QUOTE(kepalapening @ Aug 27 2012, 02:49 PM)
Frankly speaking, I have not done the test. My Camry comes with 3 digital and 1 mechanical fuel efficiency gauges, and I have posted 2 of them here.
p/s: If you cannot trust the gauges, how can you trust some computer device to save your life.
KB-Grik-SP-Kangar. RM88.
170km/h at about 2750 RPM.
We're not talking about trust here la. p/s: If you cannot trust the gauges, how can you trust some computer device to save your life.
KB-Grik-SP-Kangar. RM88.
170km/h at about 2750 RPM.
Your FC readings will not give you the same figure as your actual full tank mileage. Its the same with most cars as far as i know. A full tank for you will be different from another person driving the same car simply because both of you are not refilling the exact same amount. When u take the actual readings only then ull understand what we mean. Its not about any test. Its a very simple method of fill full, drive, fill full again, report mileage covered, calculate L/100km then compare with gauge readings. What's so difficult? Ure filling fuel every week right? Uve already given us highway readings without we even asking for it. I dont see why it would be a problem to provide data for city driving too.
P/S: Why u still providing currency and town locations to justify FC? Just stick to the simple L/100km bro. Or provide L vs distance travelled at least. I know ure trying to show us how far u travelled but giving names of towns only gives us very rough estimates. Not everybody starts driving from 1 single point in a town you know. Plus nobody drives at a constant 170kmph on a highway over that distance.
This post has been edited by cybermaster98: Aug 27 2012, 03:28 PM
Aug 27 2012, 03:19 PM
Quote
0.0290sec
0.58
6 queries
GZIP Disabled