I personally do not care which is the best league in the world. The fact that I don't support the best team in the world says it all.
I'll keep my opinion relevant to the thread title which states that Premiership teams cannot compete which I totally disagree with. English teams have been in and about the semi-final stage in recent years no doubt due in part to the fact that it has become more attractive to quality footballers, especially from South America. Prior to Juninho joining Middlesborough, I can't recall which was the last capped South American player to come to England. Ossie Ardiles? Gone are the days where players like Zola, Vialli, Gullit or Klinsmann came to England to end their careers with top sides. Now even smaller English clubs have the same appeal. Bolton did pretty well after securing 'has beens' in Djorkaeff, JJ Okocha, Ivan Campo and even Fernando Hierro. Now top sides like Man Utd and Chelsea are able to sign class A footballers in their prime. Heck, even Fulham managed to sign Edwin Van Der Sar when the Dutchman was still in his prime. All this indicates that the Premiership has come a long way in terms of appeal, for players and investors. Premiership games are scheduled to cater for the Asian market unlike their counterparts which in my opinion, is good planning. Then again, the 3pm sun in England isn't exactly as intense as the 3pm sun in Spain is it? Anyway, my point is the notion suggesting English sides cannot compete in Europe just because the Manchester teams got knocked out this season is ridiculous, or are we only talking about this season?
In recent years even "lowly" Liverpool have won the Champions League once and reached the final on another occasion. I also think that suggesting a club like Barcelona can beat any Premiership side just because they've got the better of Man Utd on two occasions in recent times is inaccurate. First, let me say that I have full respect for Barcelona, I think you guys play really attractive football and Pep Guardiola has done a great job. However, you can be beaten with the right tactics. Liverpool did the unthinkable by beating you 2-1 at the Nou Camp. Yes, we did employ negative tactics but one would be foolish to suggest that a distinctively average looking Liverpool side could beat you at home playing your brand of football. It's easy to criticise us now but if you were us, would you have come to the Nou Camp to attack knowing we still had the 2nd leg to play at Anfield? We did however prove that by playing positive football, we could be a team to be reckoned with. In March 2009, we came out to play and beat Real Madrid 4-0. Now I'm just speaking from a Liverpool perspective of course and we've only come close to winning the Premiership once in the past decade. Even Fulham who are alien to Europe thrashed Juventus in March 2010. Spurs beat then defending champions Inter Milan and topped their group in the same year. Do note that I'm not saying one is better than the other which is what this thread is looking like right now, I'm saying
English clubs can compete. The fact that Liverpool aren't in Europe isn't because we got knocked out of the competition, it's because we failed to qualify which doesn't mean we can't be competitive in Europe. In 2006 we only qualified by virtue of being defending Champions when we contrived to finishing behind Everton and although we would get knocked out by Benfica, we managed to top a group containing Chelsea, Real Betis and Anderlecht. So don't judge how well a club will do in Europe purely on their domestic league standing.
Best league in the world? Well I'd have to say that in my opinion, it would have to be the most competitive league in the world. For that, one only has to look at how many different sides have won their domestic leagues over the past say, 10 years? It isn't about the best players for me. Rangers could sign Ronaldo but that would only make the SPL even more one sided.
Added on December 10, 2011, 9:01 amQUOTE(raul88 @ Dec 9 2011, 11:52 PM)
English's club reality check. -by STEVEN HOWARD - Chief sports writer Here's the flaw in his piece though. It's based largely on this season. Also you can't really look at the England national team and although I agree they'd struggle to make it out of their group in Euro 2012, this has no bearing whatsoever over how English sides will do in Europe. I am no fan of England for I think they are overrated but Premiership sides are multinational. I mean the last Champions League final was contested between a Spanish and English club.
Can't really argue about the being defensively naive part. The mancs have looked vulnerable at the back even with the inclusion of Phil Jones. I will say this though. Having a bad defence just means you need a better offense. Look at the Brazil of old. In more recent times did anyone know that whilst Spurs conceded 11 goals in the Champions League last season during the group stages, they scored 18 goals? More than any other team.
This post has been edited by Duke Red: Dec 10 2011, 09:08 AM