QUOTE(MUM @ Dec 3 2020, 06:28 PM)
low tax bracket will get lower tax relief deduction compared to higher tax bracket one....
the 50k income will probably kena 1~3% tax bracket while the 200k will probability kena 24%
3k x 1~3% = 30~90 "saving"
3k x 24% = 720 "saving"
both are having the same "lock in" period of 70% of your money placed in....the balance of 30% in normal time if taken out will kena 8% tax
Owh so for the first one should go for it..
Your 720 is the one that lets say after computing the tax to say about 10k... so it’s 10k-720 = 9280 payable tax?
QUOTE(victorian @ Dec 3 2020, 06:40 PM)
Let’s say your annual income is 50k, as long as your chargeable income is above 35k, then it’s worth going for it.
Personal tax relief= 9k
EPF= 4k
Insurance= 3k
Lifestyle tax relief= 2.5k
Your nett chargeable income is below 35k, which puts you at a 3% tax bracket. 3% of 3k is only RM90 which is pretty low if you ask me. + TNG RM40 it’s only rm 130 savings.
But if you are at at 60k annual income, your nett chargeable income is 40k after other tax relief. You will be charged 8% on the amount above 35k.
If you can get the 3k tax relief, it’s RM240+ RM40 TNG.
In my opinion, it’s a no brainer to go for PRS if you are paying 8% tax or more. Money saved is money earned after all. Can you get a guaranteed 8% return elsewhere ?
Now I am thinking cuz once put in the until 55 years old can’t take out 100% hmm
And the touch and go applicable to all prs provider?
But speaking of return, since it might actually drop below our initial capital... worth the opportunity cost? Hmm decisions..
This post has been edited by sabrina222: Dec 3 2020, 06:51 PM