QUOTE(KennyKB @ Nov 30 2011, 08:07 AM)
The Windows phone hardware specs and os are controlled by Microsoft. The manufacturers are not even allowed to put their own UI layer to distinguish their products like Android manufacturers. Every WP7 phone works and feels the same. Microsoft can't treat Nokia special or nobody else will produce WP7 phones on an unlevel playing field.
What's more, other brand have more choices of OS. They can have WP7 or Android or some other (even official MeeGo, which was originally planned but project abandon for another); and when talk about specs, the koreans and taiwanese brand will always/usually be the fastest, latest and price also maybe better.
Currently SE is catching up, they're basically only falling behind in hardware specs (still no dual core device yet).
Now the question is, can Nokia catch up? They're emphasizing on WP7, and some on Symbian; For those who still like/prefer Symbian, may still support Symbian, especially for those who have invested on apps on Symbian OS. If future Symbian is no longer supported or when they want to switch, the question is, how should Nokia convince these people to switch over to WP7 (or WP8)? Why should they not go for Android instead? It's obvious which is the more popular and preferred OS right now, although we're not sure of the future, and for the apps they invested in Symbian, since it's under Nokia OVI account, can the similar apps which is available for WP available to them without re-purchase again (provided they're using Nokia phone and MS have worked something with their market for support of Nokia OVI account).
Finally, as of current, I think if the Symbian users were to choose to switch, I think many would choose to go for Android instead? I think Nokia need to seriously consider and take into account of this.