) after develop the picture would b the same, 4r or 8r ? |
|
|
Jan 30 2012, 06:19 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
116 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0273sec
0.90
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 05:27 AM |